| Literature DB >> 29467512 |
Evgeny Senokos1,2,3, Yunfu Ou1,2, Juan Jose Torres1, Federico Sket1, Carlos González1,2, Rebeca Marcilla3, Juan J Vilatela4.
Abstract
This work presents a method to produce structural composites capable of energy storage. They are produced by integrating thin sandwich structures of CNT fiber veils and an ionic liquid-based polymer electrolyte between carbon fiber plies, followed by infusion and curing of an epoxy resin. The resulting structure behaves simultaneously as an electric double-layer capacitor and a structural composite, with flexural modulus of 60 GPa and flexural strength of 153 MPa, combined with 88 mF/g of specific capacitance and the highest power (30 W/kg) and energy (37.5 mWh/kg) densities reported so far for structural supercapacitors. In-situ electrochemical measurements during 4-point bending show that electrochemical performance is retained up to fracture, with minor changes in equivalent series resistance for interleaves under compressive stress. En route to improving interlaminar properties we produce grid-shaped interleaves that enable mechanical interconnection of plies by the stiff epoxy. Synchrotron 3D X-ray tomography analysis of the resulting hierarchical structure confirms the formation of interlaminar epoxy joints. The manuscript discusses encapsulation role of epoxy, demonstrated by charge-discharge measurements of composites immersed in water, a deleterious agent for ionic liquids. Finally, we show different architectures free of current collector and electrical insulators, in which both CNT fiber and CF act as active electrodes.Entities:
Year: 2018 PMID: 29467512 PMCID: PMC5821880 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-018-21829-5
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sci Rep ISSN: 2045-2322 Impact factor: 4.379
Figure 1Infusion of epoxy into CF/EDLC/CF lay-up. (a) Scheme of the fabrication of structural supercapacitor composite by stamping a CNT fiber-based EDLC interleaf, embedding it between CF plies and infusion/curing of epoxy resin. (b) Photographs of a CF/EDLC/CF lay-up during epoxy infusion and of the 4 cm2 EDLC interleaf embedded in it (inset). (c) Optical micrograph of composite cross-section (top) showing successful integration of EDLC/CF/epoxy in the laminate and scanning electron micrograph (bottom) of integrated EDLC interleaf.
Figure 2Electrochemical properties of structural EDLC composite during fabrication by vacuum bag resin infusion. (a) Charge-discharge profiles at 5 mA cm−2 of EDLC before infusion, after infusion and after curing of epoxy resin. (b) Energy density obtained for different stages of infusion and curing.
Figure 3In situ electrochemical characterization during four point bending flexural test of the structural supercapacitor composite. (a) Photographs of the flexural test setup at the initial and bent states. (b) Comparison of stress-strain curves obtained for the structural composite containing three embedded EDLC interleaves and a reference composite produced without interleaves. (c) Relative energy and (d) ESR obtained from CD at 5 mA cm−2 measured during bending, for the interleaves under compression (SC_1T), neutral (SC_2M) and tensile (SC_3B) stress states. (e) and (f) SEM images of the composite cross-section after the bending test. The micrographs correspond to areas near the interleaf edge, for the samples subjected to compression (SC_T) (e) and tension (SC_B) (f) stresses.
Figure 4Structural supercapacitor composite with mechanically interconnected plies via the use of grid EDLC interleaves. (a) Photograph of a 32 cm2 grid EDLC interleaf. (b) Schematic of the envisaged structure. (c) Bending stress-strain curves obtained for reference composite and structural supercapacitor containing a grid EDLC interleaf. (d) 3D tomography image confirming penetration of epoxy resin through channels in the interleaf.
Properties of structural supercapacitor composites.
| Electrode material | Electrolyte | Cell voltage, V | Capacitance, F g−1 | Energy, Wh kg−1 | Power, W kg−1 | Mechanical properties, MPa |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CNT fiber-based interleaves in fiber reinforced polymer (This work) | Thermoplastic + [PYR14][TFSI] | 3.5 | 0.088 | 0.037 | 30 | slex = 153 Eflex = 60 000 |
| Carbon fiber + carbon aerogel[ | PEGDE + 10% IL | 0.1 | 0.602 | 0.001 | 0.033 | G12 = 8710 s12 = 895 |
| Carbon fiber[ | PEGDE + IL + 0.1 M LiTFSI | 0.1 (2, expected) | 0.052 | −(0.001, expected) | −(2.68, expected) | E = 18000 |
| CNT-grafted carbon fiber[ | MTM57 + IL + LiFSI | 1 | 0.01 | 0.01 | 0.031 | G12 = 450 s 12 = 14 E = 61200 |
| Carbon fiber[ | CD552 + SR494 + 0.825 M LiIm | 2.5 | 0.093 | 0.021 | 0.15 | G12/SG = 310 |
| CNT fiber[ | Thermoplastic + [PYR14][TFSI] | 3.5 | 6.7 | 0.91b | 3700b | E = 790c s 11 = 53c |
| MWCNTs/ABA/polyaniline-modified carbon fiber[ | CF3SO3Li + PEG copolymer | 1 | 0.125 | 0.017 | — | slex = 21 Eflex = 2900 |
aNormalized by specific gravity (SG). bElectrochemical properties normalized by device weight without metallic current collector or encapsulation material, cTensile test of active material and polymer electrolyte membrane.
Figure 5Encapsulation of the EDLC interleaf by epoxy. (a) Photo of structural supercapacitor composite immersed in water (b) Comparison of CD profiles before and 12 hours after immersion in water show nearly identical electrochemical properties.
Figure 6Alternative structural composite supercapacitor architectures using both CNT fibers and CF as active material, without current collector, separator or insulating layers. (a) Scheme of different EDLC configurations in the composite. (b) Charge-discharge profiles comparing CNT fiber/CNT fiber and CNT fiber/CF device configurations (c) Photographs of the structural supercapacitor powering a red LED in the two configurations.