| Literature DB >> 29467396 |
Estelle Camizuli1,2, Renaud Scheifler3, Stéphane Garnier4, Fabrice Monna5, Rémi Losno6, Claude Gourault5, Gilles Hamm5, Caroline Lachiche5, Guillaume Delivet5, Carmela Chateau7, Paul Alibert4.
Abstract
Throughout history, ancient human societies exploited mineral resources all over the world, even in areas that are now protected and considered to be relatively pristine. Here, we show that past mining still has an impact on wildlife in some French protected areas. We measured cadmium, copper, lead, and zinc concentrations in topsoils and wood mouse kidneys from sites located in the Cévennes and the Morvan. The maximum levels of metals in these topsoils are one or two orders of magnitude greater than their commonly reported mean values in European topsoils. The transfer to biota was effective, as the lead concentration (and to a lesser extent, cadmium) in wood mouse kidneys increased with soil concentration, unlike copper and zinc, providing direct evidence that lead emitted in the environment several centuries ago is still bioavailable to free-ranging mammals. The negative correlation between kidney lead concentration and animal body condition suggests that historical mining activity may continue to play a role in the complex relationships between trace metal pollution and body indices. Ancient mining sites could therefore be used to assess the long-term fate of trace metals in soils and the subsequent risks to human health and the environment.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2018 PMID: 29467396 PMCID: PMC5821829 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-018-20983-0
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sci Rep ISSN: 2045-2322 Impact factor: 4.379
Figure 1Location of the study sites where soils and small mammals were sampled. The Morvan Regional Nature Park and the Cévennes National Park are both located in the Massif Central, France. Within each park, three sites were selected based on their degree of contamination. M0 in the Morvan and C0 in the Cévennes are free of mining and were used as reference sites. The coordinates of the centroid are given in WGS84 (EPSG 4326), decimal degrees (Lat, Long). The maps were created using QGIS software (QGIS Essen 2.14.6, http://www.qgis.org), adapted by E. Camizuli from Google Satellite©2016 and IGN©2016.
Maximum concentrations for Cd, Cu, Pb and Zn in topsoils of the six study sites compared to reference values.
| Cd (mg · kg−1) | Cu (mg · kg−1) | Pb (mg · kg−1) | Zn (mg · kg−1) | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Morvan | M0 | <0.5 (LOD) | 11 | 90 | 90 |
| M1 | 3.2 | 212 | 4520 | 835 | |
| M2 | 54.2 | 81 | 8410 | 13800 | |
| Cévennes | C0 | <0.5 (LOD) | 11 | 85 | 107 |
| C1 | 6.8 | 132 | 1580 | 1560 | |
| C2 | 10 | 105 | 4810 | 142 | |
| European Topsoils[ | Mean value | 0.28 | 17.3 | 32 | 68.1 |
| French sewage sludge for amendment* | Content limit | 2 | 100 | 100 | 300 |
| Dutch standards[ | Intervention value | 12 | 190 | 530 | 720 |
*Under French regulations, sewage sludge for agricultural soil amendment must not contain trace metal concentrations above these limits. LOD stands for Limit Of Detection.
Figure 2(a) Distribution of topsoil concentrations of essential elements (Cu and Zn) at the six study sites. Dutch intervention values for assessing soil contamination are represented by a red line[31] (b) Distribution of essential elements (Cu and Zn) kidney concentrations in wood mice sampled at the six study sites (dry mass basis in). 0 < *** < 0.001 < ** < 0.01 < * < 0.05 < . < 0.1.
Figure 3(a) Distribution of topsoil concentrations of non-essential elements (Pb and Cd) at the six study sites. Dutch intervention values for assessing soil contamination are represented by a red line[31] (b) Distribution of non-essential elements (Pb and Cd) kidney concentrations in wood mice sampled at the six study sites (dry mass basis in). The Lowest Observed Adverse Effect Levels (LOAELs) defined by Shore & Douben[43,44] are represented by a red line. 0 < *** < 0.001 < ** < 0.01 < * < 0.05 < . < 0.1.
Summary of best-fit models for trace metals in wood mouse kidneys.
| Best-fit models |
|
|
| ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
| |||
|
| 5 | 2.50 | 0.03* | ||
|
| 1 | 5.24 | 0.02* | ||
|
| 1 | 21.03 | 9.51 ⋅ 10−06*** | ||
|
|
|
| |||
|
| 5 | 2.56 | 0.03* | ||
|
| 1 | 13.93 | 0.0003*** | ||
|
|
|
| |||
|
| 5 | 10.38 | 1.45 ⋅ 10−08*** | ||
|
| 1 | 9.33 | 0.003** | ||
|
|
|
| |||
|
| 2 | 4.25 | 0.02* | ||
|
| 1 | 18.92 | 4.24 ⋅ 10−05*** |
Models relating trace metal concentrations in kidneys to biological and environmental parameters, and trace metal concentrations in soils. 0 < *** < 0.001 < ** < 0.01 < * < 0.05 < . < 0.1.
Figure 4The effect of Pb concentrations on wood mice. (a) Variation of Pb concentrations in wood mouse kidneys in relation to both Pb concentrations in soils (abscissa) and sites (illustrated by different colours). (b) Variation of body condition as assessed by scaled mass index (SMI) in relation to both Pb concentrations in wood mouse kidneys (abscissa) and sites (illustrated by different colours). As the model was complex, we present only two parameters influencing the SMI (Pb concentrations in wood mice and site).
Summary of best-fit models for body condition and somatic indices.
| Best-fit models |
|
|
| ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| |||||
|
|
| ||||
|
| 5 | 3.26 | 0.008** | ||
|
| 1 | 4.58 | 0.03* | ||
|
| 1 | 5.59 | 0.02* | ||
|
| 1 | 10.78 | 0.001** | ||
|
| 1 | 11.45 | 0.0009*** | ||
|
| |||||
|
|
| ||||
|
| 5 | 7.28 | 4.26 ⋅ 10−06*** | ||
|
| 1 | 10.05 | 0.002** | ||
|
| 1 | 5.88 | 0.02* | ||
|
| |||||
|
|
| ||||
|
| 5 | 5.38 | 0.0001*** | ||
|
| 1 | 10.95 | 0.001** | ||
|
| 1 | 10.52 | 0.001** | ||
Models relating body condition and somatic indices to biological and environmental parameters and trace metal concentrations in wood mouse kidneys. 0 < *** < 0.001 < ** < 0.01 < * < 0.05 < . < 0.1.