| Literature DB >> 29466965 |
Zhenquan Wang1, Fengfeng Weng1, Chen Li2, Hongying Shi3, Zhangke Tang1, Huixian Qiu1, Yue'e He1, Rongzhou Wu4, Maoping Chu5.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: To evaluate differences in laboratory parameters, clinical presentation, and incidence of coronary artery lesions (CAL) between children with neutropenic and non-neutropenic Kawasaki disease (KD).Entities:
Keywords: Coronary artery lesions; Kawasaki disease; Neutropenia
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2018 PMID: 29466965 PMCID: PMC5822559 DOI: 10.1186/s12887-018-1032-z
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Pediatr ISSN: 1471-2431 Impact factor: 2.125
Laboratory parameters of children with KD
| Laboratory parameters | NKD | NNKD | |
|---|---|---|---|
| CRP (mg/L) | 70.1(32.90–105.0) | 74.7(37.95–118.0) | 0.147 |
| WBC (×109/L) | 14.27(11.24–19.04) | 15.60(11.91–19.82) | 0.028 |
| ANC1 (×109/L) | 0.99(0.75–1.25) | 3.53(2.09–4.20) | < 0.001 |
| ANC (×109/L) | 8.66(5.96–12.64) | 9.89(7.02–13.67) | 0.002 |
| △ANC (×109/L) | 7.84(4.87–11.48) | 6.49(3.57–10.17) | 0.001 |
| Hb (g/L) | 109(102–115) | 110(102–117) | 0.268 |
| ALT (U/L) | 29.5(17.0–72.5) | 32.0(17.8–90.0) | 0.304 |
| ESR (mm/h) | 37.0(24.3–46.0) | 35.0(26.0–45.0) | 0.720 |
| PLT (×109/L) | 376(299–465) | 359(294–449) | 0.191 |
| ALB (g/L) | 33.0(28.9–39.1) | 33.3(29.1–38.4) | 0.886 |
| BNP (pg/ml) | 670(319–1543) | 725(305–1934) | 0.528 |
| Na (mmol/L) | 136.0(134.1–137.6) | 136.1(134.2–137.7) | 0.433 |
| PT (s) | 13.2(12.8–13.9) | 13.6(12.9–14.3) | 0.001 |
| APTT (s) | 41.0(37.6–44.8) | 41.8(37.9–46.4) | 0.184 |
| TT (s) | 14.8(14.2–15.4) | 14.7(14.1–15.3) | 0.234 |
| FIB (g/L) | 5.5(4.4–6.4) | 5.9(4.9–7.0) | 0.004 |
| D-Dimer (μg/ml) | 1.0(0.6–1.8) | 1.4(0.8–2.3) | 0.002 |
ANC1 absolute neutrophil count after IVIG treatment. Values are expressed as Median (interquartile range) / Number (percentage). Continuous variables were compared using Kruskal-Wallis test, categorical variables were compared using Chi-square test
Treatment and outcome of children with KD
| Group | NKD | NNKD | |
|---|---|---|---|
| IVIG treatment duration (days) | 7(6–8) | 6(6–7) | 0.002 |
| IVIG dosage | 0.009 | ||
| 2d/kg*1d | 77(14.3%) | 462(85.7%) | |
| 1 g/kg*2d | 43(22.4%) | 149(77.6%) | |
| dipyridamole | 39(37.5%) | 224(33.3%) | 0.404 |
| CAL after treatmenta | 58(31.9%) | 250(22.8%) | 0.008 |
| CAA after treatment | 4(6.9%) | 26(10.4%) | 0.418 |
| IVIG nonresponders | 5(3.0%) | 51(5.8%) | 0.167 |
| Gender | 0.715 | ||
| Female | 63(32.0%) | 389(33.3%) | |
| Male | 134(68.0%) | 779(66.7%) |
aCAL after treatment is defined as patients with persistent CAL after IVIG treatment. Values are expressed as Median (interquartile range) / Number (percentage). Continuous variables were compared using Kruskal-Wallis test, categorical variables were compared using Chi-square test
Subgroup analysis of KD patients with CAL
| Group | NKD | NNKD | |
|---|---|---|---|
| CAL | 58(31.9%) | 250(22.8%) | 0.008 |
| < 3 (years) | 54(93.1%) | 213(85.2%) | 0.110 |
| 3–9(years) | 4(6.9%) | 35(14.0%) | 0.143 |
| > 9(years) | 0 | 2(0.8%) | – |
Values are expressed as Number (percentage). Categorical variables were compared using Chi-square test
The proportion of CAA in patients with KD
| Group | NKD | NNKD | |
|---|---|---|---|
| CAA | 4(13.3%) | 26(86.7%) | 0.418 |
| Small CAA | 1(6.3%) | 15(93.7%) | 0.131a |
| Medium CAA | 3(27.3%) | 8(72.7%) | 0.308b |
| Giant CAA | 0 | 3(100%) | 0.656c |
Values are expressed as Number (percentage). Categorical variables were compared using Chi-square test. a. statistical results between small CAA and medium CAA; b. statistical results between medium CAA and giant CAA; c. statistical results between small CAA and giant CAA
Clinical manifestations of KD in children
| Group | NKD | NNKD | |
|---|---|---|---|
| rash | 145(73.6%) | 865(74.1%) | 0.893 |
| conjunctivitis | 172(87.3%) | 1005(86.0%) | 0.634 |
| changes in lips | 177(89.8%) | 1087(93.1%) | 0.111 |
| changes in extremities | 139(70 .6%) | 867(74.2%) | 0.279 |
| cervical lymphadenopathy | 95(48.2%) | 747(64.0%) | < 0.001 |
Values are expressed as Number (percentage). Categorical variables were compared using Chi-square test
The independent effect of △ANC on the risk of CAL among KD patients
| Exposure | Non-adjusted | Adjusted |
|---|---|---|
| △ANC (× 109/L) | 1.000(0.989,1.012)0.935 | 1.000(0.989,1.011)0.984 |
| △ANC(×109/L)(equal percentiles) | ||
| ≤ 3.015 | 1.0 | 1.0 |
| 3.016–5.652 | 0.879(0.585,1.320)0.534 | 0.873(0.578,1.319)0.519 |
| 5.653–7.850 | 0.768(0.507,1.165)0.214 | 0.760(0.499,1.158)0.202 |
| 7.851–11.474 | 1.042(0.700,1.552)0.839 | 1.021(0.682,1.528)0.919 |
| ≥ 11.475 | 1.091(0.734,1.621)0.667 | 1.138(0.762,1.702)0.527 |
Values are expressed as OR (95%CI) P value;
Adjusted model: age (months); gender;
Fig. 1Threshold effect analysis takes the break point (k) as 6. When k < 6 the OR = 0.97 (0.91, 1.03) and p = 0.3164; when k > 6, the OR = 1.04 (1.00, 1.07) and p = 0.0323