| Literature DB >> 29466394 |
Yingyi Chen1,2,3, Huihui Yu1,2,3, Yanjun Cheng1,2,3, Qianqian Cheng1,2,3, Daoliang Li1,2,3.
Abstract
A precise predictive model is important for obtaining a clear understanding of the changes in dissolved oxygen content in crab ponds. Highly accurate interval forecasting of dissolved oxygen content is fundamental to reduce risk, and three-dimensional prediction can provide more accurate results and overall guidance. In this study, a hybrid three-dimensional (3D) dissolved oxygen content prediction model based on a radial basis function (RBF) neural network, K-means and subtractive clustering was developed and named the subtractive clustering (SC)-K-means-RBF model. In this modeling process, K-means and subtractive clustering methods were employed to enhance the hyperparameters required in the RBF neural network model. The comparison of the predicted results of different traditional models validated the effectiveness and accuracy of the proposed hybrid SC-K-means-RBF model for three-dimensional prediction of dissolved oxygen content. Consequently, the proposed model can effectively display the three-dimensional distribution of dissolved oxygen content and serve as a guide for feeding and future studies.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2018 PMID: 29466394 PMCID: PMC5821340 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0192456
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PLoS One ISSN: 1932-6203 Impact factor: 3.240
Fig 1Structure of RBF[22].
Fig 2The process of parameter selection for the RBF neural network.
Fig 3Topology structure diagram of the digital wireless system.
Details of the test devices.
| Device name | Type | Range | Accuracy |
|---|---|---|---|
| Rainfall collector | Remote transmission weather station Uni-ws-G9 (China) | 0.0~9999.0 (mm) | ±4% |
| Wind speed and direction collector | 0~67 (m/s) | ±5 m/s | |
| Solar radiation collector | 0~1800 (W/m2) | ±5% | |
| Air temperature collector | 40~123.8 (°C) | ±0.4°C 25°C | |
| Air humidity collector | 0~100% (RH) | ±3.0% RH | |
| Atmospheric pressure collector | 0~1100 (hPa) | ±0.3 hPa | |
| Monitoring devices | Hach LDo | 0~20 (mg/L) | ±0.5% |
| Handheld device | Hq40d | ±0.02°C |
Fig 4Point distribution of collected samples.
Top view of the aquaculture pond (A); sectional view of the aquaculture pond (B).
Fig 5The process of the three-dimensional model for dissolved oxygen content.
Fig 6Training results for dissolved oxygen content prediction using the SC-K-means-RBF model.
Error statistics of the four forecasting models.
| Method | SC-K-means-RBF (training) | SC-K-means-RBF (testing) | Standard RBF | IDW | Kriging | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Hidden units | 21 | 21 | 10 | 15 | 20 | 21 | 22 | - | - |
| RMSE | 0.3072 | 0.4929 | 0.7022 | 0.6165 | 0.5646 | 0.6482 | 0.5344 | 0.6447 | 0.3800 |
| MAE | 0.2000 | 0.3484 | 0.4841 | 0.4152 | 0.3628 | 0.3932 | 0.3579 | 0.4442 | 0.3376 |
| R | 0.9309 | 0.8098 | 0.5568 | 0.6541 | 0.7311 | 0.6903 | 0.7525 | 0.6077 | 0.9175 |
| D | 0.9998 | 0.9879 | 0.9725 | 0.9711 | 0.9993 | 0.9521 | 0.9265 | 0.9993 | 0.9650 |
Fig 7Comparison of the dissolved oxygen content forecasting values obtained by SC-K-means-RBF and other methods.
Training and test data.
| Time | X (m) | Y (m) | Z (m) | Dissolved oxygen (mg/L) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 7:07 | 15 | 25 | 0.4 | 2.22 |
| 7:07 | 15 | 25 | 1 | 1.95 |
| 7:07 | 15 | 25 | 1.6 | 1.7 |
| 7:10 | 22.5 | 25 | 0.4 | 2.26 |
| … | ||||
Meteorological data.
| Time | Rainfall | Wind speed | Wind direction | Solar radiation | Air temperature | Relative humidity | Atmos. Pressure |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2015-07-06 07:00:04 | 0.0 | 2.19 | 262.06 | 77.85 | 19.92 | 88.54 | 100.96 |
| 2015-07-06 07:10:06 | 0.0 | 1.94 | 263.76 | 81.32 | 19.93 | 88.05 | 100.96 |
| 2015-07-06 07:20:08 | 0.0 | 1.9 | 260.12 | 95.67 | 20.01 | 88.44 | 100.96 |
| 2015-07-06 07:30:08 | 0.0 | 1.94 | 271.56 | 100.99 | 20.11 | 87.77 | 100.96 |
| 2015-07-06 07:40:06 | 0.0 | 1.23 | 270.87 | 89.23 | 20.14 | 87.08 | 100.96 |
| 2015-07-06 07:50:01 | 0.0 | 1.23 | 268.65 | 116.01 | 20.32 | 86.56 | 100.96 |
| 2015-07-06 08:00:02 | 0.0 | 1.61 | 271.59 | 134.87 | 20.38 | 83.64 | 100.96 |
Fig 8Cross-section of the spatial distribution of dissolved oxygen in the aquaculture pond.
Fig 9Curved surface of dissolved oxygen of 2 mg/L.