Literature DB >> 29464656

Non-invasive Management Options for Erectile Dysfunction When a Phosphodiesterase Type 5 Inhibitor Fails.

Mary Lee1, Roohollah Sharifi2.   

Abstract

Phosphodiesterase type 5 inhibitors (PDE5Is) are the drug of choice for medical management of erectile dysfunction (ED). On-demand PDE5Is have an overall efficacy of 60-70% for ED; 30-35% of patients fail to respond to a PDE5I, and 30-50% of non-responders can be salvaged with detailed counseling on proper use and physician follow-up to ensure that the patient has been prescribed an appropriate and full PDE5I clinical trial. True non-responders may be offered intracavernosal injections of erectogenic drugs, intraurethral alprostadil, or surgical insertion of a penile prosthesis. Such options are not discreet and are associated with more adverse effects than PDE5Is. Thus patients may request additional non-invasive medical management options. This review describes published literature on patients who failed to respond to an on-demand PDE5I regimen and were treated with a non-invasive PDEI-based regimen, including switching from one PDE5I to another; increasing the dose of PDE5I above the labeled dosage range; using two PDE5Is concurrently; using a daily PDE5I regimen; or combining a PDE5I with a testosterone supplement, α-adrenergic antagonist, intraurethral or intracavernosal alprostadil, vacuum erection device, or low-intensity shock wave therapy. The limitations of published clinical trials do not allow for sufficient evidence to recommend one option over another. Therefore, in PDE5I-refractory patients, the choice of a specific next step should be individualized based on the preference of the patient and his sexual partner, the advantages and disadvantages of the various options, the concurrent medical illnesses and medications of the patient, and the patient's response to treatment.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29464656     DOI: 10.1007/s40266-018-0528-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Drugs Aging        ISSN: 1170-229X            Impact factor:   3.923


  97 in total

1.  Combining programmed intracavernous PGE1 injections and sildenafil on demand to salvage sildenafil nonresponders.

Authors:  P Gutierrez; P Hernandez; M Mas
Journal:  Int J Impot Res       Date:  2005 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 2.896

Review 2.  Treating erectile dysfunction when PDE5 inhibitors fail.

Authors:  Chelsea N McMahon; Christopher J Smith; Ridwan Shabsigh
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2006-03-11

3.  PDE-5 inhibitors in monotherapy versus combination therapy in a sample of 1200 patients with erectile dysfunction.

Authors:  Luis Labairu-Huerta; Bárbara Padilla-Fernández; José Luis Arrondo-Arrondo; Lauro Sebastián Valverde-Martínez; Agustín Martín-Rodríguez; Juan Miguel Silva-Abuín; María Begoña García-Cenador; José Antonio Mirón-Canelo; María Fernanda Lorenzo-Gómez
Journal:  Arch Ital Urol Androl       Date:  2015-09-30

Review 4.  The effects of testosterone on the cavernous tissue and erectile function.

Authors:  R Shabsigh
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  1997       Impact factor: 4.226

Review 5.  The management of phosphodiesterase-5 (PDE5) inhibitor failure.

Authors:  David H W Lau; Sashi Kommu; Faiz H Mumtaz; Robert J Morgan; Cecil S Thompson; Dimitri P Mikhailidis
Journal:  Curr Vasc Pharmacol       Date:  2006-04       Impact factor: 2.719

Review 6.  Alprostadil for the treatment of impotence.

Authors:  Vishwanath Hanchanale; Ian Eardley
Journal:  Expert Opin Pharmacother       Date:  2013-12-26       Impact factor: 3.889

7.  Combined sildenafil with vacuum erection device therapy in the management of diabetic men with erectile dysfunction after failure of first-line sildenafil monotherapy.

Authors:  Lu Sun; Fang-Li Peng; Zhi-Ling Yu; Cai-Ling Liu; Jun Chen
Journal:  Int J Urol       Date:  2014-07-14       Impact factor: 3.369

8.  Evaluation of current errors within the administration of phosphodiesterase-5 inhibitors after more than 10 years of use.

Authors:  Javier Romero Otero; Borja García Gómez; José Medina Polo; Estíbaliz Jiménez Alcaide; Eduardo García Cruz; Andrea Sallent Font; Alfredo Rodríguez Antolín
Journal:  Urology       Date:  2014-04-16       Impact factor: 2.649

Review 9.  Testosterone supplementation and sexual function: a meta-analysis study.

Authors:  Giovanni Corona; Andrea M Isidori; Jaques Buvat; Antonio Aversa; Giulia Rastrelli; Geoff Hackett; Vincenzo Rochira; Alessandra Sforza; Andrea Lenzi; Edoardo Mannucci; Mario Maggi
Journal:  J Sex Med       Date:  2014-04-04       Impact factor: 3.802

Review 10.  Combination of psychological intervention and phosphodiesterase-5 inhibitors for erectile dysfunction: a narrative review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Hannah M Schmidt; Thomas Munder; Heike Gerger; Sarah Frühauf; Jürgen Barth
Journal:  J Sex Med       Date:  2014-03-19       Impact factor: 3.802

View more
  4 in total

Review 1.  Indications and characteristics of penile traction and vacuum erection devices.

Authors:  Abida Sultana; Peter Grice; Josip Vukina; Ian Pearce; Vaibhav Modgil
Journal:  Nat Rev Urol       Date:  2021-11-11       Impact factor: 14.432

Review 2.  Restorative Therapies for Erectile Dysfunction: Position Statement From the Sexual Medicine Society of North America (SMSNA).

Authors:  James L Liu; Kevin Y Chu; Andrew T Gabrielson; Run Wang; Landon Trost; Gregory Broderick; Kelvin Davies; Gerald Brock; John Mulhall; Ranjith Ramasamy; Trinity J Bivalacqua
Journal:  Sex Med       Date:  2021-05-14       Impact factor: 2.491

Review 3.  Recent advances in the understanding and management of erectile dysfunction.

Authors:  Sarah C Krzastek; Justin Bopp; Ryan P Smith; Jason R Kovac
Journal:  F1000Res       Date:  2019-01-25

Review 4.  Novel Emerging Therapies for Erectile Dysfunction.

Authors:  Soyeun Kim; Min Chul Cho; Sung Yong Cho; Hong Chung; Mahadevan Raj Rajasekaran
Journal:  World J Mens Health       Date:  2020-03-16       Impact factor: 5.400

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.