Salvatore Annunziata1, Annarosa Cuccaro2, Maria Chiara Tisi2, Stefan Hohaus2, Vittoria Rufini3. 1. Institute of Nuclear Medicine, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Largo Agostino Gemelli 8, 00168, Rome, Italy. salvatoreannunziata@live.it. 2. Institute of Hematology, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Rome, Italy. 3. Institute of Nuclear Medicine, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Largo Agostino Gemelli 8, 00168, Rome, Italy.
Abstract
AIM: To retrospectively investigate the prognostic role of the ratio between target lesion and liver SUVmax (rPET) in patients with follicular lymphoma (FL) submitted to FDG-PET/CT at the end of immuno-chemotherapy (PI-PET), and to compare rPET with International Harmonization Project criteria (IHP), Deauville Score (5p-DS) and FL International Prognostic Index at diagnosis (FLIPI). METHODS: Eighty-nine patients with FL undergoing PI-PET were evaluated. The receiver operating characteristic (ROC) approach was applied to identify the optimal cut-point of rPET with respect to 5-years progression free survival (PFS). The prognostic significance of rPET was compared with IHP, DS and FLIPI. Positive predictive value (PPV) and negative predictive value (NPV) were calculated using the presence of adverse events as gold standard. RESULTS: The ROC analysis for rPET as predictor of progression showed an optimal rPET cut-point of 0.98. Patients with positive values of IHP, DS and rPET had a PFS of 50, 30 and 31%. PPV were of 56, 80 and 80%, NPV of 83, 86 and 88%, respectively. DS and rPET differed only in two patients. FLIPI was not predictive of progression and relapse. CONCLUSIONS: rPET is a prognostic factor in patients with FL submitted to PI-PET. Although it has a similar prognostic power as DS, it can have methodological advantages over visual analysis. PI-PET with different evaluation systems has a stronger prognostic power than FLIPI at diagnosis, so it could be useful to identify patients with FL at risk for early relapse after immuno-chemotherapy.
AIM: To retrospectively investigate the prognostic role of the ratio between target lesion and liver SUVmax (rPET) in patients with follicular lymphoma (FL) submitted to FDG-PET/CT at the end of immuno-chemotherapy (PI-PET), and to compare rPET with International Harmonization Project criteria (IHP), Deauville Score (5p-DS) and FL International Prognostic Index at diagnosis (FLIPI). METHODS: Eighty-nine patients with FL undergoing PI-PET were evaluated. The receiver operating characteristic (ROC) approach was applied to identify the optimal cut-point of rPET with respect to 5-years progression free survival (PFS). The prognostic significance of rPET was compared with IHP, DS and FLIPI. Positive predictive value (PPV) and negative predictive value (NPV) were calculated using the presence of adverse events as gold standard. RESULTS: The ROC analysis for rPET as predictor of progression showed an optimal rPET cut-point of 0.98. Patients with positive values of IHP, DS and rPET had a PFS of 50, 30 and 31%. PPV were of 56, 80 and 80%, NPV of 83, 86 and 88%, respectively. DS and rPET differed only in two patients. FLIPI was not predictive of progression and relapse. CONCLUSIONS: rPET is a prognostic factor in patients with FL submitted to PI-PET. Although it has a similar prognostic power as DS, it can have methodological advantages over visual analysis. PI-PET with different evaluation systems has a stronger prognostic power than FLIPI at diagnosis, so it could be useful to identify patients with FL at risk for early relapse after immuno-chemotherapy.
Authors: Gerben J C Zwezerijnen; Jakoba J Eertink; Maria C Ferrández; Sanne E Wiegers; Coreline N Burggraaff; Pieternella J Lugtenburg; Martijn W Heymans; Henrica C W de Vet; Josée M Zijlstra; Ronald Boellaard Journal: Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging Date: 2022-09-27 Impact factor: 10.057
Authors: Yeye Zhou; Zixuan Zhao; Yiwei Wu; Jihui Li; Bin Zhang; Shibiao Sang; Shengming Deng Journal: Cancer Manag Res Date: 2019-07-23 Impact factor: 3.602
Authors: Kyu Hye Choi; Jin Ho Song; Eun Young Park; Ji Hyun Hong; Ie Ryung Yoo; Youn Soo Lee; Dong-Il Sun; Min-Sik Kim; Yeon-Sil Kim Journal: BMC Cancer Date: 2021-03-25 Impact factor: 4.430
Authors: Imke E Karsten; Gabriele Reinartz; Michaela Pixberg; Kai Kröger; Michael Oertel; Birte Friedrichs; Georg Lenz; Hans Theodor Eich Journal: Biomedicines Date: 2021-05-17