Felix Schyboll1, Uwe Jaekel1, Bernd Weber2, Heiko Neeb3,4. 1. Department of Mathematics and Technology, University of Applied Science Koblenz, Remagen, Germany. 2. Department of Epileptology, University Hospital Bonn and Center for Economics and Neuroscience, University of Bonn, Bonn, Germany. 3. Department of Mathematics and Technology, University of Applied Science Koblenz, Remagen, Germany. neeb@hs-Koblenz.de. 4. Institute for Medical Engineering and Information Processing, University of Koblenz/Landau, Koblenz, Germany. neeb@hs-Koblenz.de.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: Recent MRI studies have shown that the orientation of nerve fibres relative to the main magnetic field affects the R2*(= 1/T2*) relaxation rate in white matter (WM) structures. The underlying physical causes have been discussed in several studies but are still not completely understood. However, understanding these effects in detail is of great importance since this might serve as a basis for the development of new diagnostic tools and/or improve quantitative susceptibility mapping techniques. Therefore, in addition to the known angular dependence of R2*, the current study investigates the relationship between fibre orientation and the longitudinal relaxation rate, R1 (= 1/T1), as well as the apparent water content. MATERIALS AND METHODS: For a group of 16 healthy subjects, a series of gradient echo, echo-planar and diffusion weighted images were acquired at 3T from which the decay rates, the apparent water content and the diffusion direction were reconstructed. The diffusion weighted data were used to determine the angle between the principle fibre direction and the main magnetic field to examine the angular dependence of R1 and apparent water content. RESULTS: The obtained results demonstrate that both parameters depend on the fibre orientation and exhibit a positive correlation with the angle between fibre direction and main magnetic field. CONCLUSION: These observations could be helpful to improve and/or constrain existing biophysical models of brain microstructure by imposing additional constraints resulting from the observed angular dependence R1 and apparent water content in white matter.
OBJECTIVE: Recent MRI studies have shown that the orientation of nerve fibres relative to the main magnetic field affects the R2*(= 1/T2*) relaxation rate in white matter (WM) structures. The underlying physical causes have been discussed in several studies but are still not completely understood. However, understanding these effects in detail is of great importance since this might serve as a basis for the development of new diagnostic tools and/or improve quantitative susceptibility mapping techniques. Therefore, in addition to the known angular dependence of R2*, the current study investigates the relationship between fibre orientation and the longitudinal relaxation rate, R1 (= 1/T1), as well as the apparent water content. MATERIALS AND METHODS: For a group of 16 healthy subjects, a series of gradient echo, echo-planar and diffusion weighted images were acquired at 3T from which the decay rates, the apparent water content and the diffusion direction were reconstructed. The diffusion weighted data were used to determine the angle between the principle fibre direction and the main magnetic field to examine the angular dependence of R1 and apparent water content. RESULTS: The obtained results demonstrate that both parameters depend on the fibre orientation and exhibit a positive correlation with the angle between fibre direction and main magnetic field. CONCLUSION: These observations could be helpful to improve and/or constrain existing biophysical models of brain microstructure by imposing additional constraints resulting from the observed angular dependence R1 and apparent water content in white matter.
Entities:
Keywords:
Fibre orientation; Magnetic susceptibility; T 1 relaxation; White matter
Authors: Stephen M Smith; Mark Jenkinson; Mark W Woolrich; Christian F Beckmann; Timothy E J Behrens; Heidi Johansen-Berg; Peter R Bannister; Marilena De Luca; Ivana Drobnjak; David E Flitney; Rami K Niazy; James Saunders; John Vickers; Yongyue Zhang; Nicola De Stefano; J Michael Brady; Paul M Matthews Journal: Neuroimage Date: 2004 Impact factor: 6.556
Authors: M Filippi; C Tortorella; M Rovaris; M Bozzali; F Possa; M P Sormani; G Iannucci; G Comi Journal: J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry Date: 2000-02 Impact factor: 10.154
Authors: Cornelia Laule; Irene M Vavasour; Kenneth P Whittall; Joel Oger; Donald W Paty; David K B Li; Alex L MacKay; Douglas L Arnold Journal: J Neurol Date: 2003-08 Impact factor: 4.849
Authors: Nina Elina Hänninen; Timo Liimatainen; Matti Hanni; Olli Gröhn; Miika Tapio Nieminen; Mikko Johannes Nissi Journal: Sci Rep Date: 2022-07-15 Impact factor: 4.996
Authors: Christoph Birkl; Jonathan Doucette; Michael Fan; Enedino Hernández-Torres; Alexander Rauscher Journal: Magn Reson Med Date: 2020-10-05 Impact factor: 4.668