Literature DB >> 29464404

Assessing and enhancing the utility of low-cost activity and location sensors for exposure studies.

Stamatelopoulou Asimina1,2, D Chapizanis3, S Karakitsios3, P Kontoroupis3, D N Asimakopoulos4, T Maggos5, D Sarigiannis3,6.   

Abstract

Nowadays, the advancement of mobile technology in conjunction with the introduction of the concept of exposome has provided new dynamics to the exposure studies. Since the addressing of health outcomes related to environmental stressors is crucial, the improvement of exposure assessment methodology is of paramount importance. Towards this aim, a pilot study was carried out in the two major cities of Greece (Athens, Thessaloniki), investigating the applicability of commercially available fitness monitors and the Moves App for tracking people's location and activities, as well as for predicting the type of the encountered location, using advanced modeling techniques. Within the frame of the study, 21 individuals were using the Fitbit Flex activity tracker, a temperature logger, and the application Moves App on their smartphones. For the validation of the above equipment, participants were also carrying an Actigraph (activity sensor) and a GPS device. The data collected from Fitbit Flex, the temperature logger, and the GPS (speed) were used as input parameters in an Artificial Neural Network (ANN) model for predicting the type of location. Analysis of the data showed that the Moves App tends to underestimate the daily steps counts in comparison with Fitbit Flex and Actigraph, respectively, while Moves App predicted the movement trajectory of an individual with reasonable accuracy, compared to a dedicated GPS. Finally, the encountered location was successfully predicted by the ANN in most of the cases.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Activity sensors; Artificial Neural Network (ANN) model; Exposure; Location

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29464404     DOI: 10.1007/s10661-018-6537-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Environ Monit Assess        ISSN: 0167-6369            Impact factor:   2.513


  21 in total

1.  Use of global positioning system technology to track subject's location during environmental exposure sampling.

Authors:  M L Phillips; T A Hall; N A Esmen; R Lynch; D L Johnson
Journal:  J Expo Anal Environ Epidemiol       Date:  2001 May-Jun

2.  The role of GIS: coping with space (and time) in air pollution exposure assessment.

Authors:  David Briggs
Journal:  J Toxicol Environ Health A       Date:  2005 Jul 9-23

Review 3.  Complementing the genome with an "exposome": the outstanding challenge of environmental exposure measurement in molecular epidemiology.

Authors:  Christopher Paul Wild
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2005-08       Impact factor: 4.254

Review 4.  Clinimetric review of motion sensors in children and adolescents.

Authors:  Sanne I de Vries; Ingrid Bakker; Marijke Hopman-Rock; Remy A Hirasing; Willem van Mechelen
Journal:  J Clin Epidemiol       Date:  2006-07       Impact factor: 6.437

5.  Comparison of steps and energy expenditure assessment in adults of Fitbit Tracker and Ultra to the Actical and indirect calorimetry.

Authors:  J Adam Noah; David K Spierer; Jialu Gu; Shaw Bronner
Journal:  J Med Eng Technol       Date:  2013-09-05

Review 6.  Device-based monitoring in physical activity and public health research.

Authors:  David R Bassett
Journal:  Physiol Meas       Date:  2012-10-31       Impact factor: 2.833

7.  Improving estimates of air pollution exposure through ubiquitous sensing technologies.

Authors:  Audrey de Nazelle; Edmund Seto; David Donaire-Gonzalez; Michelle Mendez; Jaume Matamala; Mark J Nieuwenhuijsen; Michael Jerrett
Journal:  Environ Pollut       Date:  2013-02-13       Impact factor: 8.071

Review 8.  Environmental exposure measurement in cancer epidemiology.

Authors:  Christopher P Wild
Journal:  Mutagenesis       Date:  2008-11-25       Impact factor: 3.000

9.  Future research perspectives on environment and health: the requirement for a more expansive concept of translational cancer research.

Authors:  Christopher P Wild
Journal:  Environ Health       Date:  2011-04-05       Impact factor: 5.984

Review 10.  An introduction to the indirect exposure assessment approach: modeling human exposure using microenvironmental measurements and the recent National Human Activity Pattern Survey.

Authors:  N E Klepeis
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  1999-05       Impact factor: 9.031

View more
  8 in total

1.  Enhancing the effectiveness of AHP for environmental performance assessment of Thailand and Taiwan's food industry.

Authors:  Anirut Pipatprapa; Hsiang-Hsi Huang; Ching-Hsu Huang
Journal:  Environ Monit Assess       Date:  2018-11-29       Impact factor: 2.513

2.  Recommendations for determining the validity of consumer wearable and smartphone step count: expert statement and checklist of the INTERLIVE network.

Authors:  William Johnston; Pedro B Judice; Pablo Molina García; Jan M Mühlen; Esben Lykke Skovgaard; Julie Stang; Moritz Schumann; Shulin Cheng; Wilhelm Bloch; Jan Christian Brønd; Ulf Ekelund; Anders Grøntved; Brian Caulfield; Francisco B Ortega; Luis B Sardinha
Journal:  Br J Sports Med       Date:  2020-12-24       Impact factor: 13.800

Review 3.  The Exposome and Toxicology: A Win-Win Collaboration.

Authors:  Robert Barouki; Karine Audouze; Christel Becker; Ludek Blaha; Xavier Coumoul; Spyros Karakitsios; Jana Klanova; Gary W Miller; Elliott J Price; Denis Sarigiannis
Journal:  Toxicol Sci       Date:  2022-02-28       Impact factor: 4.109

4.  Wearable Wireless Sensors for Measuring Calorie Consumption.

Authors:  Faranak Fotouhi-Ghazvini; Saedeh Abbaspour
Journal:  J Med Signals Sens       Date:  2020-02-06

5.  Dynamic classification of personal microenvironments using a suite of wearable, low-cost sensors.

Authors:  Casey Quinn; G Brooke Anderson; Sheryl Magzamen; Charles S Henry; John Volckens
Journal:  J Expo Sci Environ Epidemiol       Date:  2020-01-14       Impact factor: 5.563

6.  Neighbourhood and path-based greenspace in three European countries: associations with objective physical activity.

Authors:  William Mueller; Paul Wilkinson; James Milner; Sotiris Vardoulakis; Susanne Steinle; Juha Pärkkä; Eija Parmes; Luc Cluitmans; Eelco Kuijpers; Anjoeka Pronk; Denis Sarigiannis; Spyros Karakitsios; Dimitris Chapizanis; Thomas Maggos; Asimina Stamatelopoulou; Miranda Loh
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2021-02-04       Impact factor: 3.295

7.  The Validity of the Energy Expenditure Criteria Based on Open Source Code through two Inertial Sensors.

Authors:  Jaime Martín-Martín; Li Wang; Irene De-Torres; Adrian Escriche-Escuder; Manuel González-Sánchez; Antonio Muro-Culebras; Cristina Roldán-Jiménez; María Ruiz-Muñoz; Fermín Mayoral-Cleries; Attila Biró; Wen Tang; Borjanka Nikolova; Alfredo Salvatore; Antonio I Cuesta-Vargas
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2022-03-26       Impact factor: 3.576

Review 8.  A Scoping Review on Wearable Devices for Environmental Monitoring and Their Application for Health and Wellness.

Authors:  Sara Bernasconi; Alessandra Angelucci; Andrea Aliverti
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2022-08-11       Impact factor: 3.847

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.