BACKGROUND: Operative management of scapular body fractures, when indicated, typically involves extensive exposure through a posterior approach. We present our experience with a deltoid preserving approach that allows excellent exposure of the fracture lines for reduction and fixation while minimizing muscle detachment and overall tissue trauma. TECHNIQUE: Exposure of the scapula was obtained through a posterior incision. The posterior deltoid was exposed and retracted superiorly while the arm was abducted in accordance with Brodsky et al. The scapula was exposed in the interval between infraspinatus and teres minor. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Six patients were treated using this approach and were retrospectively reviewed. All were men with a mean age of 34 years (range 24-45 ± 6.7 years). The injuries involved two 14-A3.1 and four 14-A3.2 AO/OTA types of fractures. The mean follow-up after surgery was 28 months (range 21-36 ± 4.93 months). RESULTS: All fractures could be anatomically reduced and healed without compromise. The mean Constant score was 93.8 (range 91-97 ± 2.13), while range of motion and strength returned to levels equal to the uninjured shoulder. All patients returned to their previous level of activity. We did not observe atrophy of the posterior muscles or hardware complications, and none required hardware removal. CONCLUSION: The deltoid and external rotators preserving posterior approach permitted good visualization of the fractures while allowing reduction and fixation without extensive muscular dissection and provided excellent functional outcomes. We consider that it offers obvious advantages over more aggressive muscle detaching approaches. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic study, IV.
BACKGROUND: Operative management of scapular body fractures, when indicated, typically involves extensive exposure through a posterior approach. We present our experience with a deltoid preserving approach that allows excellent exposure of the fracture lines for reduction and fixation while minimizing muscle detachment and overall tissue trauma. TECHNIQUE: Exposure of the scapula was obtained through a posterior incision. The posterior deltoid was exposed and retracted superiorly while the arm was abducted in accordance with Brodsky et al. The scapula was exposed in the interval between infraspinatus and teres minor. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Six patients were treated using this approach and were retrospectively reviewed. All were men with a mean age of 34 years (range 24-45 ± 6.7 years). The injuries involved two 14-A3.1 and four 14-A3.2 AO/OTA types of fractures. The mean follow-up after surgery was 28 months (range 21-36 ± 4.93 months). RESULTS: All fractures could be anatomically reduced and healed without compromise. The mean Constant score was 93.8 (range 91-97 ± 2.13), while range of motion and strength returned to levels equal to the uninjured shoulder. All patients returned to their previous level of activity. We did not observe atrophy of the posterior muscles or hardware complications, and none required hardware removal. CONCLUSION: The deltoid and external rotators preserving posterior approach permitted good visualization of the fractures while allowing reduction and fixation without extensive muscular dissection and provided excellent functional outcomes. We consider that it offers obvious advantages over more aggressive muscle detaching approaches. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic study, IV.
Entities:
Keywords:
Deltoid; Fractures; Posterior shoulder approach; Rotator cuff; Scapular body
Authors: Sean E Nork; David P Barei; Michael J Gardner; Thomas A Schildhauer; Keith A Mayo; Stephen K Benirschke Journal: J Orthop Trauma Date: 2008-08 Impact factor: 2.512
Authors: J L Marsh; Theddy F Slongo; Julie Agel; J Scott Broderick; William Creevey; Thomas A DeCoster; Laura Prokuski; Michael S Sirkin; Bruce Ziran; Brad Henley; Laurent Audigé Journal: J Orthop Trauma Date: 2007 Nov-Dec Impact factor: 2.512