| Literature DB >> 29463919 |
Anderson H Kuo1, Cun Li2,3, Vicki Mattern3, Hillary F Huber2, Anthony Comuzzie4, Laura Cox3, Matthias Schwab5, Peter W Nathanielsz2,3, Geoffrey D Clarke6,3.
Abstract
Developmental programming by reduced maternal nutrition alters function in multiple offspring physiological systems, including lipid metabolism. We have shown that intrauterine growth restriction (IUGR) leads to offspring cardiovascular dysfunction with an accelerated aging phenotype in our nonhuman primate, baboon model. We hypothesized age-advanced pericardial fat and blood lipid changes. In pregnancy and lactation, pregnant baboons ate ad lib (control) or 70% ad lib diet (IUGR). We studied baboon offspring pericardial lipid deposition with magnetic resonance imaging at 5-6 years (human equivalent 20-24 years), skinfold thickness, and serum lipid profile at 8-9 years (human equivalent 32-36 years), comparing values with a normative life-course baboon cohort, 4-23 years. Increased pericardial fat deposition occurred in IUGR males but not females. Female but not male total cholesterol, low-density lipoprotein, and subcutaneous fat were increased with a trend of triglycerides increase. When comparing IUGR changes to values in normal older baboons, the increase in male apical pericardial fat was equivalent to advancing age by 6 years and the increase in female low-density lipoprotein to an increase of 3 years. We conclude that reduced maternal diet accelerates offspring lipid changes in a sex-dimorphic manner. The interaction between programming and accelerated lipogenesis warrants further investigation.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2018 PMID: 29463919 PMCID: PMC6019612 DOI: 10.1038/s41366-018-0008-2
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int J Obes (Lond) ISSN: 0307-0565 Impact factor: 5.095
Measurements
| Measurement | CTL | IUGR | t-Test | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| M | F | M | F | ||
|
| |||||
| Number | 12 | 12 | 8 | 8 | - |
|
| |||||
| Weight (kg) | 30.5 ± 1.4 | 17.0 ± 0.8 | 27.6 ± 0.9 | 16.9 ± 0.9 | NS |
|
| |||||
| Length (cm) | 126 ± 2 | 106 ± 1 | 120 ± 2 | 106 ± 2 | M: CTL > IUGR |
| F: NS | |||||
|
| |||||
| BMI | 19.3 ± 0.8 | 15.4 ± 1.0 | 19.2 ± 0.8 | 15.1 ± 0.7 | NS |
|
| |||||
| Biceps Skinfold (cm) | 2.6 ± 0.1 | 2.1 ± 0.2 | 2.8 ± 0.2 | 2.4 ± 0.2 | NS |
|
| |||||
| Triceps Skinfold (cm) | 2.4 ± 0.2 | 2.1 ± 0.2 | 2.7 ± 0.2 | 2.6 ± 0.2 | M: NS |
| F: IUGR > CTL | |||||
|
| |||||
| Quadriceps Skinfold (cm) | 2.7 ± 0.2 | 2.1 ± 0.1 | 2.7 ± 0.2 | 3.0 ± 0.5 | M: NS |
| F: IUGR > CTL | |||||
|
| |||||
| Suprailiac Skinfold (cm) | 3.8 ± 0.5 | 3.2 ± 0.2 | 3.9 ± 0.5 | 4.3 ± 0.7 | M: NS |
| F: IUGR > CTL | |||||
|
| |||||
| Number | 8 | 8 | 8 | 8 | - |
|
| |||||
| Periapical Fat Thickness (mm) | 6.33 ± 0.75 | 9.00 ± 1.59 | 12.01 ± 2.16 | 9.31 ± 0.61 | M: IUGR > CTL |
| F: NS | |||||
|
| |||||
| Periapical Fat Thickness/BSA (mm/m2) | 12.2 ± 1.5 | 19.9 ± 3.3 | 20.0 ± 3.6 | 21.6 ± 1.4 | M: IUGR > CTL |
| F: NS | |||||
|
| |||||
|
| |||||
| Number | 10 | 9 | 8 | 8 | - |
|
| |||||
| Total Cholesterol (mg/dL) | 88.8 ± 3.0 | 90.0 ± 6.4 | 85.0 ± 6.4 | 106.6 ± 5.8 | M: NS |
| F: IUGR > CTL | |||||
|
| |||||
| LDL Cholesterol (mg/dL) | 27.1 ± 2.5 | 31.4 ± 3.6 | 24.5 ± 3.0 | 42.4 ± 2.4 | M: NS |
| F: IUGR > CTL | |||||
|
| |||||
| HDL Cholesterol (mg/dL) | 52.3 ± 1.7 | 47.8 ± 3.5 | 52.3 ± 3.4 | 51.0 ± 3.8 | NS |
|
| |||||
| Triglycerides (mg/dL) | 49.2 ± 5.8 | 56.2 ± 3.5 | 43.4 ± 4.5 | 67.5 ± 7.0 | NS |
|
| |||||
| Glucose (mg/dL) | 101.8 ± 8.3 | 102.7 ± 8.6 | 109.4 ± 8.4 | 117.0 ± 13.1 | NS |
|
| |||||
| HbA1c (%) | 4.4 ± 0.1 | 4.2 ± 0.1 | 4.3 ± 0.1 | 4.2 ± 0.1 | NS |
Mean ± SEM.
p < 0.05;
NS- not significant.
Figure 1Apical Pericardial Adiposity and Serum Lipid Measurements
(A) Apical pericardial fat normalized for BSA at 5-6 years, mean + SEM, * p < 0.05. One statistical outlier was removed from the male CTL group and one from the female IUGR group. (B) Normalized apical pericardial fat thickness of the IUGR males (closed squares, N = 8) against the life course cohort (open circle, N = 18) with solid regression line for the life course cohort and dotted 95% confidence interval bands. (C) Corresponding graph for females with life course cohort (open circle, N = 18) and female IUGR group (closed squares, N = 7). (D) LDL concentration at 8-9 years, mean + SEM, * p < 0.05. (E) IUGR male baboon (closed squares, N = 8) LDL concentration against the life course cohort (open circle, N = 17) with solid regression line for the life course cohort and dotted 95% confidence interval bands. (F) Female IUGR (closed squares, N = 8) LDL concentration against life course cohort (open circle, N = 32) with solid regression line for the life course cohort and dotted 95% confidence interval bands.