| Literature DB >> 29463717 |
Chen-Ching Yuan1, Katarzyna Kazmierczak1, Jingsheng Liang1, Zhiqun Zhou1, Sunil Yadav1, Aldrin V Gomes2, Thomas C Irving3, Danuta Szczesna-Cordary4.
Abstract
Dilated cardiomyopathy (DCM) is a devastating heart disease that affects about 1 million people in the United States, but the underlying mechanisms remain poorly understood. In this study, we aimed to determine the biomechanical and structural causes of DCM in transgenic mice carrying a novel mutation in the MYL2 gene, encoding the cardiac myosin regulatory light chain. Transgenic D94A (aspartic acid-to-alanine) mice were created and investigated by echocardiography and invasive hemodynamic and molecular structural and functional assessments. Consistent with the DCM phenotype, a significant reduction of the ejection fraction (EF) was observed in ∼5- and ∼12-mo-old male and female D94A lines compared with respective WT controls. Younger male D94A mice showed a more pronounced left ventricular (LV) chamber dilation compared with female counterparts, but both sexes of D94A lines developed DCM by 12 mo of age. The hypocontractile activity of D94A myosin motors resulted in the rightward shift of the force-pCa dependence and decreased actin-activated myosin ATPase activity. Consistent with a decreased Ca2+ sensitivity of contractile force, a small-angle X-ray diffraction study, performed in D94A fibers at submaximal Ca2+ concentrations, revealed repositioning of the D94A cross-bridge mass toward the thick-filament backbone supporting the hypocontractile state of D94A myosin motors. Our data suggest that structural perturbations at the level of sarcomeres result in aberrant cardiomyocyte cytoarchitecture and lead to LV chamber dilation and decreased EF, manifesting in systolic dysfunction of D94A hearts. The D94A-induced development of DCM in mice closely follows the clinical phenotype and suggests that MYL2 may serve as a new therapeutic target for dilated cardiomyopathy.Entities:
Keywords: DCM; MYL2; invasive hemodynamics; myosin RLC; transgenic D94A mice
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2018 PMID: 29463717 PMCID: PMC5877945 DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1716925115
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A ISSN: 0027-8424 Impact factor: 11.205
Fig. 1.(A) Transgene construct with α-MHC promoter for expression of the D94A-RLC mutant (Left) and amino acid sequence of human cardiac RLC UniProtKB P10916 (pI 4.89; molecular mass 18.789 kDa) (Right). HGH, human growth hormone. (B) Relative expression of D94A-RLC in Tg mice. (B, Right) Sample spectra of human (Upper) and mouse (Lower) RLC sequences. (C) Two-dimensional SDS/PAGE and Western blots of ventricular myosin from WT, D94A-L1, and D94A-L2 mouse lines. RLC proteins were visualized with the CT-1 antibody and the myosin essential light chain (ELC) protein (used as a loading control) with the monoclonal ab680 antibody (Abcam). Phosphorylated and nonphosphorylated human (huRLC-WT and huRLC-D94A) and mouse (muRLC) RLC proteins were separated according to their respective molecular masses and pI, and were quantitated using n = 5 or 6 myosin/myofibrillar preparations per line ±SD. No statistical difference in RLC phosphorylation was observed between WT, D94A-L1, and D94A-L2 mice, P > 0.05, using one-way ANOVA.
Fig. 2.(A) Hearts of representative ∼5-mo-old male and female D94A mice and their longitudinal sections showing biventricular cardiac dilation compared with respective WT controls. (Scale bars, 1 mm.) (B) Transmission electron microscopy images of ∼9-mo-old D94A-L1 vs. WT hearts. [Scale bars, 10 µm (Left), 2 µm (Middle), and 1 µm (Right).] Note excessive vacuolar formations in the myocardium of D94A vs. WT mice. (C) Hematoxylin and eosin- and Masson’s trichrome-stained LV sections from ∼5- and ∼12-mo-old M and F D94A-L1 and -L2 vs. WT mice. (Scale bar, 100 µm.) (D) Hydroxyproline content in the hearts of 7- to 11-mo-old M and F D94A-L1 and -L2 compared with WT mice.
Fig. 3.In vivo characterization of heart morphology and function in D94A vs. WT lines by echocardiography (A) and invasive hemodynamics (B). Two lines of D94A (L1 and L2) female (open symbols) and male (closed symbols) were used and the results were compared with age- and sex-matched WT mice. CO, cardiac output; Ea, arterial elastance; EDV, end-diastolic volume; Ees, end-systolic elastance; EF, ejection fraction; FS, fractional shortening; LVID, left ventricular inner diameter in diastole (d) and systole (s); PRSW, prerecruitable SW; SW, stroke work; Tau, relaxation time constant. The number of F and M mice examined is given in Table 1. Data are the mean ± SEM. *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01, and ***P < 0.001 D94A vs. WT, #P < 0.05, and ##P < 0.01 L1 vs. L2, by one-way ANOVA and the post hoc Tukey’s multiple comparison test.
Intact heart function in ∼5-mo-old D94A-RLC mice compared with WT-RLC animals by echocardiography and invasive hemodynamics
| Parameter | D94A-L1-F | D94A-L2-F | WT-F | D94A-L1-M | D94A-L2-M | WT-M |
| Echocardiography | ||||||
| No. of animals | 14 | 6 | 8 | 9 | 6 | 10 |
| Heart/body, mg/g | 4.63 ± 0.16 | 4.52 ± 0.36 | 4.48 ± 0.29 | 4.66 ± 0.12 | 5.15 ± 0.14 | 5.31 ± 0.21 |
| Heart/tibia, mg/mm | 7.01 ± 0.2 | 6.8 ± 0.19 | 6.69 ± 0.55 | 9.06 ± 0.27 | 10.34 ± 0.35* | 8.74 ± 0.3a |
| HR, bpm | 503 ± 9 | 498 ± 17 | 478 ± 17 | 512 ± 15 | 520 ± 11 | 497 ± 14 |
| IVCT, ms | 15.09 ± 1.01 | 12.48 ± 1.72 | 15.33 ± 1.6 | 15.49 ± 1.41 | 11.61 ± 1.11 | 15.09 ± 1.6 |
| IVRT, ms | 17.06 ± 1.5 | 14.92 ± 1.42 | 15.85 ± 0.9 | 15.76 ± 1.59 | 13.94 ± 0.46 | 14 ± 0.69 |
| MV E/A | 2.63 ± 0.24 | 1.83 ± 0.23 | 2.4 ± 0.29 | 1.88 ± 0.19 | 1.74 ± 0.17 | 1.91 ± 0.13 |
| MV E/E′ | −26.7 ± 2.4 | −24.2 ± 2.8 | −25.9 ± 2.0 | −22.1 ± 1.3 | −31.2 ± 2.1 | −25.5 ± 2.4 |
| EF, % | 47 ± 2** | 52 ± 1 | 60 ± 3 | 35 ± 2***,#,a | 45 ± 2**,a | 60 ± 2 |
| FS, % | 23 ± 1* | 22 ± 2* | 31 ± 3 | 19 ± 1a,** | 23 ± 1 | 29 ± 2 |
| IVS;d, mm | 0.81 ± 0.03 | 0.76 ± 0.03 | 0.74 ± 0.03 | 0.82 ± 0.06 | 0.87 ± 0.03 | 0.9 ± 0.04a |
| IVS;s, mm | 1.09 ± 0.04 | 0.98 ± 0.06 | 1.09 ± 0.08 | 1.11 ± 0.09 | 1.13 ± 0.05 | 1.21 ± 0.08 |
| LVID;d, mm | 4.05 ± 0.11 | 3.97 ± 0.09 | 3.89 ± 0.08 | 4.19 ± 0.12 | 4.42 ± 0.08a | 4.16 ± 0.1a |
| LVID;s, mm | 3.12 ± 0.12* | 3.09 ± 0.09 | 2.66 ± 0.14 | 3.38 ± 0.13* | 3.39 ± 0.10* | 2.96 ± 0.13 |
| LVPW;d, mm | 0.7 ± 0.03 | 0.71 ± 0.03 | 0.73 ± 0.02 | 0.8 ± 0.05 | 0.77 ± 0.04 | 0.78 ± 0.02 |
| LVPW;s, mm | 0.9 ± 0.05* | 0.96 ± 0.05 | 1.06 ± 0.06 | 0.99 ± 0.06 | 1.06 ± 0.07 | 1.14 ± 0.04 |
| Hemodynamics | ||||||
| No. of animals | 10 | 6 | 5 | 6 | 5 | 6 |
| SW, mmHg×µL | 1,779 ± 144 | 1,898 ± 137 | 1,896 ± 127 | 1,741 ± 259 | 2,592 ± 153a | 2,577 ± 344 |
| CO, µL/min | 11,349 ± 1,155 | 13,330 ± 753 | 12,538 ± 1,109 | 11,106 ± 1,138* | 16,938 ± 916a | 16,673 ± 1,777 |
| SV, µL | 23.24 ± 2.06 | 24.99 ± 1.14 | 24.92 ± 1.11 | 21.78 ± 1.87*,# | 31.54 ± 1.57a | 32.86 ± 2.89a |
| ESV, µL | 31.92 ± 3.46 | 30.65 ± 1.91 | 23.6 ± 2.26 | 45.95 ± 2.56*,a | 41.22 ± 1.94a | 34.31 ± 3.66a |
| EDV, µL | 49.25 ± 4.09 | 50.39 ± 2.65 | 44.02 ± 1.8 | 62.49 ± 3.51 | 67.98 ± 2.35a | 59.35 ± 4.49a |
| Pes, mmHg | 100.2 ± 3.03* | 97.31 ± 3.78 | 87.13 ± 3.21 | 99.6 ± 4.96 | 95.23 ± 1.59 | 92.23 ± 3.61 |
| Ped, mmHg | 5.48 ± 0.78 | 7.22 ± 2.29 | 5.42 ± 1.42 | 5.42 ± 1.09 | 4.91 ± 1.72 | 7.29 ± 1.8 |
| HR, bpm | 484 ± 16 | 532 ± 8 | 499 ± 25 | 506 ± 20 | 537 ± 12 | 504 ± 13 |
| Ea, mmHg/µL | 4.54 ± 0.28* | 3.94 ± 0.21 | 3.53 ± 0.14 | 4.75 ± 0.48** | 3.02 ± 0.17 | 2.93 ± 0.3 |
| Ea/Ees | 1.73 ± 0.22 | 1.99 ± 0.56 | 0.84 ± 0.08 | 1.36 ± 0.25 | 0.96 ± 0.25 | 1.42 ± 0.24 |
| dP/d | 9,339 ± 787 | 11,099 ± 1,794 | 9,249 ± 574 | 8,818 ± 659 | 9,010 ± 544 | 8,248 ± 575 |
| dP/d | −9,428 ± 516 | −9,593 ± 1,162 | −9,133 ± 405 | −8,496 ± 791 | −9,655 ± 622 | −8,784 ± 1,051 |
| Tau, ms | 6.22 ± 0.18 | 6.51 ± 0.82 | 5.87 ± 0.29 | 6.44 ± 0.23 | 5.46 ± 0.22 | 6.86 ± 1.18 |
| No. of animals | 9 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 5 | 5 |
| ESPVR | 3.24 ± 0.47 | 2.9 ± 0.76 | 4.24 ± 0.38 | 3.99 ± 0.81 | 4.39 ± 1.4 | 2.35 ± 0.52 |
| EDPVR | 0.15 ± 0.02 | 0.14 ± 0.02 | 0.16 ± 0.03 | 0.15 ± 0.06 | 0.10 ± 0.02 | 0.10 ± 0.01 |
| PRSW | 52.53 ± 4.59 | 58.09 ± 6.02 | 70.64 ± 5.78 | 60.69 ± 2.6 | 75.14 ± 6.35 | 68.64 ± 5.84 |
| dP/d | 184.62 ± 21.3 | 184.78 ± 35.6 | 150.1 ± 19.66 | 172.61 ± 24.6 | 144.58 ± 15.8 | 117.44 ± 19.1 |
Heart weight/body weight (in mg/g); heart weight/tibia length (in mg/mm); CO, cardiac output; d, diastolic; dP/dtmax, peak rate for pressure rise; −dP/dtmin, peak rate for pressure decline; EDPVR, slope of end-diastolic PV relationship; EDV, end-diastolic volume; Ees, end-systolic elastance, slope of ESPVR (end-systolic pressure–volume relationship); ESV, end-systolic volume; FS, fractional shortening; HR, heart rate (in beats per min); IVCT, isovolumetric contraction time; IVRT, isovolumetric relaxation time; IVS, interventricular septum; LVID, left ventricular inner diameter; LVPW, LV posterior wall; MV E/A, mitral early (E)-to-late (A) diastolic inflow velocity; E’, early diastolic velocity; Ped, end-diastolic pressure; Pes, end-systolic pressure; PRSW, prerecruitable SW (slope of SW–EDV relationship); s, systolic; SV, stroke volume; SW, stroke work; Tau, relaxation time constant. Data are the mean ± SEM. *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01, and ***P < 0.001 D94A vs. WT, #P < 0.05 L1 vs. L2, by one-way ANOVA and the post hoc Tukey’s multiple comparison test; aP < 0.05 M vs. F, by Student’s t test.
Fig. 4.(A) Contractile function in papillary muscle fibers from ∼5- and ∼12-mo-old D94A-L1 and -L2 vs. WT mice. Open symbols depict female and closed symbols indicate male animals. (B) The effect of D94A mutation on force and calcium transients in intact papillary muscles. The measurements were performed on intact papillary muscles from 6- to 8-mo-old gender-matched D94A-L1 (five M and three F) and WT (three M and three F) mice. Time (in milliseconds) to depart 50% (t50) from t0 to peak during contraction, and from peak to baseline during relaxation, is characterized by TF-contract and TF-relax (force transients) and TC-contract and TC-relax ([Ca2+] transients). Maximum velocity of force departing from and returning to the baseline during muscle contraction and relaxation is reported as VF-contract and VF-relax (force transients) and VC-contract and VC-relax ([Ca2+] transients). Note a significant (*P < 0.05) decrease in TF-relax in D94A-L1 vs. WT fibers. Results are presented as the average ± SD of n animals with *P < 0.05 and **P ≤ 0.01 for mutant vs. WT and #P < 0.05 for D94A-L1 vs. D94A-L2, using one-way ANOVA (A) or Student’s t test (B). (C) Gene expression profiles in D94A and WT mice. Real-time qPCR was performed on three F (open symbols) and three M (close symbols) D94A-L1 and WT mice, and the results are presented as fold change in transcript expression in D94A vs. WT mice. Data are the mean ± SEM. *P < 0.05, using one-way ANOVA with the Tukey’s multiple comparison test.
Contractile function in skinned papillary muscle fibers from ∼5- and ∼12-mo-old D94A-RLC mice compared with WT-RLC animals
| Parameter | D94A-L1-F | D94A-L2-F | WT-F | D94A-L1-M | D94A-L2-M | WT-M | D94A-L1ALL | D94A-L2ALL | WTALL |
| Five-mo-old mice | |||||||||
| No. of animals (fibers) | 5 (40) | 5 (46) | 5 (39) | 5 (38) | 5 (39) | 5 (49) | 10 (78) | 10 (85) | 10 (88) |
| | 57.71 ± 1.36*,# | 54.1 ± 2.98 | 54.27 ± 0.32 | 55.19 ± 1.18 | 54.94 ± 3.14 | 53.99 ± 1.76 | 56.45 ± 1.79 | 54.52 ± 2.92 | 54.13 ± 1.2 |
| pCa50 | 5.56 ± 0.08 | 5.54 ± 0.05* | 5.67 ± 0.09 | 5.52 ± 0.06**,# | 5.44 ± 0.01** | 5.69 ± 0.07 | 5.54 ± 0.07** | 5.49 ± 0.06** | 5.68 ± 0.07 |
| Hill coefficient | 2.99 ± 0.68 | 3.61 ± 0.88 | 2.81 ± 0.29 | 2.8 ± 0.82 | 2.89 ± 0.61 | 3.25 ± 0.78 | 2.89 ± 0.72 | 3.25 ± 0.81 | 3.03 ± 0.6 |
| Twelve-mo-old mice | |||||||||
| No. of animals (fibers) | 5 (44) | 3 (18) | 5 (46) | 5 (44) | 4 (19) | 4 (51) | 11 (88) | 7 (37) | 9 (97) |
| | 56.06 ± 1.47* | 57.62 ± 1.22* | 52.51 ± 2.45 | 55.89 ± 1.07 | 56.39 ± 0.35 | 54.38 ± 1.54 | 55.97 ± 1.2* | 56.91 ± 0.99* | 53.34 ± 2.21 |
| pCa50 | 5.55 ± 0.05 | 5.56 ± 0.01 | 5.66 ± 0.1 | 5.58 ± 0.06 | 5.56 ± 0.04 | 5.61 ± 0.05 | 5.57 ± 0.05* | 5.56 ± 0.03* | 5.64 ± 0.08 |
| Hill coefficient | 3.78 ± 0.35**,## | 2.84 ± 0.25 | 2.65 ± 0.19 | 3.8 ± 0.29**,## | 2.97 ± 0.45 | 2.71 ± 0.21 | 3.79 ± 0.3**,## | 2.91 ± 0.36 | 2.68 ± 0.19 |
Fmax, tension per cross-section of muscle; pCa50, calcium concentration for half-maximal activation (Ca2+ sensitivity). Data are the mean ± SD of n (number of animals) experiments; *P < 0.05 and **P ≤ 0.01 for mutant vs. WT, and #P < 0.05 and ##P ≤ 0.01 for D94A-L1 vs. D94A-L2, using one-way ANOVA.
Fig. 5.(A) Actin-activated myosin ATPase activity of D94A and WT myosins. A significantly lower Vmax was observed for D94A-L1 (0.57 ± 0.02 s−1; n = 14) and D94A-L2 (0.69 ± 0.03 s−1; n = 6) myosins compared with WT (0.88 ± 0.05 s−1; n = 8). (B) Fluorescence-based binding assays of D94A or WT myosin to pyrene-labeled F-actin in the absence of ATP (rigor). Note a significantly higher binding affinity of D94A-L1 (Kd 4.48 ± 0.67 nM; n = 9) and D94A-L2 myosin (Kd 5.73 ± 0.58 nM; n = 10) vs. WT (Kd 8.31 ± 0.35 nM; n = 10) control. Both assays (A and B) were performed on myosin purified from left and right ventricles of 5- to 8-mo-old F and M D94A and WT mice. Approximately four or five hearts per group were used to generate one batch of myosin, and the assays were repeated with two to four different batches of myosin. No differences between the sexes were noted, and the data from M and F mice were pooled. Data are the mean ± SEM of n experiments with *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01, and ***P < 0.001 calculated, using one-way ANOVA with the Tukey’s multiple comparison test.
Fig. 6.Small-angle X-ray diffraction patterns and integrated intensity traces collected from papillary muscles from D94A-L1 (n = 3 F and 3 M mice) vs. WT (n = 4 F and 3 M mice) in relaxation (pCa 8) and activation (pCa 5.2). All patterns show clearly resolved 1,0 and 1,1 reflections. Note the significant difference in I1,1/I1,0 between D94A-L1 and WT (P = 0.043). Data are the mean ± SEM of n animals with *P < 0.05, using Student’s t test.