Literature DB >> 29463204

Intraindividual variability in neurocognitive performance is associated with time-based prospective memory in older adults.

Kelli L Sullivan1, Steven Paul Woods1,2, Romola S Bucks2, Shayne Loft2, Michael Weinborn2.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Older adults demonstrate poorer prospective memory (PM) performance than younger adults, particularly for time-based cues and other strategically demanding PM tasks. Intraindividual variability (IIV) in neurocognitive test performance is an index of cognitive control that may be related to the execution of strategically demanding PM tasks.
METHOD: Participants included 194 older Australian adults (age 50 to 88 years) who completed the Memory for Intentions Screening Test (MIST), the Prospective and Retrospective Memory Questionnaire (PRMQ), and clinical measures of executive functions. A measure of naturalistic time-based PM was also administered, in which participants were asked to call the examiner 24 hours after their appointment to report how many hours they slept. IIV was calculated as the mean-adjusted coefficient of variation (CoV) across subtests of the Repeatable Battery for the Assessment of Neuropsychological Status (RBANS).
RESULTS: IIV was significantly associated with time-based PM in the laboratory, independent of demographics. Additionally, IIV significantly predicted performance on a naturalistic time-based PM trial, independent of demographics and chronic medical conditions. IIV was not related to event-based laboratory PM or self-reported PM symptoms in daily life. Clinical measures of executive functions were similarly associated with time-based PM and the naturalistic PM task, but not with event-based PM or subjective PM symptoms.
CONCLUSIONS: These results indicate that cognitive control, as indexed by IIV in neurocognitive performance, may play a role in naturalistic PM, as well as in highly strategic, but not automatic, laboratory-based PM among older adults.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Aging; coefficient of variation; dispersion; executive function; memory for intentions

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29463204      PMCID: PMC6140338          DOI: 10.1080/13803395.2018.1432571

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Exp Neuropsychol        ISSN: 1380-3395            Impact factor:   2.475


  46 in total

1.  Aging and prospective memory: differences between naturalistic and laboratory tasks.

Authors:  P G Rendell; D M Thomson
Journal:  J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci       Date:  1999-07       Impact factor: 4.077

2.  Memory for intentions is uniquely associated with instrumental activities of daily living in healthy older adults.

Authors:  Steven Paul Woods; Michael Weinborn; Aimee Velnoweth; Alexandra Rooney; Romola S Bucks
Journal:  J Int Neuropsychol Soc       Date:  2011-10-28       Impact factor: 2.892

3.  The PHQ-9: validity of a brief depression severity measure.

Authors:  K Kroenke; R L Spitzer; J B Williams
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2001-09       Impact factor: 5.128

4.  Predictors of self-reported prospective and retrospective memory in a population-based sample of older adults.

Authors:  Michael Rönnlund; Peter Vestergren; Timo Mäntylä; Lars-Göran Nilsson
Journal:  J Genet Psychol       Date:  2011 Jul-Sep       Impact factor: 1.509

5.  Does prospective memory influence quality of life in community-dwelling older adults?

Authors:  Steven Paul Woods; Michael Weinborn; Yanqi Ryan Li; Erica Hodgson; Amanda R J Ng; Romola S Bucks
Journal:  Neuropsychol Dev Cogn B Aging Neuropsychol Cogn       Date:  2015-03-26

6.  Cortical brain atrophy and intra-individual variability in neuropsychological test performance in HIV disease.

Authors:  Lindsay J Hines; Eric N Miller; Charles H Hinkin; Jeffery R Alger; Peter Barker; Karl Goodkin; Eileen M Martin; Victoria Maruca; Ann Ragin; Ned Sacktor; Joanne Sanders; Ola Selnes; James T Becker
Journal:  Brain Imaging Behav       Date:  2016-09       Impact factor: 3.978

7.  Prospective memory and its correlates and predictors in schizophrenia: an extension of previous findings.

Authors:  Gabor S Ungvari; Yu-Tao Xiang; Wai-Kwong Tang; David Shum
Journal:  Arch Clin Neuropsychol       Date:  2008-07-17       Impact factor: 2.813

8.  Within-person across-neuropsychological test variability and incident dementia.

Authors:  Roee Holtzer; Joe Verghese; Cuiling Wang; Charles B Hall; Richard B Lipton
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2008-08-20       Impact factor: 56.272

9.  Intraindividual variability across cognitive domains: investigation of dispersion levels and performance profiles in older adults.

Authors:  Jennifer V Hilborn; Esther Strauss; David F Hultsch; Michael A Hunter
Journal:  J Clin Exp Neuropsychol       Date:  2009-05       Impact factor: 2.475

10.  Psychometric characteristics of the memory for intentions screening test.

Authors:  Steven Paul Woods; Lisa M Moran; Matthew S Dawson; Catherine L Carey; Igor Grant
Journal:  Clin Neuropsychol       Date:  2008-09       Impact factor: 3.535

View more
  6 in total

1.  The Impact of a Sustained Cognitive Engagement Intervention on Cognitive Variability: The Synapse Project.

Authors:  Christopher R Brydges; Allison A M Bielak
Journal:  J Cogn Enhanc       Date:  2019-06-05

2.  Factor Structure of the Memory for Intentions Test (MIsT): A Conceptual Replication in Older Adults and People with HIV Disease.

Authors:  Kelli L Sullivan; Matthew W Gallagher; Romola S Bucks; Michael Weinborn; Steven Paul Woods
Journal:  J Clin Exp Neuropsychol       Date:  2022-08-05       Impact factor: 2.283

3.  Bridging the gap between performance-based assessment and self-reported everyday functioning: An ecological momentary assessment approach.

Authors:  Maureen Schmitter-Edgecombe; Catherine Sumida; Diane J Cook
Journal:  Clin Neuropsychol       Date:  2020-03-19       Impact factor: 3.535

4.  Enhancing cue salience improves aspects of naturalistic time-based prospective memory in older adults with HIV disease.

Authors:  Steven Paul Woods; Erin E Morgan; Shayne Loft; Anastasia Matchanova; Marizela Verduzco; Clint Cushman
Journal:  Neuropsychology       Date:  2021-01       Impact factor: 3.295

5.  Manipulations of the Response-Stimulus Intervals as a Factor Inducing Controlled Amount of Reaction Time Intra-Individual Variability.

Authors:  Paweł Krukow; Małgorzata Plechawska-Wójcik; Arkadiusz Podkowiński
Journal:  Brain Sci       Date:  2021-05-20

6.  Virtual Cohorts and Synthetic Data in Dementia: An Illustration of Their Potential to Advance Research.

Authors:  Graciela Muniz-Terrera; Ofer Mendelevitch; Rodrigo Barnes; Michael D Lesh
Journal:  Front Artif Intell       Date:  2021-05-17
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.