Literature DB >> 29463177

The combination of targeted and systematic prostate biopsies is the best protocol for the detection of clinically significant prostate cancer.

Alexandre Fourcade1,2,3, Charlotte Payrard1,2,3, Valentin Tissot2,3,4, Marie-Aimée Perrouin-Verbe1,2,3, Nicolas Demany2,3,4, Sophie Serey-Effeil1,2,3, Pierre Callerot1,2,3, Jean-Baptiste Coquet1,2,3, Laurent Doucet5, Charles Deruelle1, Vincent Joulin1, Michel Nonent2,3,4, Georges Fournier1,2,3,6, Antoine Valeri1,2,3,6.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Compared with standard systematic transrectal ultrasound (TRUS)-guided biopsies (SBx), targeted biopsies (TBx) using magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)/TRUS fusion could increase the detection of clinically significant prostate cancer (PCa-s) and reduce non-significant PCa (PCa-ns). This study aimed to compare the performance of the two approaches.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: A prospective, single-center study was conducted on all consecutive patients with PCa suspicion who underwent prebiopsy multiparametric MRI (mpMRI) using the Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System (PI-RADS). All patients underwent mpMRI/TRUS fusion TBx (two to four cores/target) using UroStation™ (Koelis, Grenoble, France) and SBx (10-12 cores) during the same session. PCa-s was defined as a maximal positive core length ≥4 mm or Gleason score ≥7.
RESULTS: The study included 191 patients (at least one suspicious lesion: PI-RADS ≥3). PCa was detected in 55.5% (106/191) of the cases. The overall PCa detection rate and the PCa-s detection rate were not significantly higher in TBx alone versus SBx (44.5% vs 46.1%, p = .7, and 38.2% vs 33.5%, p = .2, respectively). Combined TBx and SBx diagnosed significantly more PCa-s than SBx alone (45% vs 33.5%, p = .02). PCa-s was detected only by TBx in 12% of cases (23/191) and only by SBx in 7.3% (14/191). Gleason score was upgraded by TBx in 16.8% (32/191) and by SBx in 13.6% (26/191) of patients (p = .4).
CONCLUSIONS: The combination of TBx and SBx achieved the best results for the detection and prognosis of PCa-s. The use of SBx alone would have missed the detection of PCa-s in 12% of patients.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Biopsy; PI-RADS; diagnosis; multiparametric MRI; prostate cancer; targeted biopsy

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29463177     DOI: 10.1080/21681805.2018.1438509

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Scand J Urol        ISSN: 2168-1805            Impact factor:   1.612


  11 in total

1.  What is the ideal number of biopsy cores per lesion in targeted prostate biopsy?

Authors:  Gokhan Sonmez; Turev Demirtas; Sevket T Tombul; Figen Ozturk; Abdullah Demirtas
Journal:  Prostate Int       Date:  2020-04-23

2.  Prostate cancer: diagnostic yield of modified transrectal ultrasound-guided twelve-core combined biopsy (targeted plus systematic biopsies) using prebiopsy magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  Chorog Song; Sung Yoon Park
Journal:  Abdom Radiol (NY)       Date:  2021-06-28

3.  Patient-reported pain, discomfort, and anxiety during magnetic resonance imaging-targeted prostate biopsy.

Authors:  Gregory T Chesnut; Piotr Zareba; Daniel D Sjoberg; Maha Mamoor; Sigrid Carlsson; Taehyoung Lee; Jonathan Fainberg; Emily Vertosick; Michael Manasia; Mary Schoen; Behfar Ehdaie
Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J       Date:  2019-11-29       Impact factor: 1.862

4.  Magnetic resonance imaging/transrectal ultrasonography fusion guided seed placement in a phantom: Accuracy between 2-seed versus 1-seed strategies.

Authors:  Qian Li; Yu Duan; Masoud Baikpour; Theodore T Pierce; Colin J McCarthy; Ashraf Thabet; Suk-Tak Chan; Anthony E Samir
Journal:  Eur J Radiol       Date:  2020-06-10       Impact factor: 3.528

5.  Comparison of prostate cancer detection rates between magnetic resonance imaging-targeted biopsy and transrectal ultrasound-guided biopsy according to Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System in patients with PSA ≥4 ng/mL: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Kai Zhu; Zhiqiang Qin; Jianxin Xue; Chenkui Miao; Ye Tian; Shouyong Liu; Shenhao Zhu; Qi Gu; Chao Hou; Aiming Xu; Jie Yang; Zengjun Wang
Journal:  Transl Androl Urol       Date:  2019-12

Review 6.  The current role of prostate multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  Olivier Rouviere; Paul Cezar Moldovan
Journal:  Asian J Urol       Date:  2018-12-11

7.  A Comparative Study: Has MRI-guided Fusion Prostate Biopsy Changed the Prostate-specific Antigen Gray-zone Range?

Authors:  Gökhan Sönmez; Şevket T Tombul; Türev Demirtaş; Figen Öztürk; Abdullah Demirtaş
Journal:  Cureus       Date:  2019-12-08

Review 8.  Transrectal Ultrasound in Prostate Cancer: Current Utilization, Integration with mpMRI, HIFU and Other Emerging Applications.

Authors:  John Panzone; Timothy Byler; Gennady Bratslavsky; Hanan Goldberg
Journal:  Cancer Manag Res       Date:  2022-03-22       Impact factor: 3.989

9.  Comparison of pain levels in fusion prostate biopsy and standard TRUS-Guided biopsy.

Authors:  Abdullah Demirtaş; Gökhan Sönmez; Şevket Tolga Tombul; Türev Demirtaş
Journal:  Int Braz J Urol       Date:  2020 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 1.541

10.  A Single-center Experience: Does MRI-guided Target Prostate Biopsy Meet Expectations?

Authors:  Türev Demirtaş; Gökhan Sönmez; Şevket T Tombul; Abdullah Demirtaş
Journal:  Cureus       Date:  2019-11-14
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.