Literature DB >> 29463118

Clinical contribution of myositis-related antibodies detected by immunoblot to idiopathic inflammatory myositis: A one-year retrospective study.

Marie Lecouffe-Desprets1, Caroline Hémont2,3,4, Antoine Néel1,2,3, Claire Toquet5, Agathe Masseau1, Mohamed Hamidou1,2,3,6, Regis Josien2,3,4,6, Jérôme C Martin2,3,4,6.   

Abstract

In this study, we aimed at evaluating the contribution of an extended myositis-related antibodies (Abs) determination by immunoblot to the diagnosis, classification, and prognosis of idiopathic inflammatory myositis (IIM). Medical records of all the patients (n = 237) with myositis-related Ab requests addressed to our department over a one-year period were retrospectively analyzed. Patients were classified as IIM, auto-immune disease (AID) other than IIM, and other diagnosis, and examined for their Ab profiles as determined by immunoblot. Ab positivity was qualified semi-quantitatively as low or strong according to the manufacturer's recommendations. Among the 45 Ab-positive patients, 49% were diagnosed an IIM, 22% another AID, and 29% another diagnosis. The clinico-serological patterns of the myositis-related Ab+ patients fully recapitulated those described in the literature. Among non-IIM patients, anti-PM-Scl was the most frequently detected Ab (38%), followed by anti-Mi-2 (15%), and anti-OJ (12%). Importantly, strong Ab positivity was significantly more detected in IIM vs. non-IIM patients (82% vs. 35%; p = .002). This difference was further increased when comparing MSAs only (95% vs. 36%; p = .0004). Accordingly, strong Ab positivity associated with high specificity (96%) and positive likelihood ratio (pLR =12) for IIM. Our data suggest that while myositis-related Ab, including MSA, can be detected by immunoblot in non-IIM patients, strong positivity is nevertheless highly predictive of IIM. In conclusion, this work suggests that relevant clinical contribution to IIM is provided by the immunoblot determination of myositis-related Ab, more especially when considering strong positive detection of MSA.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Idiopathic inflammatory myositis; immunoblot; muscle biopsy; myositis-associated antibodies; myositis-related antibodies; myositis-specific antibodies

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29463118     DOI: 10.1080/08916934.2018.1441830

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Autoimmunity        ISSN: 0891-6934            Impact factor:   2.815


  3 in total

1.  Evaluating the diagnostic utility of new line immunoassays for myositis antibodies in clinical practice: a retrospective study.

Authors:  Federica Montagnese; Haris Babačić; Peter Eichhorn; Benedikt Schoser
Journal:  J Neurol       Date:  2019-03-06       Impact factor: 4.849

2.  Including myositis-specific autoantibodies improves performance of the idiopathic inflammatory myopathies classification criteria.

Authors:  Fergus To; Matthew J S Parker; Clara Ventín-Rodríguez; James B Lilleker; Hector Chinoy
Journal:  Rheumatology (Oxford)       Date:  2019-12-01       Impact factor: 7.580

3.  Association of extended myositis panel results, clinical features, and diagnoses: a single-center retrospective observational study.

Authors:  Shamma Ahmad Al Nokhatha; Eman Alfares; Luke Corcoran; Niall Conlon; Richard Conway
Journal:  Rheumatol Int       Date:  2021-10-04       Impact factor: 2.631

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.