Literature DB >> 29462813

Hemostatic Efficacy and Safety of the Novel Medical Adhesive, MAR VIVO-107, in a Rabbit Liver Resection Model.

Kenji Fukushima1,2, Hirokazu Tanaka1,3, Pramod Kadaba Srinivasan1, Kerstin Pawlowsky1, Babette Kögel1, Shinji Uemoto3, Yonson Ku2, René H Tolba1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Topical hemostatic agents are useful when hepatic hemorrhage is difficult to control. The aim of this study was to evaluate the hemostatic efficacy and safety of a biodegradable polyurethane-based adhesive, MAR VIVO-107 (MAR), in comparison with a clinically used fibrin glue.
METHODS: Thirty female New Zealand white rabbits were randomly assigned to 3 study groups as follows: MAR (n = 10), fibrin glue (n = 10), and saline groups (n = 10). After standardized partial liver resection was performed, each agent was immediately applied to the wound area. Bleeding time until hemostasis and blood loss were recorded. After 7 days, body weight, hematology parameters, and serum levels of aspartate aminotransferase, alanine aminotransferase, and lactate dehydrogenase were measured. Simultaneously, the severity of intra-abdominal adhesion was evaluated.
RESULTS: The mean bleeding time in the MAR (38 ± 10 s) and fibrin glue groups (65 ± 17 s) was significantly shorter than that in the saline group (186 ± 12 s). Similarly, the mean blood loss in the MAR (9 ± 3 g) and fibrin glue groups (9 ± 3 g) was significantly less than that in the saline group (23 ± 4 g). No significant differences in bleeding time and blood loss were found between the MAR and fibrin glue groups. The postoperative survival rate was 100% in all the groups. Body weight as well as hematological and serum biochemical values on day 7 were within the small and physiological range when compared with the preoperative baseline values, and significant differences were not detected among the MAR, fibrin glue, and saline groups. The severities of adhesion were similar between the 3 groups.
CONCLUSION: Our data demonstrated that MAR was not inferior to fibrin glue in terms of hemostatic efficacy and safety.
© 2018 S. Karger AG, Basel.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Adhesive; Hemorrhage; Hemostasis; Liver resection; Polyurethane

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29462813     DOI: 10.1159/000481818

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Surg Res        ISSN: 0014-312X            Impact factor:   1.745


  2 in total

1.  Biomimetic hybrid hydrogel for hemostasis, adhesion prevention and promoting regeneration after partial liver resection.

Authors:  Zuhong Li; Yalei Zhao; Xiaoxi Ouyang; Ya Yang; Yangjun Chen; Qixia Luo; Yanhong Zhang; Danhua Zhu; Xiaopeng Yu; Lanjuan Li
Journal:  Bioact Mater       Date:  2021-10-19

2.  Mechanical strength and hydrostatic testing of VIVO adhesive in sutureless microsurgical anastomoses: an ex vivo study.

Authors:  Marius Heitzer; Julia Brockhaus; Kristian Kniha; Felix Merkord; Florian Peters; Frank Hölzle; Evgeny Goloborodko; Ali Modabber
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-06-30       Impact factor: 4.379

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.