Literature DB >> 29462494

Why did severe feather pecking and cannibalism outbreaks occur? An unintended case study while investigating the effects of forage and stress on pullets during rearing.

G M Cronin1, R L Hopcroft1, P J Groves2, E J S Hall3, D N Phalen2, P H Hemsworth4.   

Abstract

This 2 × 2 factorial experiment aimed to investigate the effects of stimulating foraging behavior from wk 6 and imposed stress at wk 16 on the development of severe feather pecking (SFP) in chickens reared for free-range egg production. Non-beak-trimmed ISA Brown chicks were purchased at one day old and floor-reared on wood shavings. From wk 6, straw was provided daily in dispensers (Forage vs. No forage) to stimulate foraging. At wk 15, there were 16 pens of 50 pullets. "Stressors" were applied to half the pens in wk 16 via combined transport, relocation, and mixing (TRM) of pullets, simulating activities around transfer from the rearing to egg-laying farm (TRM vs. Not TRM). Range access was permitted from wk 21. Behavior, plumage damage (PD), growth, egg production, feed use, injuries, and mortalities were recorded, along with litter moisture and pH. In wk 26, an SFP outbreak commenced. By wk 34, PD was worse in south- than north-aspect pens (P < 0.001). Further, PD was more affected by side of the shed than the experimental treatments. In wk 30, an outbreak of injurious pecking (IP) commenced in the 4 TRM-treatment pens on the south side, with IP deaths almost 3 times more common in the Forage+TRM than No forage+TRM treatment. We suggest factors associated with a 13-day rainfall event that occurred in late winter predisposed the flock to SFP. While multiple factors such as winter cold, muddy ranges, damp floor litter with elevated pH, among others coincided, hens were clearly more impacted in south- than north-aspect pens. Once initiated, SFP possibly spread via social learning, and by wk 40, ∼98% of hens had PD. Interestingly, the IP outbreak was related to a combination of factors (stressors?), such as being housed in colder, damper south-aspect pens (note: southern hemisphere), having added Forage, and TRM. These unexpected relationships could help direct future research to identify the specific factors involved in the causation of SFP and IP/cannibalism outbreaks.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29462494     DOI: 10.3382/ps/pey022

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Poult Sci        ISSN: 0032-5791            Impact factor:   3.352


  10 in total

1.  Do Hens Use Enrichments Provided in Free-Range Systems?

Authors:  Victoria Sandilands; Laurence Baker; Jo Donbavand; Sarah Brocklehurst
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2022-04-12       Impact factor: 3.231

Review 2.  Caught on Camera: On the Need of Responsible Use of Video Observation for Animal Behavior and Welfare Research.

Authors:  Mona F Giersberg; Franck L B Meijboom
Journal:  Front Vet Sci       Date:  2022-04-25

Review 3.  Effects of litter and additional enrichment elements on the occurrence of feather pecking in pullets and laying hens - A focused review.

Authors:  Ruben Schreiter; Klaus Damme; Eberhard von Borell; Isabelle Vogt; Michael Klunker; Markus Freick
Journal:  Vet Med Sci       Date:  2019-07-03

4.  Gradual Provision of Live Black Soldier Fly (Hermetia illucens) Larvae to Older Laying Hens: Effect on Production Performance, Egg Quality, Feather Condition and Behavior.

Authors:  Laura Star; Tarique Arsiwalla; Francesc Molist; Raymond Leushuis; Monika Dalim; Aman Paul
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2020-01-28       Impact factor: 2.752

5.  A meta-analysis on the effect of environmental enrichment on feather pecking and feather damage in laying hens.

Authors:  Nienke van Staaveren; Jennifer Ellis; Christine F Baes; Alexandra Harlander-Matauschek
Journal:  Poult Sci       Date:  2020-11-19       Impact factor: 3.352

6.  L. rhamnosus improves the immune response and tryptophan catabolism in laying hen pullets.

Authors:  Claire Mindus; Nienke van Staaveren; Dietmar Fuchs; Johanna M Gostner; Joergen B Kjaer; Wolfgang Kunze; M Firoz Mian; Anna K Shoveller; Paul Forsythe; Alexandra Harlander-Matauschek
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-10-01       Impact factor: 4.379

Review 7.  The Impact of Probiotic Bacillus subtilis on Injurious Behavior in Laying Hens.

Authors:  Sha Jiang; Jia-Ying Hu; Heng-Wei Cheng
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2022-03-30       Impact factor: 2.752

Review 8.  Farm Environmental Enrichments Improve the Welfare of Layer Chicks and Pullets: A Comprehensive Review.

Authors:  Dan Xu; Gang Shu; Yanting Liu; Pingwu Qin; Yilei Zheng; Yaofu Tian; Xiaoling Zhao; Xiaohui Du
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2022-09-29       Impact factor: 3.231

9.  Feather Pecking and Cannibalism in Non-Beak-Trimmed Laying Hen Flocks-Farmers' Perspectives.

Authors:  Eija Kaukonen; Anna Valros
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2019-01-30       Impact factor: 2.752

10.  Effects of edible environmental enrichments during the rearing and laying periods in a littered aviary-Part 2: physical development of pullets and performance, egg quality, and carcass composition in laying hens.

Authors:  Ruben Schreiter; Klaus Damme; Michael Klunker; Camille Raoult; Eberhard von Borell; Markus Freick
Journal:  Poult Sci       Date:  2020-09-06       Impact factor: 3.352

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.