PURPOSE: To compare optical coherence tomography angiography (OCTA) measured macular vessel density and spectral domain optical coherence tomography (SDOCT) measured macular ganglion cell complex (GCC) thickness in primary open-angle glaucoma eyes with and without focal lamina cribrosa (LC) defects. METHODS: In this cross-sectional, case-control study of patients with primary open-angle glaucoma, 46 eyes of 46 patients with LC defects and 54 eyes of 54 patients without observable LC defects were included. OCTA and SDOCT imaging were performed on the same day by the same operator. Perimetry and swept-source OCT testing used to identify LC defects were conducted within 6 months of OCTA and SDOCT testing. Global and local parafoveal vessel density and macular GCC thickness were compared between study groups. RESULTS: Glaucoma severity was similar between groups (SAP mean deviation=-5.63 and -4.64 dB for eyes with and without LC defects, respectively; P=0.40). Global and local measured parafoveal vessel density was similar between groups (all P≥0.11). GCC focal loss volume was higher in eyes with LC defects than eyes without LC defects (7.2% and 4.97%, respectively; P=0.03). In addition, GCC focal loss volume was topographically related to defect location in LC defect eyes. CONCLUSIONS: Although OCTA macular vessel density was not significantly different between eyes with and without LC defects, focal GCC loss in eyes with LC defects was different. This highlights the importance of not relying solely on vessel density measurements for determining macular changes for diagnosing and detecting glaucomatous progression.
PURPOSE: To compare optical coherence tomography angiography (OCTA) measured macular vessel density and spectral domain optical coherence tomography (SDOCT) measured macular ganglion cell complex (GCC) thickness in primary open-angle glaucoma eyes with and without focal lamina cribrosa (LC) defects. METHODS: In this cross-sectional, case-control study of patients with primary open-angle glaucoma, 46 eyes of 46 patients with LC defects and 54 eyes of 54 patients without observable LC defects were included. OCTA and SDOCT imaging were performed on the same day by the same operator. Perimetry and swept-source OCT testing used to identify LC defects were conducted within 6 months of OCTA and SDOCT testing. Global and local parafoveal vessel density and macular GCC thickness were compared between study groups. RESULTS:Glaucoma severity was similar between groups (SAP mean deviation=-5.63 and -4.64 dB for eyes with and without LC defects, respectively; P=0.40). Global and local measured parafoveal vessel density was similar between groups (all P≥0.11). GCC focal loss volume was higher in eyes with LC defects than eyes without LC defects (7.2% and 4.97%, respectively; P=0.03). In addition, GCC focal loss volume was topographically related to defect location in LC defect eyes. CONCLUSIONS: Although OCTA macular vessel density was not significantly different between eyes with and without LC defects, focal GCC loss in eyes with LC defects was different. This highlights the importance of not relying solely on vessel density measurements for determining macular changes for diagnosing and detecting glaucomatous progression.
Authors: Saman Kiumehr; Sung Chul Park; Dorairaj Syril; Christopher C Teng; Celso Tello; Jeffrey M Liebmann; Robert Ritch Journal: Arch Ophthalmol Date: 2012-05
Authors: Paula K Yu; Ian L McAllister; William H Morgan; Stephen J Cringle; Dao-Yi Yu Journal: Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci Date: 2017-07-01 Impact factor: 4.799
Authors: Abtin Shahlaee; Wasim A Samara; Jason Hsu; Emil Anthony T Say; M Ali Khan; Jayanth Sridhar; Bryan K Hong; Carol L Shields; Allen C Ho Journal: Am J Ophthalmol Date: 2016-02-24 Impact factor: 5.258
Authors: Sung Chul Park; Anthony T Hsu; Daniel Su; Joseph L Simonson; Mohammed Al-Jumayli; Yiyi Liu; Jeffrey M Liebmann; Robert Ritch Journal: Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci Date: 2013-12-30 Impact factor: 4.799
Authors: Jae Young You; Sung Chul Park; Daniel Su; Christopher C Teng; Jeffrey M Liebmann; Robert Ritch Journal: JAMA Ophthalmol Date: 2013-03 Impact factor: 7.389
Authors: Yali Jia; Eric Wei; Xiaogang Wang; Xinbo Zhang; John C Morrison; Mansi Parikh; Lori H Lombardi; Devin M Gattey; Rebecca L Armour; Beth Edmunds; Martin F Kraus; James G Fujimoto; David Huang Journal: Ophthalmology Date: 2014-03-12 Impact factor: 12.079
Authors: Nils A Loewen; Xinbo Zhang; Ou Tan; Brian A Francis; David S Greenfield; Joel S Schuman; Rohit Varma; David Huang Journal: Br J Ophthalmol Date: 2015-03-20 Impact factor: 4.638
Authors: Nevin W El-Nimri; Patricia Isabel C Manalastas; Linda M Zangwill; James A Proudfoot; Christopher Bowd; Huiyuan Hou; Sasan Moghimi; Rafaella C Penteado; Jasmin Rezapour; Eren Ekici; Takuhei Shoji; Elham Ghahari; Adeleh Yarmohammadi; Robert N Weinreb Journal: J Glaucoma Date: 2021-06-01 Impact factor: 2.290
Authors: Harsha L Rao; Zia S Pradhan; Min Hee Suh; Sasan Moghimi; Kaweh Mansouri; Robert N Weinreb Journal: J Glaucoma Date: 2020-04 Impact factor: 2.290