Literature DB >> 29461516

A database of chlorophyll a in Australian waters.

Claire H Davies1, Penelope Ajani2, Linda Armbrecht3, Natalia Atkins4, Mark E Baird1, Jason Beard5, Pru Bonham1, Michele Burford6, Lesley Clementson1, Peter Coad7, Christine Crawford5, Jocelyn Dela-Cruz8, Martina A Doblin2, Steven Edgar9, Ruth Eriksen1,10, Jason D Everett11, Miles Furnas12, Daniel P Harrison13, Christel Hassler14, Natasha Henschke15, Xavier Hoenner4, Tim Ingleton8, Ian Jameson16, John Keesing17, Sophie C Leterme18, M James McLaughlin17, Margaret Miller9, David Moffatt19, Andrew Moss20, Sasi Nayar21, Nicole L Patten21, Renee Patten22, Sarah A Pausina9,23, Roger Proctor4, Eric Raes24,25, Malcolm Robb26, Peter Rothlisberg9, Emily A Saeck6, Peter Scanes27, Iain M Suthers11,13, Kerrie M Swadling5,10, Samantha Talbot12, Peter Thompson1, Paul G Thomson28, Julian Uribe-Palomino9, Paul van Ruth21, Anya M Waite24,25, Simon Wright29, Anthony J Richardson9,30.   

Abstract

Chlorophyll a is the most commonly used indicator of phytoplankton biomass in the marine environment. It is relatively simple and cost effective to measure when compared to phytoplankton abundance and is thus routinely included in many surveys. Here we collate 173, 333 records of chlorophyll a collected since 1965 from Australian waters gathered from researchers on regular coastal monitoring surveys and ocean voyages into a single repository. This dataset includes the chlorophyll a values as measured from samples analysed using spectrophotometry, fluorometry and high performance liquid chromatography (HPLC). The Australian Chlorophyll a database is freely available through the Australian Ocean Data Network portal (https://portal.aodn.org.au/). These data can be used in isolation as an index of phytoplankton biomass or in combination with other data to provide insight into water quality, ecosystem state, and relationships with other trophic levels such as zooplankton or fish.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29461516      PMCID: PMC5819481          DOI: 10.1038/sdata.2018.18

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Sci Data        ISSN: 2052-4463            Impact factor:   6.444


Background & Summary

As the pigment chlorophyll a is present in all photosynthetic phytoplankton species[1] and is relatively easy and cheap to measure, it has become a standard proxy for estimating phytoplankton biomass[2]. Samples require minimal processing and storage in the field and are not easily contaminated. Chlorophyll a is cheaper to process using spectrophotometry or fluorometry relative to estimating phytoplankton abundance/biomass using cell counts. Importantly, chlorophyll a measurements also account for the pico and nano plankton in the samples, which are substantially underestimated by phytoplankton analysts using light microscopy. These smaller size classes account for a significant fraction (commonly>70%) of total chlorophyll a biomass[3,4]. However, whilst using chlorophyll a as an estimate of phytoplankton biomass is widespread, the relationship between the two variables is complex. Not only does the carbon to chlorophyll ratio of phytoplankton vary with species and morphological characteristics, the chlorophyll a content of a phytoplankton cell per unit of organic matter will vary with light intensity, nutrient availability, temperature and cell age[5-8]. Despite these complexities chlorophyll a remains useful as a coarse proxy for phytoplankton biomass. In Australian waters chlorophyll a concentrations are generally lowest in the tropical and subtropical oceanic regions (0.05-0.5 μgL−1) and higher in the Southern Ocean and temperate regions (up to 1.5 μgL−1)[2]. In coastal zones, the chlorophyll a concentration can fluctuate greatly as phytoplankton blooms develop, peak and crash. The coastal station at Port Hacking, project number P782 in our database, is a good example where chlorophyll a concentrations typically vary between 0.1–8.0 μgL−1 over an annual cycle, with peaks sometimes up to 15 μgL−1 at 20–40 m depth coinciding with phytoplankton blooms[9]. In inshore estuaries and bays, high chlorophyll a values can also indicate the system is eutrophic with elevated nutrient levels from terrestrial run off. Chlorophyll a is therefore used in several water quality monitoring programs across the country (e.g. project number P1072 Ecosystem Health Monitoring Program in Moreton Bay, Queensland, Australia, http://healthywaterways.org/initatives/monitoring). Concentrations of chlorophyll a also vary throughout the oceans with oceanographic features such as upwelling and fronts which drive nutrients towards surface layers and thus enhance chlorophyll a levels[10,11]. Here we collate all available chlorophyll a data from Australian waters, gathered from researchers, students, government bodies, state agencies, councils and databases, along with the associated metadata through the process as detailed in Fig. 1. The chlorophyll a values are as measured and no attempt has been made to synthesise the data across analysis methods. The Australian Chlorophyll a database is available through the Australian Ocean Data Network portal (AODN: https://portal.aodn.org.au/), the main repository for marine data in Australia. The Australian Chlorophyll a Database will be maintained and updated through the CSIRO data centre, with periodic updates sent to the AODN. A snapshot of the Australian Chlorophyll a Database at the time of this publication has been assigned a DOI and will be maintained in perpetuity by the AODN (Data Citation 1).
Figure 1

Flow diagram of data collation, verification and release to AODN.

Methods

There are three standard methods for determining chlorophyll a concentrations in water samples: spectrophotometry, fluorometry and high performance liquid chromatography (HPLC). Spectrophotometric methods are described fully in Strickland and Parsons (1972)[12], fluorometry in Zeng (2015)[13], and HPLC in Shoaf (1978)[14]. A comprehensive discussion of the details of each method and its merits can be found in Manotura et al. (1997) and Roy et al. (2011)[15,16]. To measure chlorophyll a, a known volume of water sample is filtered through a glass fibre filter paper, typically 0.45-0.7 μm pore size, under a gentle vacuum. The volume filtered varies depending on the chlorophyll a concentration expected in the sample, with more water filtered at lower concentrations, but the volume should be sufficient to produce a green tinge on the filter paper. Chlorophyll a is extracted from the filter paper with an organic solvent (e.g. acetone). Concentrations are derived from a spectrophotometer to record the light absorbance at particular wavelengths or a fluorometer that transmits an excitation beam of light in the blue range (440–460 nm) and detects the light fluoresced by chlorophyll a in the red wavelength range (650–700 nm). This fluorescence is directly proportional to the concentration of chlorophyll a. For HPLC, the filter paper is similarly extracted with an organic solvent, however pigments are then separated by passing the extract through a chromatographic column and then measured either spectrophotometrically or fluorometrically. Although HPLC has become the accepted benchmark for the quantification of chlorophyll a the volume of data collated in this database shows that spectrophotometric and fluorometric extraction methods are much more commonly used (Fig. 2). HPLC has the advantages of being more accurate and also quantifies all the other accessory pigments but it does require specialised equipment and technical skills which make it more expensive. Spectrophotometry and fluorometry are simpler and effective, but unlike HPLC they do not differentiate between chlorophyll functional types and accessory pigments. To improve the spectrophotometric and fluorometric methods, an acidifying step (e.g. addition of a small amount of hydrochloric acid) can be added after the extraction to reduce errors associated with chlorophyll degradation products[2].
Figure 2

Histogram showing the range of samples over the data set period discriminated by sampling method.

All three methods require laboratory time and sample preparation, but in-water phytoplankton biomass can also be estimated using in-situ fluorometers. We have excluded such observations from the current dataset because chlorophyll a estimates from in-situ fluorometers are notoriously difficult to calibrate to an absolute standard. Although the accuracy of fluorometers is continually improving they require regular calibration, including against other methods[13]. The instruments are somewhat unstable and measurements are influenced by the presence of other environmental factors, particularly coloured dissolved organic matter (CDOM), diel, seasonal and regional effects and would also require correction for these factors[13]. The calibration routines must account for physical factors such as sensor drift, instrument design, biofouling etc. as well as the phytoplankton community composition and physiology in the sample environment, which may vary over space and time. Data collated for this database have come from many different sources, from long-term monitoring programs run by local governments concerned with water quality to ocean voyages on research vessels. Data have been standardised to μgL−1, and the collection and analysis methods have been included so that inter-project comparisons can be considered. We have collated data from researchers, local and state government agencies and regional databases, e.g. AESOP (The Australian-waters Earth Observation Phytoplankton-type products) database (http://aesop.csiro.au/). The database will be maintained by the CSIRO Data Centre and updates will be available periodically through the AODN.

Data Records

Each data record represents the chlorophyll a measurement taken at a point in space and time and has a unique record identification number, P(project_id)_(sample_id)_(record_id). Each data record belongs to a project, with each project having a unique identification number, Pxxx. A project is defined as a set of data records that have been collected together, usually as a cruise or study, and have the same sampling and analysis methods and the same person analysing the samples. Metadata ascribed to a project relates to all data records within that project. Details to identify each project, along with their associated samples, time and space information (Table 1 (available online only), Fig. 3) allow users to select and download discrete datasets in their area of interest. While each sample within a project has a unique sample_id, there may be more than one chlorophyll a record per sample if multiple replicates or depths were sampled. The sample_id has not been changed from the original data set to maintain traceability. Therefore P(project_id)_(sample_id) may be duplicated within projects, but the chlorophyll a records within that sample, taken at different depths for example, are given a unique record_id.
Table 1

Summary of the project data included in the data set

Project idProject NameCustodianAcknowledgementLocationProject startProject endNo recordsMethods
Where Ae=Acetone Extraction; Me=Methanol Extraction+Ac=Acidified+S=Spectrophotometry; F=Fluorometry        
1072Estuarine Marine Ecosystem Health Monitoring ProgramDavid Moffat (DSITI) Moreton Bay QLD2001-03-212002-02-2050140AeS det lim 0.1 or 0.5 μgL-1
1229Swan River monitoringMalcolm Robb (DOW)DOW WASwan River WA1979-03-212017-03-2044569AeS det lim 1 to 0.1 μgL-1
1073Historical ambient chl monitoring QueenslandAndrew Moss (DSITI) QLD1993-09-142013-02-2022690AeS det lim 1; 2; or 0.1 μgL-1
1071Central Queensland ambient Chl QueenslandAndrew Moss (DSITI) Central QLD2000-10-172015-03-1613524AeS det lim 0.1 or 0.5 μgL-1
806CRC Reef projectMiles Furnas (AIMS)GBRMPAGreat Barrier Reef QLD1986-02-072005-01-146532AeAcSF
1065Environmental Protection Agency VictoriaRenee Patten (EPA VIC)EPA VictoriaVIC2008-02-212014-07-223879AeS
1081NSW Estuaries ChlaPeter Scanes (Env NSW) NSW estuaries2007-07-162016-04-283803AeS or AeF
1122Coastal Zone Colour ScannerPublished literature Great Barrier Reef QLD1979-03-061981-07-273092AeF
1076GBR water qualitySam Talbot (AIMS)AIMSGreat Barrier Reef QLD2007-10-032015-07-263055AeAcf
969IDIOTS SAZ_SNARK BROKE SAZ_SENSE BROKEWEST CLIVAR KACTAS Southern Ocean Voyages[25]Simon Wright and AADC (AAD) Southern Ocean1996-01-202007-02-191999HPLC
1051Huon Estuary Study Huon River samplingLesley Clementson (CSIRO) Huon River TAS1996-07-021998-10-051799HPLC
1064Hornsby Council monitoringPeter Coad (Hornsby Council) Hornsby NSW1994-10-062015-06-231792AeS det lim 0.2 μgL-1
17North West Cape[23,24]Sam Talbot (AIMS) North West Cape WA1997-10-262003-04-211603AeAcf
1053SS2012_T06 SS2010_V05 SS2011_V04 SS2013_V04 SS2012_V04 Southern Surveyor Voyages[26–28]Anya Waite (UWA) West Coast Australia2010-07-102013-07-211202AeAcF; HPLC
7Scott Reef sampling[29]Sam Talbot (AIMS) Scott Reef WA2008-06-242009-12-041134AeAcf
1084ASAC project[30–37]Simon Wright and AADC (AAD) Southern Ocean1987-03-271997-11-10960HPLC
6Kimberley sampling[38]Sam Talbot (AIMS) Kimberley WA2011-01-202014-03-22953AeAcf
1126Productivity eastern GABPaul van Ruth (SARDI) GAB SA2004-02-142006-03-22838MeS
1080Noctiluca scintillans[39,40]Jocelyn Dela-Cruz (UNSW) Coastal NSW1998-09-021999-03-11809AeS det lim 0.3 μgL-1
599IMOS National Reference Stations[22]Anthony Richardson (CSIRO)IMOSAustralia2009-01-152016-08-22789HPLC
797Wet dry tropical estuary[41]Michele Burford (Griffith University)Tropical Rivers & Coastal Knowledge programGulf of Carpentaria QLD2008-10-202010-06-03551AeAc
1077Exchanges across the shelf-ocean boundarySam Talbot (AIMS)AIMSGreat Barrier Reef QLD2011-10-312014-06-18529AeAcf
1128Sydney HarbourDaniel Harrison (SIMS) Sydney Harbour NSW2012-10-172017-02-22527AeS
995SS072003 SS012004 SS032006 SS092004 SS2010_V09 Southern Surveyor Voyages[42]Lesley Clementson (CSIRO) South West Australia2003-08-232010-10-30490HPLC
509Gulf of Carpentaria phytoplankton[43–45]Michele Burford (Griffith University)FRDCGulf of Carpentaria QLD1986-04-082005-03-19458AeAcS
1031Biogeochemical dynamics of an intermittently open estuary[46]Jason Everett (UNSW) Smiths Lake NSW2002-10-032008-10-20420AeS
793SS2010_V01 SS2011_V02 Southern Surveyor VoyagesChristel Hassler (UNIGE) East Coast Australia2010-01-232011-06-01333HPLC
4Darwin HarbourSam Talbot (AIMS) Darwin Harbour NT2002-12-112004-12-08320AeAcf
1058Storm Bay monitoring programKerrie Swadling (IMAS) Storm Bay TAS2009-11-092015-04-22311AeS
782Port Hacking 100 m station Port Hacking 100 m station[10]Penelope Ajani (Macquarie University)IMOS / OEHPort Hacking NSW1997-04-032009-12-07301AeS
1082Ocean Colour validation eReefsLesley Clementson (CSIRO)IMOSGreat Barrier Reef QLD1999-01-152014-12-15248HPLC
972SOOP voyagesLesley Clementson (CSIRO) Australia1999-12-012000-10-09226HPLC
589Bloom monitoring programIan Jameson (CSIRO) Australia1993-01-141995-05-23220AeS
1025Two Rocks SRFME - Ocean colourLesley Clementson (CSIRO) Two Rocks WA2002-02-262004-12-17194HPLC
1059Continental ShelfSophie C. Leterme (Flinders University) East Coast Australia2011-01-282013-07-31175MeS
1074Mackay estuaries ambient chl monitoring QueenslandAndrew Moss (DSITI) Mackay QLD2014-10-162015-02-10144AeS det lim 0.1 μgL-1
988GBR_Sept2007 GBR VoyagesLesley Clementson (CSIRO) Great Barrier Reef QLD2005-08-232008-04-23135HPLC
796Phytoplankton abundance off New South WalesLinda Armbrecht (Macquarie University)IMOS / OEH / NSW MPA / NMSC / CSIROCoffs Harbour NSW2011-05-272012-09-18128HPLC
788SS072005 Southern Surveyor VoyagesPeter Thompson (CSIRO) West Coast Australia2005-07-212005-08-10125HPLC
1006TIP2000 Ocean Colour validationLesley Clementson (CSIRO) West Coast Australia2000-09-112000-10-01118HPLC
609Coorong Wetlands and Gulf St VincentSophie C. Leterme (Flinders University) Coorong Wetlands SA2010-07-012013-08-01110MeS
1075WAMSI SW Coastal BiogeographyJames McLaughlin (CSIRO)WAMSISouth Coast WA2007-02-202009-12-18109AeS
1130SS092006 SS102008[47,48]Jason Everett (UNSW) Tasman Sea2006-09-272008-10-18106AeS
1007North West ShelfLesley Clementson (CSIRO) North West Shelf WA1999-01-032003-07-17102HPLC
1013FR101997 Franklin VoyagesLesley Clementson (CSIRO) TAS1997-12-011997-12-0799HPLC
1134SS2012_T03 SS2012_T07[49]Martina Doblin (UTS) Australia2009-07-262013-08-0699HPLC
1027Bunbury_2002_2005 SRFME - Ocean colourLesley Clementson (CSIRO) Bunbury WA2003-03-042005-02-0292HPLC
980FRE_feb2008 FREsept2003 FREAug2004 FR200001_PNG FRE_feb05 Ocean Colour validationLesley Clementson (CSIRO) Central QLD2000-01-182008-02-0989HPLC
971Sniper voyages S1 to S7Lesley Clementson (CSIRO) SE QLD1999-08-162001-01-0888HPLC
1063UWA glidersPaul Thomson (UWA)IMOSWA2015-01-182016-01-2787HPLC
1050SS032010 Southern Surveyor VoyagesPeter Thompson (CSIRO) NW Shelf WA2010-04-152010-05-0487HPLC
786SS042007Peter Thompson (CSIRO) West Coast WA2007-05-162007-06-0483HPLC
1114Moreton Bay EHMPEmily Saeck (Griffith Uni)Healthy WaterwaysMoreton Bay QLD2009-05-282011-03-0378HPLC
999Tasmanian VoyagesLesley Clementson (CSIRO) TAS2007-05-212008-12-0478HPLC
479Moreton Bay floods spatial 2011Julian Uribe Palomino (CSIRO) Moreton Bay QLD2011-01-192011-12-2177HPLC
990Tonka voyages T1 to T8Lesley Clementson (CSIRO) SE QLD1997-07-101998-11-0975HPLC
1133FR14/1998[39,40]Iain Suthers (UNSW) East Coast Australia1998-11-161998-11-2068AeAcS
996JurienBay_2002_2005 SRFME - Ocean colourLesley Clementson (CSIRO) Jurien Bay WA2003-05-272005-02-2465HPLC
1060WAMSI dredgingJames McLaughlin (CSIRO)WAMSIKimberley WA2013-03-092015-02-2661AeS
1002Laurina Voyages P1 to P4 Ocean Colour validationLesley Clementson (CSIRO) NSW1997-09-101998-04-2754HPLC
1055Bonny and Du Coudeic CanyonsSasi Nayar (SARDI) Kangaroo Island SA2008-02-072008-02-2148AeS
1062Total Biodiversity StudyJames McLaughlin (CSIRO)Total FoundationKing George River WA2013-06-062013-06-1147AeS
1127Desalination projectPaul van Ruth (SARDI) Adelaide SA2009-06-122011-11-2142HPLC
1022AOCWG_Apr_2003 Ocean Colour validationLesley Clementson (CSIRO) West Coast Australia2003-04-142003-04-1739HPLC
591Moreton Bay plankton community dynamicsSarah Pausina (UQ)Healthy Waterways     
ARC LPO883663Moreton Bay QLD2009-02-042011-09-2839AeS   
985DtreeOct2003 DtreeApr2004 Daintree samplesLesley Clementson (CSIRO) Daintree QLD2003-09-292004-04-0334HPLC
1015LB3172 Ocean Colour validationLesley Clementson (CSIRO) Central QLD2002-10-212002-10-2934HPLC
1113North West BayLesley Clementson (CSIRO) North West Bay TAS2006-10-022006-10-0331HPLC
1125Roles of viruses in coral reef systemsNicole Patten (SARDI) Heron Island GBR QLD2005-11-172005-11-2730AeF
1061WAMSI KimberleyJames McLaughlin (CSIRO)WAMSIKimberley WA2014-04-012015-04-2130AeS
979Moreton Bay SamplesLesley Clementson (CSIRO) Moreton Bay QLD2003-01-282003-01-3127HPLC
1069FR051995 Franklin VoyagesPeter Thompson (CSIRO) West Coast Australia1995-06-141995-06-1524HPLC
786SS042007 Southern Surveyor VoyagesPeter Thompson (CSIRO) West Coast Australia2007-05-162007-06-0424HPLC
986Beagle samples legs1;5;6Lesley Clementson (CSIRO) South West Australia2003-08-042004-02-1723HPLC
993Townsville_GBR_Jun2002 Ocean Colour validationLesley Clementson (CSIRO) Townsville QLD2002-06-052002-06-1220HPLC
1024Elena_Rose_May_1997 Ocean Colour validationLesley Clementson (CSIRO) NSW1997-05-141997-05-1511HPLC
1020HImay04 Ocean Colour validationLesley Clementson (CSIRO) Central QLD2004-05-192004-05-248HPLC
Figure 3

Sample locations mapped by analysis type, by HPLC and by spectrophotometry and fluorescence.

Each data record has been quality controlled. Data with insufficient or unreliable metadata were removed. All depths, times and locations have been validated and are within the boundaries expected for each project.

Technical Validation

The database has been constructed to ensure data extraction is straight forward, although the user needs to be aware of two caveats. First, if chlorophyll b or other pigments are present, then fluorometry may underestimate or spectrophotometry overestimate the chlorophyll a concentration relative to HPLC[17-19]. When an acidification step is included, the accuracy of chlorophyll a from spectrophotometric and fluorometric methods is improved as effects of chlorophyll degradation products are reduced[18]. Without further pigment information comparisons between methods need to be carefully considered. This database reports values as measured and does not attempt to compare values across methods, leaving this to the discretion of the user. Second, for the HPLC data we are reporting the sum of the chlorophyll a pigments including the divinyl chlorophyll a components. The user should thus be careful when comparing data across datasets where different analysis methods have been used. Metadata have been provided in as much detail as is available so the user is aware of methodological details specific to the project. Chlorophyll a values can be reported in micrograms per litre (μgL−1), milligrams per cubic metre (mgm−3) (1 μgL−1=1 mgm−3) or as depth integrated values, i.e. per square metre (mgm−2). In this data set we have standardised to μgL−1. Where depth integrated values were given, the appropriate sample depth from the study was used to convert to μgL−1. All times have been converted to Coordinated Universal Time, UTC. Dates with no time component remain as reported. The value −999 has been assigned to values that were below detection limits. The detection limit has also been included, where known, in the sample_method field of the metadata table.

Usage Notes

This dataset and metadata has been made freely available through the AODN (Data Citation 1). The Australian Chlorophyll a database is complementary to the Australian Zooplankton Database[20] and the Australian Phytoplankton Database[21], both of which provide species-level data and are available through the AODN. Many projects in this data set have corresponding data in these species level databases and can be matched to the project via Project_id and to individual samples, via sample_id, or by using the time and date information. For example, the project 599 has data on zooplankton and phytoplankton composition, included in the aforementioned databases, plus chlorophyll a data in the current data set. Because the three data sets were collected at the same locations and times as part of the Integrated Marine Observing System (IMOS) National Reference Stations (NRS), they can be analysed together to investigate relationships among different trophic levels. These combined data have been used in an analysis of climate-driven variability contrasting the 2010 El Niño with the 2011 La Niña[22]. Further examples of using chlorophyll data in partnership with species-level phytoplankton and zooplankton data using data are from project 17 in the North West Cape, Western Australia[23,24]. Projects 599, 1063, 1064, 1065, 1071, 1072, 1074, 1078 and 1129 are ongoing, and data will continue to be added to the Australian chlorophyll a database; for further information, contact the data custodian as listed in the metadata. The most updated version of P599 IMOS National Reference Stations, is available at: https://portal.aodn.org.au/search?uuid=f48531e2-f182-56ca-e043-08114f8c7f2e.

Additional information

How to cite this article: Davies, C. H. et al. A database of chlorophyll a in Australian waters. Sci. Data 5:180018 doi: 10.1038/sdata.2017.18 (2018). Publisher’s note: Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
  1 in total

1.  Corrigendum: A database of marine phytoplankton abundance, biomass and species composition in Australian waters.

Authors:  Claire H Davies; Alex Coughlan; Gustaaf Hallegraeff; Penelope Ajani; Linda Armbrecht; Natalia Atkins; Prudence Bonham; Steve Brett; Richard Brinkman; Michele Burford; Lesley Clementson; Peter Coad; Frank Coman; Diana Davies; Jocelyn Dela-Cruz; Michelle Devlin; Steven Edgar; Ruth Eriksen; Miles Furnas; Christel Hassler; David Hill; Michael Holmes; Tim Ingleton; Ian Jameson; Sophie C Leterme; Christian Lønborg; James McLaughlin; Felicity McEnnulty; A David McKinnon; Margaret Miller; Shauna Murray; Sasi Nayar; Renee Patten; Tim Pritchard; Roger Proctor; Diane Purcell-Meyerink; Eric Raes; David Rissik; Jason Ruszczyk; Anita Slotwinski; Kerrie M Swadling; Katherine Tattersall; Peter Thompson; Paul Thomson; Mark Tonks; Thomas W Trull; Julian Uribe-Palomino; Anya M Waite; Rouna Yauwenas; Anthony Zammit; Anthony J Richardson
Journal:  Sci Data       Date:  2016-12-06       Impact factor: 6.444

  1 in total
  1 in total

1.  Quantitative Link Between Sedimentary Chlorin and Sea-Surface Chlorophyll-a.

Authors:  M Raja; A Rosell-Melé
Journal:  J Geophys Res Biogeosci       Date:  2022-04-25       Impact factor: 4.432

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.