OBJECTIVES: The surgical reduction of intra-articular olecranon fractures is judged primarily on the lateral elbow radiograph, as orthogonal imaging of the articular surface is not obtainable. We sought to determine surgeon accuracy in identifying intra-articular olecranon malreductions on the lateral elbow radiograph. METHODS: Six human fresh-frozen cadaveric elbow specimens were sagittally sectioned in 5-mm increments after olecranon dissection, preservation of soft tissue envelope, and rigid fixation of the elbow in an external fixator. Three patterns of central intra-articular olecranon malreduction were created in each elbow using a ruler and bone saw. Perfect lateral elbow radiographs were taken of each malreduction, and these images were randomized along with x-rays of normal cadaveric olecranons. The image series was presented to 4 masked trauma-trained surgeons to determine whether the olecranon was malreduced or anatomic. Surgeons interpreted the same image series on 2 separate occasions separated by 6 weeks. Percent correct was recorded, and the interobserver and intraobserver reliability was calculated. RESULTS: Orthopedic trauma surgeons correctly identified olecranon malreductions only 73% of the time on the lateral elbow radiograph. Interobserver agreement was moderate for the first review of images and fair for the second review, with respective Fleiss Kappa values of 0.43 and 0.28. Intrarater reliability revealed moderate agreement with Cohen's Kappa value ranging from 0.56 to 0.66. CONCLUSIONS: Intra-articular olecranon malreductions are inconsistently recognized by trauma surgeons on the lateral elbow radiograph. Therefore, articular incongruity may still be present after surgical fixation of comminuted olecranon fractures. We must further define the radiographic anatomic representation of the articular olecranon to improve surgical reduction and clinical outcomes.
OBJECTIVES: The surgical reduction of intra-articular olecranon fractures is judged primarily on the lateral elbow radiograph, as orthogonal imaging of the articular surface is not obtainable. We sought to determine surgeon accuracy in identifying intra-articular olecranon malreductions on the lateral elbow radiograph. METHODS: Six human fresh-frozen cadaveric elbow specimens were sagittally sectioned in 5-mm increments after olecranon dissection, preservation of soft tissue envelope, and rigid fixation of the elbow in an external fixator. Three patterns of central intra-articular olecranon malreduction were created in each elbow using a ruler and bone saw. Perfect lateral elbow radiographs were taken of each malreduction, and these images were randomized along with x-rays of normal cadaveric olecranons. The image series was presented to 4 masked trauma-trained surgeons to determine whether the olecranon was malreduced or anatomic. Surgeons interpreted the same image series on 2 separate occasions separated by 6 weeks. Percent correct was recorded, and the interobserver and intraobserver reliability was calculated. RESULTS:Orthopedic trauma surgeons correctly identified olecranon malreductions only 73% of the time on the lateral elbow radiograph. Interobserver agreement was moderate for the first review of images and fair for the second review, with respective Fleiss Kappa values of 0.43 and 0.28. Intrarater reliability revealed moderate agreement with Cohen's Kappa value ranging from 0.56 to 0.66. CONCLUSIONS:Intra-articular olecranon malreductions are inconsistently recognized by trauma surgeons on the lateral elbow radiograph. Therefore, articular incongruity may still be present after surgical fixation of comminuted olecranon fractures. We must further define the radiographic anatomic representation of the articular olecranon to improve surgical reduction and clinical outcomes.
Authors: Kaare S Midtgaard; Frede Frihagen; Grant J Dornan; Marius Coucheron; Carina Fossåen; Dag Grundel; Christopher Gundersen; Stian Kristoffersen; Erik Sundqvist; Leonore Wünsche; Jan Erik Madsen; Gunnar B Flugsrud Journal: JSES Int Date: 2021-05-21