Literature DB >> 29460705

A single center retrospective cohort study comparing low-molecular-weight heparins to direct oral anticoagulants for the treatment of venous thromboembolism in patients with cancer - A real world experience.

Megan K Phelps1, Tracy E Wiczer1, H Paige Erdeljac1, Kelsey R Van Deusen1, Kyle Porter2, Gary Philips2, Tzu-Fei Wang3.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Low-molecular-weight heparins are the standard treatment for cancer-associated thrombosis. Recently, direct oral anticoagulants are a new option for thrombosis treatment; however, data supporting the use of direct oral anticoagulants for cancer-associated thrombosis are limited.
OBJECTIVES: The primary objective of this study was to determine the rate of recurrent cancer-associated thrombosis and major bleeding within 6 months of starting either low-molecular-weight heparin or direct oral anticoagulant for treatment of cancer-associated thrombosis. Secondary objectives were to determine the rates of clinically relevant-non-major bleeding and all-cause mortality. PATIENTS/
METHODS: This is a retrospective cohort study including adults with cancer-associated thrombosis treated with low-molecular-weight heparin or direct oral anticoagulant between 2010 and 2016 at the Ohio State University. Medical records were reviewed for 6 months after initiation of anticoagulation or until the occurrence of recurrent cancer-associated thrombosis, major bleeding, cessation of anticoagulation of interest, or death, whichever occurred first.
RESULTS: Four hundred and eighty patients were included (290 low-molecular-weight heparin and 190 direct oral anticoagulant). Patients treated with direct oral anticoagulant were found to carry "lower risk" features including cancer with lower VTE risk and lower rate of metastatic disease. After adjustment for baseline differences, there was no significant difference in the rate of recurrent cancer-associated thrombosis (7.2% low-molecular-weight heparin vs 6.3% direct oral anticoagulant, p = 0.71) or major bleeding (7.6% low-molecular-weight heparin vs 2.6% direct oral anticoagulant, p = 0.08).
CONCLUSIONS: Our study demonstrates that in a select population of cancer patients with VTE, direct oral anticoagulant use can be as effective and safe compared to the standard therapy with low-molecular-weight heparin.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Low-molecular-weight heparin; anticoagulants; bleeding; cancer; venous thromboembolism

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29460705     DOI: 10.1177/1078155218757856

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Oncol Pharm Pract        ISSN: 1078-1552            Impact factor:   1.809


  6 in total

Review 1.  Treatment of cancer-associated venous thromboembolism in the age of direct oral anticoagulants.

Authors:  C Ay; J Beyer-Westendorf; I Pabinger
Journal:  Ann Oncol       Date:  2019-06-01       Impact factor: 32.976

2.  Treatment of venous thromboembolism in cancer patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis on the efficacy and safety of different direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs).

Authors:  Xiaojun Song; Zhili Liu; Rong Zeng; Jiang Shao; Bao Liu; Yuehong Zheng; Changwei Liu; Wei Ye
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2021-01

3.  Comparison Between Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulants and Low-Molecular-Weight Heparin in Asian Individuals With Cancer-Associated Venous Thromboembolism.

Authors:  Dong-Yi Chen; Chi-Nan Tseng; Ming-Jer Hsieh; Wen-Ching Lan; Cheng-Keng Chuang; See-Tong Pang; Shao-Wei Chen; Tien-Hsing Chen; Shang-Hung Chang; I-Chang Hsieh; Pao-Hsien Chu; Ming-Shien Wen; Jen-Shi Chen; John Wen-Cheng Chang; Lai-Chu See; Wen-Kuan Huang
Journal:  JAMA Netw Open       Date:  2021-02-01

4.  Direct versus conventional anticoagulants for treatment of cancer associated thrombosis: a pooled and interaction analysis between observational studies and randomized clinical trials.

Authors:  Zhi-Chun Gu; Yi-Dan Yan; Sheng-Yan Yang; Long Shen; Ling-Cong Kong; Chi Zhang; An-Hua Wei; Zheng Li; Xin-Hua Wang; Hou-Wen Lin
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2020-02

5.  Efficacy and safety of direct oral anticoagulants for secondary prevention of cancer associated thrombosis: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

Authors:  Ruchi Desai; Gautam Krishna Koipallil; Nelson Thomas; Rahul Mhaskar; Nathan Visweshwar; Damian Laber; Ankita Patel; Michael Jaglal
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-11-03       Impact factor: 4.379

Review 6.  Direct oral anticoagulants for the treatment and prevention of venous thromboembolism in patients with cancer: current evidence.

Authors:  I García-Escobar; E Brozos-Vázquez; D Gutierrez Abad; V Martínez-Marín; V Pachón; A J Muñoz Martín
Journal:  Clin Transl Oncol       Date:  2020-11-18       Impact factor: 3.405

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.