Literature DB >> 29460685

Prognostic Value of Lymph Node Yield and Density in Head and Neck Malignancies.

Shayan Cheraghlou1, Michael Otremba1,2, Phoebe Kuo Yu1, George O Agogo3, Denise Hersey4, Benjamin L Judson1,2.   

Abstract

Objective Studies have suggested that the lymph node yield and lymph node density from selective or elective neck dissections are predictive of patient outcomes and may be used for patient counseling, treatment planning, or quality measurement. Our objective was to systematically review the literature and conduct a meta-analysis of studies that investigated the prognostic significance of lymph node yield and/or lymph node density after neck dissection for patients with head and neck cancer. Data Sources The Ovid/Medline, Ovid/Embase, and NLM PubMed databases were systematically searched on January 23, 2017, for articles published between January 1, 1946, and January 23, 2017. Review Methods We reviewed English-language original research that included survival analysis of patients undergoing neck dissection for a head and neck malignancy stratified by lymph node yield and/or lymph node density. Study data were extracted by 2 independent researchers (S.C. and M.O.). We utilized the DerSimonian and Laird random effects model to account for heterogeneity of studies. Results Our search yielded 350 nonduplicate articles, with 23 studies included in the final synthesis. Pooled results demonstrated that increased lymph node yield was associated with a significant improvement in survival (hazard ratio, 0.833; 95% CI, 0.790-0.879). Additionally, we found that increased lymph node density was associated with poorer survival (hazard ratio, 1.916; 95% CI, 1.637-2.241). Conclusions Increased nodal yield portends improved outcomes and may be a valuable quality indicator for neck dissections, while increased lymph node density is associated with diminished survival and may be used for postsurgical counseling and planning for adjuvant therapy.

Entities:  

Keywords:  head and neck cancer; lymph node ratio; lymph node yield; prognostic value; systematic review

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29460685     DOI: 10.1177/0194599818756830

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg        ISSN: 0194-5998            Impact factor:   3.497


  10 in total

1.  Evaluation of Lymph Node Ratio Association With Long-term Patient Survival After Surgery for Node-Positive Merkel Cell Carcinoma.

Authors:  Shayan Cheraghlou; George O Agogo; Michael Girardi
Journal:  JAMA Dermatol       Date:  2019-07-01       Impact factor: 10.282

2.  Prognostic significance of lymph node yield and lymph node ratio in patients affected by squamous cell carcinoma of the oral cavity and oropharynx: Study protocol for a prospective, multicenter, observational study.

Authors:  Oreste Iocca; Alessio Farcomeni; Armando De Virgilio; Pasquale Di Maio; Paweł Golusinski; Luca Malvezzi; Raul Pellini; Wojciech Golusinski; Christopher H Rassekh; Giuseppe Spriano
Journal:  Contemp Clin Trials Commun       Date:  2019-01-14

3.  Prognostic value of the nodal yield in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma: A systematic review.

Authors:  Willem W B de Kort; Sybren L N Maas; Robert J J Van Es; Stefan M Willems
Journal:  Head Neck       Date:  2019-04-10       Impact factor: 3.147

4.  Prognostic value of lymph node ratio in laryngeal and hypopharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Arikin Abdeyrim; Shizhi He; Yang Zhang; Gulbostan Mamtali; Aibadla Asla; Mirkamil Yusup; Jiang Liu
Journal:  J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2020-05-29

5.  Clinical, ultrasound and histopathological correlation of clinically N0 neck nodes in patients with cancers of the pharynx and larynx.

Authors:  Gheorghe Iovănescu; Florin Bîrsăşteanu; Veronica Mădălina Borugă; Adrian Apostol; Eugen Horaţiu Ştefănescu; Vlad Andrei Budu; Flavia Baderca; Simona Corina Trifu; Carmen Aurelia Mogoantă; Diana Camelia Bonţe; Mihaela Viviana Ivan
Journal:  Rom J Morphol Embryol       Date:  2020 Apr-Jun       Impact factor: 1.033

6.  Endoscope-assisted versus conventional neck dissection in patients with oral cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Yi-Chan Lee; Li-Jen Hsin; Shih-Wei Yang; Ming-Shao Tsai; Yao-Te Tsai; Che-Fang Ho
Journal:  J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2022-05-11

Review 7.  Treatment Options in Early Stage (Stage I and II) of Oropharyngeal Cancer: A Narrative Review.

Authors:  Giuseppe Meccariello; Andrea Catalano; Giovanni Cammaroto; Giannicola Iannella; Claudio Vicini; Sheng-Po Hao; Andrea De Vito
Journal:  Medicina (Kaunas)       Date:  2022-08-04       Impact factor: 2.948

8.  Lymph Node Yield and Ratio in Selective and Modified Radical Neck Dissection in Head and Neck Cancer-Impact on Oncological Outcome.

Authors:  Sean C Sheppard; Lukas Frech; Roland Giger; Lluís Nisa
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2021-05-04       Impact factor: 6.639

9.  Microscopic Extranodal Extension in HPV-Negative Head and Neck Cancer and the Role of Adjuvant Chemoradiation.

Authors:  Flora Yan; Hong Li; John R de Almeida; John M Kaczmar; Patrik Pipkorn; Joseph Zenga; Mary S Richardson; David M Neskey; Anand K Sharma; Terry A Day; Evan M Graboyes
Journal:  Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2021-02-23       Impact factor: 5.591

10.  Better outcome for parotid versus neck metastasis of head and neck cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma: a new report on reemerging data.

Authors:  Fábio Muradás Girardi; Vivian Petersen Wagner; Manoela Domingues Martins; Aliende Lengler Abentroth; Luiz Alberto Hauth
Journal:  Braz J Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2019-11-15
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.