| Literature DB >> 29460668 |
Donna T Chen1, Tomohiro M Ko1, Ashleigh A Allen1, Richard J Bonnie1, Colleen E Suratt1, Paul S Appelbaum2,3, Edward V Nunes2,3, Peter D Friedmann4, Joshua D Lee5, Michael S Gordon6, Ryan McDonald5, Donna Wilson4, Tamara Y Boney7, Sean M Murphy8, Charles P O'Brien9.
Abstract
Individuals must feel free to exert personal control over decisions regarding research participation. We present an examination of participants' perceived personal control over, as well as reported pressures and threats from others, influencing their decision to join a study assessing the effectiveness of extended-release naltrexone in preventing opioid dependence relapse. Most participants endorsed a strong sense of control over the decision; few reported pressures or threats. Although few in number, participants' brief narrative descriptions of the pressures and threats are illuminating and provide context for their perceptions of personal control. Based on this work, we propose a useful set of tools to help ascertain participants' sense of personal control in joining research.Entities:
Keywords: criminal justice supervision; decision making; perceived personal control; research ethics; substance use disorder
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2018 PMID: 29460668 PMCID: PMC6693513 DOI: 10.1177/1556264618755243
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics ISSN: 1556-2646 Impact factor: 1.742