Literature DB >> 29460251

Comparison of emerging contaminants in receiving waters downstream of a conventional wastewater treatment plant and a forest-water reuse system.

Andrew D McEachran1, Melanie L Hedgespeth2, Seth R Newton3, Rebecca McMahen4, Mark Strynar3, Damian Shea5, Elizabeth Guthrie Nichols2.   

Abstract

Forest-water reuse (FWR) systems treat municipal, industrial, and agricultural wastewaters via land application to forest soils. Previous studies have shown that both large-scale conventional wastewater treatment plants (WWTPs) and FWR systems do not completely remove many contaminants of emerging concern (CECs) before release of treated wastewater. To better characterize CECs and potential for increased implementation of FWR systems, FWR systems need to be directly compared to conventional WWTPs. In this study, both a quantitative, targeted analysis and a nontargeted analysis were utilized to better understand how CECs release to waterways from an FWR system compared to a conventional treatment system. Quantitatively, greater concentrations and total mass load of CECs was exhibited downstream of the conventional WWTP compared to the FWR. Average summed concentrations of 33 targeted CECs downstream of the conventional system were ~ 1000 ng/L and downstream of the FWR were ~ 30 ng/L. From a nontargeted chemical standpoint, more tentatively identified chemicals were present, and at a greater relative abundance, downstream of the conventional system as well. Frequently occurring contaminants included phthalates, pharmaceuticals, and industrial chemicals. These data indicate that FWR systems represent a sustainable wastewater treatment alternative and that emerging contaminant release to waterways was lower at a FWR system than a conventional WWTP.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Contaminants of emerging concern (CECs); Forest-water reuse; Nontargeted analysis; Surface water; Wastewater; Water reuse

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29460251      PMCID: PMC6739829          DOI: 10.1007/s11356-018-1505-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int        ISSN: 0944-1344            Impact factor:   4.223


  53 in total

1.  The occurrence of selected pharmaceuticals in wastewater effluent and surface waters of the lower Tyne catchment.

Authors:  Paul H Roberts; Kevin V Thomas
Journal:  Sci Total Environ       Date:  2005-06-02       Impact factor: 7.963

2.  Pharmaceuticals in a temperate forest-water reuse system.

Authors:  Andrew D McEachran; Damian Shea; Elizabeth Guthrie Nichols
Journal:  Sci Total Environ       Date:  2017-01-08       Impact factor: 7.963

3.  Identifying small molecules via high resolution mass spectrometry: communicating confidence.

Authors:  Emma L Schymanski; Junho Jeon; Rebekka Gulde; Kathrin Fenner; Matthias Ruff; Heinz P Singer; Juliane Hollender
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2014-01-29       Impact factor: 9.028

4.  Hydrologic Impacts of Municipal Wastewater Irrigation to a Temperate Forest Watershed.

Authors:  Andrew L Birch; Ryan E Emanuel; April L James; Elizabeth Guthrie Nichols
Journal:  J Environ Qual       Date:  2016-07       Impact factor: 2.751

5.  Suspect screening and non-targeted analysis of drinking water using point-of-use filters.

Authors:  Seth R Newton; Rebecca L McMahen; Jon R Sobus; Kamel Mansouri; Antony J Williams; Andrew D McEachran; Mark J Strynar
Journal:  Environ Pollut       Date:  2017-11-26       Impact factor: 8.071

6.  Antidepressants and their metabolites in municipal wastewater, and downstream exposure in an urban watershed.

Authors:  Chris D Metcalfe; Shaogang Chu; Colin Judt; Hongxia Li; Ken D Oakes; Mark R Servos; David M Andrews
Journal:  Environ Toxicol Chem       Date:  2010-01       Impact factor: 3.742

7.  Waterborne and sediment toxicity of fluoxetine to select organisms.

Authors:  Bryan W Brooks; Philip K Turner; Jacob K Stanley; James J Weston; Elizabeth A Glidewell; Christy M Foran; Marc Slattery; Thomas W La Point; Duane B Huggett
Journal:  Chemosphere       Date:  2003-07       Impact factor: 7.086

8.  The occurrence of pharmaceuticals, personal care products, endocrine disruptors and illicit drugs in surface water in South Wales, UK.

Authors:  Barbara Kasprzyk-Hordern; Richard M Dinsdale; Alan J Guwy
Journal:  Water Res       Date:  2008-05-10       Impact factor: 11.236

9.  Linking high resolution mass spectrometry data with exposure and toxicity forecasts to advance high-throughput environmental monitoring.

Authors:  Julia E Rager; Mark J Strynar; Shuang Liang; Rebecca L McMahen; Ann M Richard; Christopher M Grulke; John F Wambaugh; Kristin K Isaacs; Richard Judson; Antony J Williams; Jon R Sobus
Journal:  Environ Int       Date:  2016-01-23       Impact factor: 9.621

Review 10.  Integrating tools for non-targeted analysis research and chemical safety evaluations at the US EPA.

Authors:  Jon R Sobus; John F Wambaugh; Kristin K Isaacs; Antony J Williams; Andrew D McEachran; Ann M Richard; Christopher M Grulke; Elin M Ulrich; Julia E Rager; Mark J Strynar; Seth R Newton
Journal:  J Expo Sci Environ Epidemiol       Date:  2017-12-29       Impact factor: 5.563

View more
  1 in total

1.  The challenge of removing waste from wastewater: let technology use nature!

Authors:  Olga C Nunes
Journal:  Microb Biotechnol       Date:  2020-11-22       Impact factor: 5.813

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.