| Literature DB >> 29459583 |
Yuji Fujimoto1, Yoshito Tomimaru1, Hisanori Hatano1,2, Kozo Noguchi1, Hirotsugu Nagase1, Atsushi Hamabe1, Masashi Hirota1, Kazuteru Oshima1, Tsukasa Tanida1, Shunji Morita1, Hiroshi Imamura1, Takashi Iwazawa1, Kenzo Akagi1, Keizo Dono1.
Abstract
BACKGROUND Cystic artery pseudoaneurysm is rare, and some cases are associated with inflammation of the gallbladder. There is limited information regarding this condition, and the clinical features remain unclear. This report is a case of ruptured cystic artery pseudoaneurysm diagnosed by computed tomography (CT) imaging and treated with urgent cholecystectomy and is supported by a literature review of previous cases. CASE REPORT A 90-year-old man, who had developed acute cholecystitis due to a gallstone one month previously, was referred to our hospital. He developed fever and epigastric pain while waiting for a scheduled elective cholecystectomy. Laboratory investigations showed elevated markers of inflammation and elevated hepatobiliary enzyme levels. Computed tomography (CT) imaging showed cholecystitis and pseudoaneurysm of the cystic artery. The pseudoaneurysm had ruptured and was accompanied by the formation of a hematoma within the gallbladder that involved the liver bed. Having made the preoperative diagnosis, an urgent open laparotomy was performed, during which the gallbladder was found to have perforated. The hematoma penetrated into the liver bed. Cholecystectomy was performed, and the pseudoaneurysm of the cystic artery was extirpated. There were no serious postoperative complications. A literature review identified 50 previously reported case of cystic artery pseudoaneurysm. CONCLUSIONS A case of ruptured cystic artery pseudoaneurysm, successfully treated with urgent cholecystectomy is reported, supported by a literature review of previous cases and characterization of the clinical features of this rare condition.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2018 PMID: 29459583 PMCID: PMC5829622 DOI: 10.12659/ajcr.907273
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Am J Case Rep ISSN: 1941-5923
Figure 1.Preoperative computed tomography (CT) findings. (A) A gallstone measuring 29 mm in diameter is present in the gallbladder. The lumen of the gallbladder and the common bile duct (CBD) are shown as high-density areas. (B, C) Contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CT) images show extensive inflammation of the fat (fat necrosis) surrounding the gallbladder and the area of spread of the hematoma into the liver bed (B axial scan; C coronal scan), An 8mm nodular lesion is also shown on the cystic artery. (D) Three-dimensional (3-D) CT angiography confirmed the nodular lesion.
Figure 2.Intraoperative appearance of the gallbladder at laparotomy. At laparotomy, the lumen of the gallbladder, and the penetrated space in the liver bed were filled with blood (arrow: lumen of the gallbladder).
Reported cases of cystic artery pseudoaneurysm.
| 1 | Hakami et al. [ | 1976 | 56 | M | NA | + | + | + | − | OC |
| 2 | Reddy et al. [ | 1983 | 61 | M | 30 | + | + | + | − | OC |
| 3 | Rhee et al. [ | 1987 | 73 | M | NA | + | + | + | + | OC |
| 4 | Wu et al. [ | 1988 | 64 | M | 30 | + | + | + | + | OC |
| 5 | Strickland et al. [ | 1991 | 72 | F | NA | + | + | + | − | OC |
| 6 | Read et al. [ | 1991 | 71 | F | 10 | + | + | + | − | OC |
| 7 | Barba et al. [ | 1994 | 70 | M | 20 | + | + | + | − | TAE + OC |
| 8 | Nakajima et al. [ | 1996 | 72 | M | 30 | + | + | + | − | OC |
| 9 | England et al. [ | 1998 | 71 | F | NA | + | + | + | − | TAE + OC |
| 10 | Kaman et al. [ | 1998 | 32 | F | 10 | + | + | + | − | OC |
| 11 | Maeda et al. [ | 2002 | 62 | M | NA | + | + | + | − | TAE + OC |
| 12 | Gutiérrez et al. [ | 2004 | 66 | F | NA | + | + | + | − | TAE + OC |
| 13 | Morioka et al. [ | 2004 | 43 | M | NA | + | + | + | − | OC |
| 14 | Joyce et al. [ | 2006 | 58 | M | 2 | + | − | + | − | OC |
| 15 | Sibulesky et al. [ | 2006 | 72 | M | NA | NA | − | + | − | OC |
| 16 | Lee et al. [ | 2006 | 72 | F | NA | + | + | + | − | TAE + OC |
| 17 | Pérez-Castri et al. [ | 2006 | 77 | F | NA | + | NA | + | − | TAE |
| 18 | Saluja et al. [ | 2007 | 43 | F | 30 | + | + | + | − | OC |
| 19 | Akatsu et al. [ | 2007 | 58 | M | 20 | + | + | + | − | OC |
| 20 | Ghoz et al. [ | 2007 | 63 | M | NA | + | − | + | + | TAE + OC |
| 21 | Shimada et al. [ | 2008 | 68 | M | NA | + | NA | + | − | TAE + OC |
| 22 | Machida et al. [ | 2008 | 71 | M | 10 | + | + | − | − | OC |
| 23 | Sousa et al. [ | 2009 | 84 | M | 14 | + | + | + | − | OC |
| 24 | Mullen et al. [ | 2009 | 82 | M | NA | + | + | − | − | TAE |
| 25 | Mullen et al. [ | 2009 | 75 | F | 21 | + | + | + | − | TAE |
| 26 | Desai et al. [ | 2010 | 78 | F | 25 | + | + | + | − | TAE |
| 27 | Nkwam et al. [ | 2010 | 71 | M | 30 | + | + | − | − | TAE + LC |
| 28 | Leung et al. [ | 2010 | 82 | M | NA | NA | NA | + | − | TAE |
| 29 | Hague et al. [ | 2010 | 83 | M | NA | NA | NA | + | + | TAE |
| 30 | Hague et al. [ | 2010 | 79 | M | NA | + | + | + | − | TAE |
| 31 | Hague et al. [ | 2010 | 83 | M | NA | NA | NA | NA | + | TAE |
| 32 | Ahmed et al. [ | 2010 | 54 | M | 20 | + | + | + | + | TAE + OC |
| 33 | Anand et al. [ | 2011 | 35 | M | 21 | + | − | + | − | OC |
| 34 | Siddiqui et al. [ | 2011 | 58 | M | NA | + | + | + | + | TAE + OC |
| 35 | Chong et al. [ | 2012 | 56 | M | 20 | NA | NA | + | − | TAE + OC |
| 36 | Dewachter et al. [ | 2012 | 74 | F | 20 | + | + | − | − | LC |
| 37 | Mokrane et al. [ | 2013 | 67 | M | NA | + | NA | + | − | TAE |
| 38 | Fung et al. [ | 2013 | 64 | M | NA | + | + | + | + | OC |
| 39 | Nana et al. [ | 2013 | 79 | F | 25 | + | + | + | − | TAE |
| 40 | Nana et al. [ | 2013 | 74 | M | NA | + | + | + | − | TAE + LC |
| 41 | Liang et al. [ | 2013 | 88 | F | NA | + | + | + | + | OC |
| 42 | Suzuki et al. [ | 2013 | 85 | F | 10 | + | + | − | − | OC |
| 43 | Glaysher et al. [ | 2014 | 86 | M | 20 | + | + | + | − | OC |
| 44 | Kulkarni et al. [ | 2014 | 55 | M | NA | + | + | + | − | TAE + OC |
| 45 | She et al. [ | 2015 | 64 | M | NA | + | + | + | − | TAE + OC |
| 46 | Shelmerdine et al. [ | 2015 | 72 | M | 6 | + | + | + | − | TAE |
| 47 | Muñoz-Villafranca et al. [ | 2015 | 74 | M | 18 | + | + | + | − | TAE |
| 48 | Loizides et al. [ | 2015 | 61 | F | 15 | + | + | − | − | LC |
| 49 | Alis et al. [ | 2016 | 36 | M | NA | + | + | − | − | LC |
| 50 | Lozano-Cruz et al. [ | 2017 | 85 | F | NA | + | + | + | − | TAE |
| 51 | Our case | 2017 | 90 | M | 8 | + | + | + | − | OC |
| Summary of the 51 cases | 68±14 | M; 69% (35/51) | 19±8 | +: 100% (46/46) | +: 91% (40/44) | +: 86% (43/50) | +: 18% (9/51) | OC: 87% (33/38) |
Data are summarized below and some data in the summary are expressed as mean ± standard deviation. M – male; F – female; LC – laparoscopic cholecystectomy; OC – open cholecystectomy; TAE – transcatheter arterial embolization; NA – not assigned.