Jan-Willem Balder1,2, Antoine Rimbert1, Xiang Zhang3, Martijn Viel4, Roan Kanninga4, Freerk van Dijk4, Peter Lansberg1, Richard Sinke4, Jan Albert Kuivenhoven5. 1. Department of Pediatrics, Section Molecular Genetics, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, the Netherlands (J.-W.B., A.R., P.L., J.A.K.). 2. Department of Vascular Medicine, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, the Netherlands (J.-W.B.). 3. Department of Vascular Medicine, Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam, the Netherlands (X.Z.). 4. Department of Genetics, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, the Netherlands (M.V., R.K., F.v.D., R.S.). 5. Department of Pediatrics, Section Molecular Genetics, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, the Netherlands (J.-W.B., A.R., P.L., J.A.K.) j.a.kuivenhoven@umcg.nl.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Atherosclerosis starts in childhood but low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C), a causal risk factor, is mostly studied and dealt with when clinical events have occurred. Women are usually affected later in life than men and are underdiagnosed, undertreated, and understudied in cardiovascular trials and research. This study aims at a better understanding of lifestyle and genetic factors that affect LDL-C in young women. METHODS: We randomly selected for every year of age 8 women with LDL-C ≤1st percentile (≤50 mg/dL) and 8 women with LDL-C ≥99th percentile (≥186 mg/dL) from 28 000 female participants aged between 25 to 40 years of a population-based cohort study. The resulting groups include 119 and 121 women, respectively, of an average 33 years of age. A gene-sequencing panel was used to assess established monogenic and polygenic origins of these phenotypes. Information on lifestyle was extracted from questionnaires. A healthy lifestyle score was allocated based on a recently developed algorithm. RESULTS: Of the women with LDL-C ≤1st percentile, 19 (15.7%) carried mutations that are causing monogenic hypocholesterolemia and 60 (49.6%) were genetically predisposed to low LDL-C on the basis of an extremely low weighted genetic risk score. In comparison with control groups, a healthier lifestyle was not associated with low LDL-C in women without genetic predispositions. Among women with LDL-C ≥99th percentile, 20 women (16.8%) carried mutations that cause familial hypercholesterolemia, whereas 25 (21%) were predisposed to high LDL-C on the basis of a high-weighted genetic risk score. The women in whom no genetic origin for hypercholesterolemia could be identified were found to exhibit a significantly unfavorable lifestyle in comparison with controls. CONCLUSIONS: This study highlights the need for early assessment of the cardiovascular risk profile in apparently healthy young women to identify those with LDL-C ≥99th percentile for their age: first, because, in this study, 17% of the cases were molecularly diagnosed with familial hypercholesterolemia, which needs further attention; second, because our data indicate that an unfavorable lifestyle is significantly associated with severe hypercholesterolemia in genetically unaffected women, which may also need further attention.
RCT Entities:
BACKGROUND:Atherosclerosis starts in childhood but low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C), a causal risk factor, is mostly studied and dealt with when clinical events have occurred. Women are usually affected later in life than men and are underdiagnosed, undertreated, and understudied in cardiovascular trials and research. This study aims at a better understanding of lifestyle and genetic factors that affect LDL-C in young women. METHODS: We randomly selected for every year of age 8 women with LDL-C ≤1st percentile (≤50 mg/dL) and 8 women with LDL-C ≥99th percentile (≥186 mg/dL) from 28 000 female participants aged between 25 to 40 years of a population-based cohort study. The resulting groups include 119 and 121 women, respectively, of an average 33 years of age. A gene-sequencing panel was used to assess established monogenic and polygenic origins of these phenotypes. Information on lifestyle was extracted from questionnaires. A healthy lifestyle score was allocated based on a recently developed algorithm. RESULTS: Of the women with LDL-C ≤1st percentile, 19 (15.7%) carried mutations that are causing monogenic hypocholesterolemia and 60 (49.6%) were genetically predisposed to low LDL-C on the basis of an extremely low weighted genetic risk score. In comparison with control groups, a healthier lifestyle was not associated with low LDL-C in women without genetic predispositions. Among women with LDL-C ≥99th percentile, 20 women (16.8%) carried mutations that cause familial hypercholesterolemia, whereas 25 (21%) were predisposed to high LDL-C on the basis of a high-weighted genetic risk score. The women in whom no genetic origin for hypercholesterolemia could be identified were found to exhibit a significantly unfavorable lifestyle in comparison with controls. CONCLUSIONS: This study highlights the need for early assessment of the cardiovascular risk profile in apparently healthy young women to identify those with LDL-C ≥99th percentile for their age: first, because, in this study, 17% of the cases were molecularly diagnosed with familial hypercholesterolemia, which needs further attention; second, because our data indicate that an unfavorable lifestyle is significantly associated with severe hypercholesterolemia in genetically unaffected women, which may also need further attention.
Authors: Xiang Zhang; Antoine Rimbert; Willem Balder; Aeilko Having Zwinderman; Jan Albert Kuivenhoven; Geesje Margaretha Dallinga-Thie; Albert Kornelis Groen Journal: J Lipid Res Date: 2018-09-28 Impact factor: 5.922
Authors: Maria C Adank; Laura Benschop; Sophia P van Streun; Anna M Smak Gregoor; Monique T Mulder; Eric A P Steegers; Sarah Schalekamp-Timmermans; Jeanine E Roeters van Lennep Journal: BMC Med Date: 2020-12-23 Impact factor: 8.775
Authors: Seyedmohammad Saadatagah; Merin Jose; Ozan Dikilitas; Lubna Alhalabi; Alexandra A Miller; Xiao Fan; Janet E Olson; David C Kochan; Maya Safarova; Iftikhar J Kullo Journal: NPJ Genom Med Date: 2021-04-14 Impact factor: 8.617
Authors: Maria C Adank; Anja K Johansen; Laura Benschop; Sophia P Van Streun; Anna M Smak Gregoor; Linn K L Øyri; Monique T Mulder; Eric A P Steegers; Kirsten B Holven; Jeanine E Roeters van Lennep Journal: BMC Pregnancy Childbirth Date: 2022-07-23 Impact factor: 3.105
Authors: Wieneke Dijk; Mathilde Di Filippo; Cédric Le May; Philippe Moulin; Bertrand Cariou; Sander Kooijman; Robin van Eenige; Antoine Rimbert; Amandine Caillaud; Aurélie Thedrez; Lucie Arnaud; Amanda Pronk; Damien Garçon; Thibaud Sotin; Pierre Lindenbaum; Enrique Ozcariz Garcia; Jean-Paul Pais de Barros; Laurence Duvillard; Karim Si-Tayeb; Nuria Amigo; Jean-Yves Le Questel; Patrick C N Rensen Journal: Circulation Date: 2022-07-28 Impact factor: 39.918
Authors: Antoine Rimbert; Hinda Daggag; Peter Lansberg; Adam Buckley; Martijn Viel; Roan Kanninga; Lennart Johansson; Robin P F Dullaart; Richard Sinke; Alia Al Tikriti; Jan Albert Kuivenhoven; Maha Taysir Barakat Journal: Front Genet Date: 2022-01-03 Impact factor: 4.599