Literature DB >> 29459373

Neurobiological Mechanisms of Responding to Injustice.

Mirre Stallen1,2,3, Filippo Rossi4, Amber Heijne5, Ale Smidts2, Carsten K W De Dreu3,6, Alan G Sanfey5,7.   

Abstract

People are particularly sensitive to injustice. Accordingly, deeper knowledge regarding the processes that underlie the perception of injustice, and the subsequent decisions to either punish transgressors or compensate victims, is of important social value. By combining a novel decision-making paradigm with functional neuroimaging, we identified specific brain networks that are involved with both the perception of, and response to, social injustice, with reward-related regions preferentially involved in punishment compared with compensation. Developing a computational model of punishment allowed for disentangling the neural mechanisms and psychological motives underlying decisions of whether to punish and, subsequently, of how severely to punish. Results show that the neural mechanisms underlying punishment differ depending on whether one is directly affected by the injustice, or whether one is a third-party observer of a violation occurring to another. Specifically, the anterior insula was involved in decisions to punish following harm, whereas, in third-party scenarios, we found amygdala activity associated with punishment severity. Additionally, we used a pharmacological intervention using oxytocin, and found that oxytocin influenced participants' fairness expectations, and in particular enhanced the frequency of low punishments. Together, these results not only provide more insight into the fundamental brain mechanisms underlying punishment and compensation, but also illustrate the importance of taking an explorative, multimethod approach when unraveling the complex components of everyday decision-making.SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT The perception of injustice is a fundamental precursor to many disagreements, from small struggles at the dinner table to wasteful conflict between cultures and countries. Despite its clear importance, relatively little is known about how the brain processes these violations. Taking an interdisciplinary approach, we combine methods from neuroscience, psychology, and economics to explore the neurobiological mechanisms involved in both the perception of injustice as well as the punishment and compensation decisions that follow. Using a novel behavioral paradigm, we identified specific brain networks, developed a computational model of punishment, and found that administrating the neuropeptide oxytocin increases the administration of low punishments of norm violations in particular. Results provide valuable insights into the fundamental neurobiological mechanisms underlying social injustice.
Copyright © 2018 the authors 0270-6474/18/382944-11$15.00/0.

Entities:  

Keywords:  compensation; computational modeling; neuroimaging; oxytocin; punishment; social norms

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29459373      PMCID: PMC6596077          DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1242-17.2018

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurosci        ISSN: 0270-6474            Impact factor:   6.167


  19 in total

1.  An Eye for an Eye: Neural Correlates of the Preference for Punishment-Based Justice.

Authors:  Samantha J Fede; Joshua L Gowin; Peter Manza
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2018-08-29       Impact factor: 6.167

2.  Sentiment Analysis in Children with Neurodevelopmental Disorders in an Ingroup/Outgroup Setting.

Authors:  E Vaucheret Paz; M Martino; M Hyland; M Corletto; C Puga; M Peralta; N Deltetto; T Kuhlmann; D Cavalié; M Leist; B Duarte; I Lascombes
Journal:  J Autism Dev Disord       Date:  2020-01

3.  An fMRI investigation of the intention-outcome interactions in second- and third-party punishment.

Authors:  Chunliang Feng; Qun Yang; Lydia Azem; Konstantina M Atanasova; Ruolei Gu; Wenbo Luo; Morris Hoffman; Stefanie Lis; Frank Krueger
Journal:  Brain Imaging Behav       Date:  2021-09-17       Impact factor: 3.978

4.  Breakdown of utilitarian moral judgement after basolateral amygdala damage.

Authors:  Jack van Honk; David Terburg; Estrella R Montoya; Jordan Grafman; Dan J Stein; Barak Morgan
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2022-07-25       Impact factor: 12.779

5.  Oxytocin and the Punitive Hub-Dynamic Spread of Cooperation in Human Social Networks.

Authors:  Shiyi Li; Shuangmei Ma; Danyang Wang; Hejing Zhang; Yunzhu Li; Jiaxin Wang; Jingyi Li; Boyu Zhang; Jörg Gross; Carsten K W De Dreu; Wen-Xu Wang; Yina Ma
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2022-06-27       Impact factor: 6.709

Review 6.  Decision neuroscience and neuroeconomics: Recent progress and ongoing challenges.

Authors:  Jeffrey B Dennison; Daniel Sazhin; David V Smith
Journal:  Wiley Interdiscip Rev Cogn Sci       Date:  2022-02-08

7.  Intrinsic functional connectivity of the frontoparietal network predicts inter-individual differences in the propensity for costly third-party punishment.

Authors:  Qun Yang; Gabriele Bellucci; Morris Hoffman; Ko-Tsung Hsu; Bonian Lu; Gopikrishna Deshpande; Frank Krueger
Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci       Date:  2021-07-30       Impact factor: 3.282

8.  Me first: Neural representations of fairness during three-party interactions.

Authors:  Keith J Yoder; Jean Decety
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2020-08-03       Impact factor: 3.139

9.  Neural mechanisms of the mood effects on third-party responses to injustice after unfair experiences.

Authors:  Enhui Xie; Mengdie Liu; Jieqiong Liu; Xiaoxue Gao; Xianchun Li
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2022-04-15       Impact factor: 5.399

Review 10.  The emerging neuroscience of social punishment: Meta-analytic evidence.

Authors:  Gabriele Bellucci; Julia A Camilleri; Vijeth Iyengar; Simon B Eickhoff; Frank Krueger
Journal:  Neurosci Biobehav Rev       Date:  2020-04-14       Impact factor: 8.989

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.