Maria Nikodemova1, Jeremiah Yee2, Patrick R Carney2, Christopher A Bradfield2, Kristen Mc Malecki3. 1. Department of Population Health Sciences, School of Medicine and Public Health, University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI, United States. 2. The McArdle Laboratory for Cancer Research, Department of Oncology, School of Medicine and Public Health, University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI, United States. 3. Department of Population Health Sciences, School of Medicine and Public Health, University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI, United States; The McArdle Laboratory for Cancer Research, Department of Oncology, School of Medicine and Public Health, University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI, United States. Electronic address: kmalecki@wisc.edu.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Obesity has been shown to alter response to air pollution and smoking but underlying biological mechanisms are largely unknown and few studies have explored mechanisms by which obesity increases human sensitivity to environmental exposures. OBJECTIVE: Overall study goals were to investigate whole blood gene expression in smokers and non-smokers to examine associations between cigarette smoke and changes in gene expression by obesity status and test for effect modification. METHODS: Relative fold-change in mRNA expression levels of 84 genes were analyzed using a Toxicity and Stress PCR array among 50 21-54 year old adults. Data on smoking status was confirmed using urinary cotinine levels. Adjusted models included age, gender, white blood cell count and body-mass index. RESULTS: Models comparing gene expression of smokers vs. non-smokers identified six differentially expressed genes associated with smoking after adjustments for covariates. Obesity was associated with 29 genes differentially expressed compared to non-obese. We also identified 9 genes with significant smoking/obesity interactions influencing mRNA levels in adjusted models comparing expression between smokers vs non-smokers for four DNA damage related genes (GADD45A, DDB2, RAD51 and P53), two oxidative stress genes (FTH1, TXN), two hypoxia response genes (BN1P3lL, ARNT), and one gene associated with unfolded protein response (ATF6B). CONCLUSIONS: Findings suggest that obesity alters human sensitivity to smoke exposures through several biological pathways by modifying gene expression. Additional studies are needed to fully understand the clinical impact of these effects, but risk assessments should consider underlying phenotypes, such as obesity, that may modulate sensitivity of vulnerable populations to environmental exposures.
BACKGROUND:Obesity has been shown to alter response to air pollution and smoking but underlying biological mechanisms are largely unknown and few studies have explored mechanisms by which obesity increaseshuman sensitivity to environmental exposures. OBJECTIVE: Overall study goals were to investigate whole blood gene expression in smokers and non-smokers to examine associations between cigarette smoke and changes in gene expression by obesity status and test for effect modification. METHODS: Relative fold-change in mRNA expression levels of 84 genes were analyzed using a Toxicity and Stress PCR array among 50 21-54 year old adults. Data on smoking status was confirmed using urinary cotinine levels. Adjusted models included age, gender, white blood cell count and body-mass index. RESULTS: Models comparing gene expression of smokers vs. non-smokers identified six differentially expressed genes associated with smoking after adjustments for covariates. Obesity was associated with 29 genes differentially expressed compared to non-obese. We also identified 9 genes with significant smoking/obesity interactions influencing mRNA levels in adjusted models comparing expression between smokers vs non-smokers for four DNA damage related genes (GADD45A, DDB2, RAD51 and P53), two oxidative stress genes (FTH1, TXN), two hypoxia response genes (BN1P3lL, ARNT), and one gene associated with unfolded protein response (ATF6B). CONCLUSIONS: Findings suggest that obesity alters human sensitivity to smoke exposures through several biological pathways by modifying gene expression. Additional studies are needed to fully understand the clinical impact of these effects, but risk assessments should consider underlying phenotypes, such as obesity, that may modulate sensitivity of vulnerable populations to environmental exposures.
Authors: F Javier Nieto; Paul E Peppard; Corinne D Engelman; Jane A McElroy; Loren W Galvao; Elliot M Friedman; Andrew J Bersch; Kristen C Malecki Journal: BMC Public Health Date: 2010-12-23 Impact factor: 3.295
Authors: Benjamin T Suratt; Niki D J Ubags; Deepa Rastogi; Kelan G Tantisira; Benjamin J Marsland; Irina Petrache; Janice B Allen; Jason H T Bates; Fernando Holguin; Meredith C McCormack; Evangelos D Michelakis; Stephen M Black; Manu Jain; Ana L Mora; Viswanathan Natarajan; Yury I Miller; Michael B Fessler; Konstantin G Birukov; Ross S Summer; Stephanie A Shore; Anne E Dixon Journal: Ann Am Thorac Soc Date: 2017-06
Authors: Min Ji Kim; Véronique Pelloux; Erwan Guyot; Joan Tordjman; Linh-Chi Bui; Aline Chevallier; Claude Forest; Chantal Benelli; Karine Clément; Robert Barouki Journal: Environ Health Perspect Date: 2012-01-19 Impact factor: 9.031
Authors: Kristen M C Malecki; Maria Nikodemova; Amy A Schultz; Tamara J LeCaire; Andrew J Bersch; Lisa Cadmus-Bertram; Corinne D Engelman; Erika Hagen; Mari Palta; Ajay K Sethi; Matt C Walsh; F Javier Nieto; Paul E Peppard Journal: medRxiv Date: 2021-04-07
Authors: Kristen M C Malecki; Maria Nikodemova; Amy A Schultz; Tamara J LeCaire; Andrew J Bersch; Lisa Cadmus-Bertram; Corinne D Engelman; Erika Hagen; Laura McCulley; Mari Palta; Allison Rodriguez; Ajay K Sethi; Matt C Walsh; F Javier Nieto; Paul E Peppard Journal: Front Public Health Date: 2022-03-31