Seval Bayrak1, Sıddıka Halıcıoglu2, Gülcan Kose3, Koray Halıcıoglu3. 1. Abant Izzet Baysal University, Faculty of Dentistry, Department of Maxillofacial Radiology, Bolu, Turkey. Electronic address: sevalbayrak@ibu.edu.tr. 2. Abant Izzet Baysal University, Faculty of Medicine, Department of Radiology, Bolu, Turkey. 3. Abant Izzet Baysal University, Faculty of Dentistry, Department of Orthodontics, Bolu, Turkey.
Abstract
PURPOSE: The aim of the present study is to evaluate the relationship between mandibular condyle cortication and chronologic age and gender via cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) and to investigate the effectiveness of using the condylar cortication as a new method of age estimation. METHODS: CBCT images from 433 subjects aged 8 to 31 years were included in this study. The right and left condyle cortication were assessed on the sagittal plane separately for each individual by the same investigator via a new method that describes the cortication of the condyle. Type I: There is no cortication on the condyle. Type II: The bone that is on the superior surface of the condyle is seen less density than the structures around the condyle. Type III: The surface of the condyle is seen similar or higher density than the surrounding cortical areas. RESULTS: The type of the condyle cortication in the right and left mandible was similar for almost each subject and there was no statistically significant different between them (p = 0.375). When we evaluated the results without including these patients for male, Type I cortication of the condyle was seen at 14.14 ± 2.3 years, Type II cortication of the condyle was seen at 16.11 ± 3.18 years and Type III cortication of the condyle was seen at 19.39 ± 3.96 years. For the female, Type I cortication of the condyle was seen at 13.01 ± 2.16 years, Type II cortication of the condyle was seen at 15.52 ± 2.71 years and Type III cortication of the condyle was seen at 17.95 ± 3.13 years. The minimum age of Type III cortication was 11 and 15 years old for male and female, respectively. However, there are subjects, who are 30 year old man and 31 year old female, have no cortication as much as similar or higher than the surrounding the cortical areas. CONCLUSION: This study is the first investigation of the relationship between condyle cortication and chronologic age with CBCT in the Turkish population. The type of cortication in the right and left condyle may be different for the same individual. Chronologic age increased as the stages of the cortication process from Type I to Type III in male and female individuals, and all the stages of the cortication in the mandibular condyle of male occur later time according to female.
PURPOSE: The aim of the present study is to evaluate the relationship between mandibular condyle cortication and chronologic age and gender via cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) and to investigate the effectiveness of using the condylar cortication as a new method of age estimation. METHODS: CBCT images from 433 subjects aged 8 to 31 years were included in this study. The right and left condyle cortication were assessed on the sagittal plane separately for each individual by the same investigator via a new method that describes the cortication of the condyle. Type I: There is no cortication on the condyle. Type II: The bone that is on the superior surface of the condyle is seen less density than the structures around the condyle. Type III: The surface of the condyle is seen similar or higher density than the surrounding cortical areas. RESULTS: The type of the condyle cortication in the right and left mandible was similar for almost each subject and there was no statistically significant different between them (p = 0.375). When we evaluated the results without including these patients for male, Type I cortication of the condyle was seen at 14.14 ± 2.3 years, Type II cortication of the condyle was seen at 16.11 ± 3.18 years and Type III cortication of the condyle was seen at 19.39 ± 3.96 years. For the female, Type I cortication of the condyle was seen at 13.01 ± 2.16 years, Type II cortication of the condyle was seen at 15.52 ± 2.71 years and Type III cortication of the condyle was seen at 17.95 ± 3.13 years. The minimum age of Type III cortication was 11 and 15 years old for male and female, respectively. However, there are subjects, who are 30 year old man and 31 year old female, have no cortication as much as similar or higher than the surrounding the cortical areas. CONCLUSION: This study is the first investigation of the relationship between condyle cortication and chronologic age with CBCT in the Turkish population. The type of cortication in the right and left condyle may be different for the same individual. Chronologic age increased as the stages of the cortication process from Type I to Type III in male and female individuals, and all the stages of the cortication in the mandibular condyle of male occur later time according to female.