| Literature DB >> 29456276 |
Eun Young Ro1, Geun Su Kim1, Do Young Kwon1, Young Min Park1, Sang Woo Cho1, Sang Yun Lee1, Ik Hyun Yeo1, Ki Sun Yoon2.
Abstract
The objective of this study was to investigate the antimicrobial effects of cultured sugar/vinegar (CSV) blend and nisin to control the risk of Listeria monocytogenes in ready to cook (RTC) ravioli. Ravioli dough was prepared with 0.1, 0.3, 0.5, 1% CSV blend and 0.1, 0.2, and 0.3% nisin. Inoculated spinach or artichoke raviolis with 2.0 ± 0.5 log cfu/g of L. monocytogenes were packed aerobically or using modified atmosphere packaging (MAP), and then stored at 4, 10, 17, and 24 °C for 60 days. Growth kinetic parameters of the observed data fit well to the Baranyi equation. Ravioli with spinach filling materials yielded a higher risk than that with artichoke. L. monocytogenes was able to survive in ravioli with artichoke, but did not grow. The addition of 1% CSV blend or 0.3% nisin in spinach ravioli with the combination of MAP effectively controlled the growth of L. monocytogenes at the temperature below 10 °C. The organoleptic quality of spinach ravioli was not also affected by the application of 1% CSV blend. Therefore, the CSV blend can be recommended to improve the microbial safety and quality of natural RTC ravioli at retail market. Practical applications: The risk of ravioli was affected by the filling materials of ravioli at retail market. Addition of 1% cultured sugar/vinegar blend in dough substantially contributes to the extension of shelf-life of MAP spinach raviolis. classification and regression tree analysis results indicate that refrigeration temperature is the main control factor to affect lag time and growth rate, while packaging method is critical for maximum population density.Entities:
Year: 2017 PMID: 29456276 PMCID: PMC5811900 DOI: 10.1111/jfs.12392
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Food Saf ISSN: 0149-6085 Impact factor: 1.953
Comparison of the growth kinetics of L. monocytogenes according to the kind of ravioli, antimicrobial agent, and packaging
| Ravioli | Antimicrobial | Packaging | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Spinach | Artichoke | CSV | Nisin | MAP | Aerobic | |
| SGR | 0.568 ± 0.650 | 0.572 ± 0.836 | 0.949 ± 00.827 | 0.854 ± 00.834 | 0.582 ± 0.627 | 1.005 ± 0.845 |
| LT | 17.636 ± 18.459 | 8.779 ± 9.456 | 7.765 ± 11.084 | 7.458 ± 10.018 | 15.545 ± 15.766 | 2.510 ± 2.356 |
| MPD | 5.420 ± 1.893 | 4.569 ± 1.542 | 7.434 ± 01.603 | 6.819 ± 01.866 | 5.682 ± 1.832 | 7.507 ± 1.454 |
LT = lag time (day); SGR = specific growth rate (log/day); MPD = maximum population density (log cfu/g).
aModified packaged ravioli with CSV blend at 0, 0.1, 0.3, 0.5, and 1% was compared.
bCSV blend and nisin at 0.1 and 0.3% was compared in spinach ravioli.
cOnly spinach ravioli treated CSV blend was compared.
*Significant differences between the mean values of growth kinetics were determined by t test (p < .05).
Comparison of the growth kinetics of L. monocytogenes in CSV blend treated spinach ravioli with MAP
| Temperature (°C) | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Concentration of CSV (%) | 4 | 10 | 17 | 24 | |
| SGR | 0 | C0.15 ± 0.06a | C0.23 ± 0.08a | B1.08 ± 0.37a | A1.85 ± 0.19a |
| 0.1 | C0.09 ± 0.02ab | C0.14 ± 0.05ab | B0.94 ± 0.00a | A1.96 ± 0.06a | |
| 0.3 | C0.05 ± 0.00bc | C0.06 ± 0.00b | B0.65 ± 0.00ab | A1.64 ± 0.06a | |
| 0.5 | D0.02 ± 0.01bc | C0.06 ± 0.00b | B0.35 ± 0.01b | A0.73 ± 0.00b | |
| 1 | C0.01 ± 0.00c | C0.05 ± 0.00b | B0.27 ± 0.00b | A0.80 ± 0.01b | |
| LT | 0 | A25.89 ± 2.05b | B17.70 ± 0.00d | C1.23 ± 0.03c | C1.04 ± 0.69c |
| 0.1 | A26.30 ± 0.26b | B17.83 ± 0.02d | C1.75 ± 0.11c | D1.26 ± 0.01c | |
| 0.3 | A35.75 ± 0.02b | B25.86 ± 0.06c | C1.99 ± 0.01c | D1.20 ± 0.00c | |
| 0.5 | A56.30 ± 7.99a | B36.42 ± 0.07b | C5.16 ± 0.07b | D2.78 ± 0.01b | |
| 1 | NA | A50.21 ± 0.24a | B7.18 ± 0.00a | C6.28 ± 0.03a | |
| MPD | 0 | D4.73 ± 0.00a | C7.02 ± 0.05a | B7.85 ± 0.04a | A8.09 ± 0.00a |
| 0.1 | C5.14 ± 0.71a | B6.82 ± 0.00a | AB7.82 ± 0.08a | A8.24 ± 0.21a | |
| 0.3 | D3.35 ± 0.00b | C4.55 ± 0.00b | B4.86 ± 0.00b | A7.71 ± 0.07a | |
| 0.5 | D2.76 ± 0.04b | C3.70 ± 0.00c | B4.16 ± 0.00c | A5.75 ± 0.00b | |
| 1 | C2.47 ± 0.41b | C2.97 ± 0.00d | B4.18 ± 0.00c | A5.72 ± 0.00b | |
LT = lag time (day); SGR = specific growth rate (log/day); MPD = maximum population density (log cfu/g).
a∼c Means (n = 4) ± SD in the same column with different superscripts are significantly different by Duncan's multiple range test at p < .05.
A∼D Means (n = 4) ± SD in the same row with different superscripts are significantly different by Duncan's multiple range test at p < .05.
Response surface models for effect of temperature and CSV blend concentration (0–1%) on lag time (LT), specific growth rate (SGR), and maximum population density (MPD) of L. monocytogenes in spinach ravioli
| SGR | LT | MPD | ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Parameter | Estimate |
| Pr > | |
| Estimate |
| Pr > | |
| Estimate |
| Pr > | |
|
| Intercept | 0.0479 | 0.1189 | .6932 | .98 | 41.3454 | 5.3445 | <.0001 | .94 | 4.7068 | 0.6134 | <.0001 | .93 |
| temp | 0.0172 | 0.0174 | .3388 | −3.7115 | 0.8064 | .0005 | 0.2066 | 0.0897 | .0372 | |||
| anti | −0.7709 | 0.2969 | .0211 | 64.6007 | 13.6507 | .0004 | −8.5007 | 1.5319 | <.0001 | |||
| temp × temp | 0.0027 | 0.0006 | .0004 | 0.0852 | 0.0283 | .0100 | −0.0012 | 0.0031 | .6960 | |||
| anti × anti | 0.9708 | 0.2497 | .0016 | −2.3074 | 11.8314 | .8484 | 5.4556 | 1.2884 | .0008 | |||
| temp ×anti | −0.0652 | 0.0098 | <.0001 | −2.6137 | 0.5730 | .0005 | −0.0237 | 0.0504 | .6455 | |||
Figure 1Cart analysis result of (a) SGR, (b) LT, and (c) MPD. The number in the top node indicates parameter value with the corresponding sample number in parenthesis. By following the tree structure, partitions are generated with sequential criteria of the selected factors. The root nodes are shaded in grey with final predicted SGR values for the portioned samples