Ugo Marzocchi1,2,3, Bo Thamdrup1, Peter Stief1, Ronnie N Glud1,4. 1. Department of Biology and Nordic Center for Earth Evolution (NordCEE) University of Southern Denmark, Odense M Denmark. 2. Department of Analytical Environmental and Geo-Chemistry, Vrije Universiteit Brussel (VUB) Brussels Belgium. 3. Center for Geomicrobiology and Section for Microbiology, Aarhus University Aarhus Denmark. 4. Scottish Association for Marine Science, Oban United Kingdom.
Abstract
The marine sediment hosts a mosaic of microhabitats. Recently it has been demonstrated that the settlement of phycodetrital aggregates can induce local changes in the benthic O2 distribution due to confined enrichment of organic material and alteration of the diffusional transport. Here, we show how this microscale O2 shift substantially affects benthic nitrogen cycling. In sediment incubations, the settlement of diatom-aggregates markedly enhanced benthic O2 and NO3- consumption and stimulated NO2- and NH4+ production. Oxygen microprofiles revealed the rapid development of anoxic niches within and underneath the aggregates. During 120 h following the settling of the aggregates, denitrification of NO3- from the overlying water increased from 13.5 μmol m-2 h-1 to 24.3 μmol m-2 h-1, as quantified by 15N enrichment experiment. Simultaneously, N2 production from coupled nitrification-denitrification decreased from 33.4 μmol m-2 h-1 to 25.9 μmol m-2 h-1, probably due to temporary inhibition of the benthic nitrifying community. The two effects were of similar magnitude and left the total N2 production almost unaltered. At the aggregate surface, nitrification was, conversely, very efficient in oxidizing NH4+ liberated by mineralization of the aggregates. The produced NO3- was preferentially released into the overlying water and only a minor fraction contributed to denitrification activity. Overall, our data indicate that the abrupt change in O2 microdistribution caused by aggregates stimulates denitrification of NO3- from the overlying water, and loosens the coupling between benthic nitrification and denitrification both in time and space. The study contributes to expanding the conceptual and quantitative understanding of how nitrogen cycling is regulated in dynamic benthic environments.
The marine sediment hosts a mosaic of microhabitats. Recently it has been demonstrated that the settlement of phycodetrital aggregates can induce local changes in the benthic O2distribution due to confined enrichment of organic material and alteration of thediffusional transport. Here, we show how this microscale O2 shift substantially affects benthic nitrogen cycling. In sediment incubations, the settlement of diatom-aggregates markedly enhanced benthic O2 andNO3- consumption and stimulatedNO2- andNH4+ production. Oxygen microprofiles revealed the rapiddevelopment of anoxic niches within and underneath the aggregates. During 120 h following the settling of the aggregates, denitrification of NO3- from the overlying water increased from 13.5 μmol m-2 h-1 to 24.3 μmol m-2 h-1, as quantified by 15N enrichment experiment. Simultaneously, N2 production from coupled nitrification-denitrification decreased from 33.4 μmol m-2 h-1 to 25.9 μmol m-2 h-1, probably due to temporary inhibition of the benthic nitrifying community. The two effects were of similar magnitude and left the total N2 production almost unaltered. At the aggregate surface, nitrification was, conversely, very efficient in oxidizing NH4+ liberated by mineralization of the aggregates. The producedNO3- was preferentially released into the overlying water and only a minor fraction contributed to denitrification activity. Overall, our data indicate that the abrupt change in O2 microdistribution caused by aggregates stimulates denitrification of NO3- from the overlying water, and loosens the coupling between benthic nitrification anddenitrification both in time and space. The study contributes to expanding the conceptual and quantitative understanding of how nitrogen cycling is regulated in dynamic benthic environments.
The seafloor is of key importance for the removal of reactive nitrogen from the oceans (e.g., Seitzinger et al. 2006; Eugster and Gruber 2012). Here, the reduction of soluble inorganic nitrogen species (i.e.,
,
) to gaseous NO, N2O, andN2 by denitrification occurs in the anoxic zone underlying the oxic sediment layer that blankets the seafloor. Numerous investigations have documented that theO2distribution in thesediment exhibits high vertical and horizontal heterogeneity. Within the milli‐ to centimeter scale, O2 consumption rates can vary over an order of magnitude, generating a mosaic of oxic to hypoxic/anoxic niches (e.g., Rabouille et al. 2003; Glud et al. 2005, 2009). This small‐scale spatial (and temporal) heterogeneity has traditionally been linked to the activity of benthic fauna or to thedeposition of fecal pellets. Settling algae‐aggregates have only recently been proposed to induce temporary O2depleted areas on thesediment surface (Boetius et al. 2013; Glud et al. 2014), and thereby generate anoxic microsites suitable for denitrification (Lehto et al. 2014). To date, however, thedevelopment and the importance of these transient microniches for benthic nitrogen cycling have not been experimentally investigated.Sinking aggregates and fecal pellets represent a major pathway for transporting material from the surface to thedeep ocean and the underlying benthic environment. Aggregates are generated when cells and particles collide and adhere, and preferentially form in the photic zone in the wake of phytoplankton blooms (Thornton 2002), or by sea‐ice algae in the spring during intense ice melting periods (Glud et al. 2014). Phycodetrital aggregates are quickly colonized by prokaryotic organisms (Kiorboe et al. 2002) and, with a delay, also by eukaryotes (Ploug and Grossart 2000; Worner et al. 2000), which together constitute an aggregate‐associated food‐web ultimately based on aggregate biomass mineralization. Depending on size, ambient O2 levels, and temperature, sinking aggregates may develop an anoxic center due to the high inherent mineralization rates sustained by thedegradation of thelabile algal biomass (Ploug and Grossart 1999, 2000) and to O2diffusion limitation (Alldredge and Cohen 1987; Ploug et al. 1997). Such internal anoxia have been shown to stimulate dissimilatory reduction of
from the surrounding water, both in cyanobacterial anddiatom aggregates, leading primarily to the release of
,
, andN2 back into the surrounding water (Klawonn et al. 2015; Stief et al. 2016). Mineralization of algal biomass may also contribute to the net release of
from sinking aggregates (Klawonn et al. 2015; Ploug and Bergkvist 2015). Additionally, several diatom species have the ability to accumulate
intracellularly to sustain dissimilatory anaerobic metabolism (Lomas and Glibert 2000; Seitzinger et al. 2006; Kamp et al. 2011, 2013), this may further stimulate nitrogen reducing pathways in sinking aggregates (Kamp et al. 2016; Stief et al. 2016).It is to be expected that intensified aggregate‐associatednitrogen cycling will prevail after the settlement at the seafloor. To date, it remains elusive, however, whether and how benthic nitrogen cycling might be affected by the complex microscale interaction between aggregates andsediment (Lehto et al. 2014). To improve our quantitative and mechanistic understanding on the interplay between sediment and settled aggregates, we studied the microscale O2dynamics within and around freshly deposited phycodetrital aggregates, and how this affected benthic denitrification and the exchange of O2 anddissolvedinorganic nitrogen (DIN, i.e.,
,
, and
) for up to 7d in a flow‐through system. Moreover, the contribution of aggregate‐bound N to theDIN exchange, nitrification anddenitrification rates was quantified by selectively labeling the aggregate biomass with 15N isotopes.
Methods
Aggregate production and sediment sampling
For the production of phycodetrital aggregates, Skeletonema marinoi (CCMP1332, NCMA) was cultured using F/2 medium plus silicate (Guillard and Ryther 1962). Diatom‐aggregates were formed in 550 mL bottles filled with 50 mL of stationary‐phase S. marinoi culture and natural seawater (salinity 30‰). The bottles were rotated on a plankton wheel for 3–4 d (16°C, light:dark cycle 14:10 h) until aggregates (2–5 mm diameter) formed (Stief et al. 2016). At 2‐day intervals, one third of the seawater in each bottle was replaced with fresh seawater to maintain theO2 level at > 80% air‐saturation (AS) and avoid accumulation of waste products from the growing S. marinoi culture.Coastal sediment was collected north of Ven (Sweden) (55°58′334 N; 12°41′594 E) at 32 m depth (bottom water temp. 10°C, salinity 35‰) by repeated casts of an HAPS corer (Kanneworff and Nicolaisen 1972). Thesediment was then subsampled using cylindrical Plexiglas® core liners (i.d. × height 5 × 20 cm), and transported to the laboratory. Within a few hours, large macrofauna, exclusively represented by Ophiuroids, was removed using forceps and the cores were transferred into a tank with stirred artificial seawater (30‰; Seasalt, Tetra.
concentration approx. 5 μM) at 16°C, in thedark. Sediment cores exhibiting a relatively homogeneous O2 penetration depth (typically 4–5 mm) were selected for the experiments.
Aggregate and sediment characterization
For characterization, 3‐ to 5‐day‐old aggregates were extracted from the production bottles using a glass tube (i.d. 8 mm) connected to a syringe that allowed the retrieval of single aggregates with minimal disturbance. Aggregates were then transferred onto a Petri dish containing artificial seawater (30‰) to wash off the residual growth medium still present in the aggregate‐production bottles, and to photograph the aggregates. The three‐axis of the ellipsoidal aggregates were measured by processing the images with the freely available software ImageJ (http://imagej.nih.gov). Dry weight and organic matter content (OM) (measured as loss on ignition, LOI) were measured after drying a batch of 16 randomly selected aggregates at 65°C (for 24 h) and 520°C (for 5 h), respectively.The amount of particulate n class="Chemical">organic carbon (POC) delivered to thesediment as aggregate biomass was calculated by the volumetric LOI multiplied by the total volume of aggregates added on each experiment and corrected by 0.4 (fraction of C in a CH2O molecule as m.w.). Particulate organic nitrogen (PON) was calculated by the POC content (mol) and the C : N ratio of the aggregates.
To determine the content of intracellular nitrate (ICNO3) according to Kamp et al. (2016), aggregates were sized as described above and transferred into pre‐weighed centrifugation tubes containing 0.5 mL of seawater. The tubes were then re‐weighed, snap‐frozen using liquidnitrogen, and stored at −20°C. Samples were exposed to three freeze‐thaw cycles to promote cell‐lysis and vortexed for 20 s. An aliquot of the homogeneous solution was then measured for
using the V3+ chemoluminesence methoddescribed below. TheICNO3 pool was determined as thedifference between the amount of
in the sample and in a control with only seawater. As theICNO3determination requires a destructive procedure, the initial ICNO3 of the aggregates used for the incubations was calculated from the relation between the aggregate volume and the volumetric ICNO3 concentration determined on 25, randomly selected, aggregates from the aggregate‐production bottles. At the end of each flow‐through incubation, aggregates were carefully removed from thesediment, sized, and theICNO3 was determined as described above. ICNO3 loss throughout the incubation was obtained from thedifference between the final and the initial ICNO3 pool size.Sediment porosity (vol : vol) ann class="Chemical">d OM content (as LOI) was determined as above at a depth resolution of 5 mm.
Oxygen microprofiles
The influence of settleddiatom‐aggregates on the benthic O2 micro‐distribution was assessed by O2 microsensor profiles. Three aggregates were randomly extracted from the production bottles and positioned on intact sediment cores. Sediment and aggregates were kept in thedark in an aquarium with artificial seawater (30‰) at the experimental temperature of 16°C. Thewater was constantly flushed with a mixture of air andN2 to maintain theO2 concentration at 70% (AS), which is representative of prevailing bottom waterO2 level in temperate and tropical regions (i.e., 61% of seafloor area with O2 level between 55% and 85% AS, calculated from Schlitzer, R., Ocean Data View, http://odv.awi.de, 2016). To minimize the buildup of a thick diffusive boundary layer that would impose an O2 transport limitation at thesedimentwater interface (Rasmussen and Jorgensen 1992), thewater was kept mixed by rotating magnetic bars driven by an external motor (24 r.p.m.). Oxygen microprofiles were measureddaily through the center of the aggregates, and on two occasions (at 76 h and 168 h), a transect (1 mm interval) was measured across an aggregate. For comparison, a similar transect was measured on the bare sediment before positioning the aggregate. Microprofiles were measured with an O2 microsensor constructed and calibrated according to Revsbech (1989). The sensor cathode was polarized at +0.8 V, and the signal was read on a custom‐made picoammeter connected via a data acquisition system (AD216, Unisense, Denmark) to a computer. The sensor was mounted on a motor‐driven micromanipulator that allowed for profiling at 50 μm vertical steps. The sensor tip was manually positioned at thesediment/aggregate surface while observing it through a horizontal dissection microscope.Thesediment anoxic volume induced by the presence of the aggregates at 76 h of incubation was estimated as the sum of the volumes of truncated ellipsoidal cones spanning between thesediment surface and thedepth of O2 penetration before the addition of the aggregates (i.e., 4.8 mm). The proportions between the radii of the aggregates and the upper and lower cone surfaces, respectively, were approximated using Fig. 2d (76 h). Thus, the top surface area was set equal to the anoxic footprint of each aggregate on thesediment surface and calculated using the 30% of each aggregate radii length. The base was calculated using the 180% of each aggregate radii length. This calculation provides a maximum estimation as it assumes that all aggregates induce an anoxic cone.
Figure 2
(a, b) Oxygen microprofiles measured through the center of two different aggregates positioned on the sediment surface (aggregates and sediment were of the same type as the ones used for the flow‐through incubations). Black lines indicate microprofiles (mean ± SEM, n = 3) measured in the sediment before the addition of the aggregates (bare sediment). The zero value on the y‐axes indicates the sediment–water interface (the aggregate surface is at approx. −1.8 mm). (c) Oxygen microprofiles measured through the center of an aggregate positioned on a sediment with a shallower O2 penetration depth. (d) Variation of the O2 microdistribution at the sediment–water interface before and after (two time points) the settlement of the aggregate profiled in Fig. 2b. The 2D oxygen microdistribution in each picture has been reconstructed by the interpolation of vertical microprofiles (dotted lines) measured across the longer horizontal axis of the aggregate. Aggregate approximate position and shape is outlined by the white line. Zero on the y‐axes corresponds to the sediment surface. Numbers on isopleths indicate O2 concentration (μM).
Flow‐through incubation I – 15N‐labeled
in overlying water
In parallel to theO2 micro‐distribution measurements on single aggregates, the integrated effect of the settlement of 11 aggregates on: (1) benthic O2 consumption, (2) DIN exchange, (3) denitrification, and (4)
release was investigated on sediment cores incubated in a flow‐through system (Fig. 1). This enabled15N enrichment experiments while maintaining constant O2 level in the overlying water over periods of days or weeks.
Figure 1
Panel A: The flow‐through system used for aggregate incubations. A: gas mixer; B: seawater reservoir; C: peristaltic pumps; D: optic oxygen reader; E: optode spots; F: thermometer; G: treatment chamber with sediment and aggregates; H: control chamber with sediment only; I: three‐way valve for inlet sampling; L: passive trap for outlet sampling; M: stirring bar. Top picture: Incubation chamber with aggregates settled on the sediment surface (chamber shaft external diameter: 5.8 cm). Bottom picture: Oxygen microprofile measurement through an aggregate (4.5 mm wide) on the sediment surface. Panel B: Diagram of the experimental design. Measurements of O2 and N dynamics were taken in the treatment and control chambers before (Pre‐incubation) and after (Incubation) 11 aggregates were added to the treatment chamber. The brown color indicates that only sediment was present in the chambers; green indicates the presence of aggregates onto the sediment. The arrow indicate the time of aggregates addition. The period named “stimulation” indicates the time interval when the addition of the aggregates substantially altered the benthic O2 and N dynamics (see text).
Panel A: The flow‐through system used for aggregate incubations. A: gas mixer; B: seawater reservoir; C: peristaltic pumps; D: optic oxygen reader; E: optode spots; F: thermometer; G: treatment chamber with sediment and aggregates; H: control chamber with sediment only; I: three‐way valve for inlet sampling; L: passive trap for outlet sampling; M: stirring bar. Top picture: Incubation chamber with aggregates settled on thesediment surface (chamber shaft external diameter: 5.8 cm). Bottom picture: Oxygen microprofile measurement through an aggregate (4.5 mm wide) on thesediment surface. Panel B: Diagram of the experimental design. Measurements of O2 and N dynamics were taken in the treatment and control chambers before (Pre‐incubation) and after (Incubation) 11 aggregates were added to the treatment chamber. The brown color indicates that only sediment was present in the chambers; green indicates the presence of aggregates onto thesediment. The arrow indicate the time of aggregates addition. The period named “stimulation” indicates the time interval when the addition of the aggregates substantially altered the benthic O2 and N dynamics (see text).Two sediment cores were placed into cylindrical glass chambers (i.d. × height 5.4 × 16 cm). Thesediment surface was positioned at about 3.5 cm below the upper rim. The top of each chamber was then sealed with a gas‐tight glass lid, thereby enclosing a water volume of ca. 60 mL above thesediment without leaving a headspace. Two openings situateddiametrically at 1 cm below the upper rim allowed to connect thewater‐filled compartment of each chamber, in parallel, to the flow‐through system. Artificial seawater, amended with 30 μM 15
(98 atom% 15N; Sigma‐Aldrich) and with a background concentration of 5 μM
, was fed from a reservoir (10 L) through the incubation chambers at constant rates of 0.14–0.18 mL min−1 in chamber 1 and 2, respectively with peristaltic pumps (Ole Dich, Denmark). At these rates, the average retention time of water within the chambers amounted to 5–7 h. Suspended magnetic stirring bars driven by an external motor (24 r.p.m.) ensured homogeneous water mixing inside the chambers. TheO2 level in both chambers was maintained at 70% AS by flushing the reservoir with a mixture of air (90%) andO2 (10%). Oxygen levels in the reservoir and inside each chamber were constantly monitored by fiber‐optic O2 sensors connected to an O2‐reader (PyroScience, Germany). All sediment incubations were performed in darkness at 16°C.After an acclimation period of 7 d with continuous flow‐through, monitoring of the concentration and isotopic composition of
,
,
, andN2 began by sampling water at the inlet and outlet of each chamber (once or twice per day) during the following 8 d (“pre‐incubation”). The pre‐incubation period served the twofold purpose of: (1) measuring reference O2 andDIN fluxes to assess the later variation induced by the aggregates; and (2) allowing the establishment of steady‐state 15 and 14‐DIN gradients in thesediment after the15N enrichment of the overlying water
pool. Water samples were withdrawn from sampling ports positioned at the inlet (three‐way valve) and outlet (passive trap) of each chamber (Fig. 1). Exetainers (5.9 mL) were filled for dissolvedN2 analysis and fixed with 100 μL ZnCl2 (50 : 50 vol : vol). Two‐milliliter tubes were filled for
,
, and
analysis and immediately frozen at −20°C. At the end of the “pre‐incubation” period, one chamber was opened, 11 aggregates were extracted from the aggregate‐production bottles (as described above), and carefully placed onto thesediment surface (density: 1 aggregate × 2 cm−2, total aggregates volume: 241 mm3). The chamber was then re‐sealed and the flow‐through incubation was resumed. Water sampling started 5 h after the chamber was sealed and continued in both chambers over the following 7 d (174 h).
Flow‐through incubation II – 15N‐labeled aggregates
In a separate experiment, we aimed to study the contribution of the aggregates' biomass‐bound N to benthic N cycling. 15N‐labeleddiatoms for aggregate production were thus grown for 3–4 weeks in modified F/2 medium where the original nitrogen source was replaced with a solution of Na14NO3 andNa15NO3 (98 atom% 15N; Sigma‐Aldrich) (30 : 70 w : w). After a sediment pre‐incubation of 5 d in a flow‐through system with seawater amended with 35 μM of unlabeled 14
, the15N‐labeled aggregates were added to one of the two sediment cores at the same density as in the previous experiment. The chamber was then re‐sealed and thewater flow resumed. The total incubation time was 17 d (380 h), with samplings once or twice per day as described above.
Rate calculation
Oxygen, n class="Chemical">N2, andDIN net fluxes between thesediment compartment (sediment or sediment + aggregates) and the overlying water were calculated as:
where
is the net flux,
and
are the concentrations in thewater at the outlet and inlet of the chamber, respectively;
is thewater flow rate, and
is the surface area of thesediment core.
Average fluxes (
) during tn class="Chemical">he pre‐incubation and incubation periods were calculated from a finite‐interval approximation of the integral of the fluxes measured over the respective time periods:
where
and
indicate the end and the start time of each period.
Gross
fluxes from the benthic compartment to the overlying water (release) was calculated by the changes in concentration and isotopic composition of the
pool between the inlet and outlet of each chamber according to Nishio et al. (1983):
where C
i is the concentration of
at the inlet; atom%out and atom%in are the15N atom percent of
(i.e., 15
: total
x 100) at the outlet and inlet, respectively; and 0.366 is the natural abundance of 15N in air (in %). The gross
flux from the overlying water to the benthic compartment (uptake) was calculated as thedifference between the gross
release and the net
flux.Denitrification rates of unlabeled (D
14) and15N‐labeled
(D
15) were calculated from the measured 29N2 and 30N2 production rates assuming random isotope pairing in the absence of anammox according to Nielsen (1992). Total denitrification rate (D
tot) was calculated as the sum of D
14 andD
15. Denitrification sustained by
from thewater (D
w) was calculated as:Denitrification couplen class="Chemical">d to nitrification (Dn) was calculated as thedifference between D
tot andD
w.
Anammox was quantified on the top 2 cm of sediment via anoxic slurries (2 mL sediment + 8 mL seawater + 2 mL He‐headspace in Exetainers), after amended with 15
and 14
at 100 μM. Anammox was determined based on the production of 29N2 and 30N2divided by the measured fraction of 15N in the
pool. Dinitrogen production via anammox was ratioed to theN2 production from denitrification determined in parallel incubations with 14
and 15
. Anammox contributed to the 4% of the total N2 production and thus was considered negligible for theIPT calculations.The isotope ratio of 15N‐labeled biomass of the aggregates (
= 15N : 14N) was calculated as:
where
is the isotopic composition of the aggregates biomass with respect to N and
(as a fraction of 1) is the natural abundance of 15N in air. Release rates of DIN species from aggregate biomass were estimated from net fluxes of 15N‐labeledDIN species calculated according to Eq. (1). However, as the final 15N‐labeling percentage of the aggregate biomass was only 60%, the total release of DIN species from aggregate biomass was correcteddividing the flux of 15N‐labeledDIN by 0.6.
Chemical analysis
Nitrate andnitrite concentrations were determined on a chemiluminescence detector (CLD 66s, Eco Physics) after being reduced to NO by the VCl3 (Braman andHendrix 1989) and NaI (Yang et al. 1997), respectively. Ammonium concentration was measured with thesalicylate method (Bower and HolmHansen 1980). The15N‐labeledN2 was analyzed in theheadspace of 5.9 mL Exetainers (Labco, UK) on a gas chromatography‐isotopic ratio mass spectrometer (GC‐IRMS; Thermo Delta V Plus, Thermo Scientific) (Dalsgaard et al. 2012) with the excess above natural abundance calculated according to Nielsen (1992). 15N‐labeled
,
, and
were analyzed after being converted to N2 via thecadmium/sulfamic acid, sulfamic acid, and hypobromite assay, respectively (Warembourg 1993; McIlvin and Altabet 2005; Fussel et al. 2012). The resulting 15N‐N2 was analyzed on the GC‐IRMS.Nitrogen isotopic composition (δ15N) and C : N ratio (mol : mol) of the aggregate biomass used for flow‐through incubation II (i.e., labeled‐aggregates experiment) were determined at the start of the incubation period. To remove 14N and15Ndissolved in the seawater that would otherwise mask the true δ15N of the biomass, aggregates were washed as follows: approximately 0.5 mL of aggregates (n = 20–30) were collected from the aggregate‐production bottles and transferred into 15 mL centrifuge tubes filled with 5 mL of NaCl solution (30‰). The tubes were then shaken to resuspend the biomass and gently centrifuged (3000 rpm, 5 min). The supernatant was successively removed and replaced with new NaCl solution. This washing procedure was repeated three times. Samples were then frozen for later analysis. Prior to analysis, samples were thawed and mixed. Small aliquots (150 μL) of dense biomass solution were let dry in aluminum capsules and analyzed on an elemental analyzer coupled to an isotope ratio mass spectrometer (EA‐IRMS, Thermo Delta V, Thermo Scientific).
Statistical analysis
The impact of the settlement of aggregates on the benthic processes (fluxes) was assessed by calculating thedifference between the fluxes measured in the treatment chamber and control chamber at each time point. A significant change of this difference from the pre‐incubation to the stimulation phase was used as evidence of the impact of the aggregates (Underwood 1993). Thedifference between the two series was assessed by a t‐test assuming unequal variance.
Results
Thesediment showed a distinct lamination with a top brown/orange layer, an intermediate gray horizon and a deeper (> 1 cm) black layer (Fig. 1). In the top 2 cm, sediment porosity ranged between 0.73 and 0.66, whereas the organic content (LOI) ranged between 2.1% and 3.1% of dry weight (Table 1). Both parameters showed no distinct vertical gradient. The applied aggregates appeared ellipsoidal, compact, and exhibited the golden‐brown color (Fig. 1) characteristic of the photopigment fucoxanthin abundantly found in diatoms. The average diameter and volume of the aggregates was 2.3 mm (1.2 SD) and 6.9 mm2 (9.4), respectively. Organic content (LOI) accounted for the 48% of thedry weight (Table 1). The total amount of particulate organic carbon POC andPONdelivered to thesediment as aggregate deposition was 6.2 mg and 0.8 mg, respectively.
Table 1
Characteristics of sediment and fresh aggregates (3‐ to 5‐day‐old) used in the experiments. Values are reported as Mean (Standard deviation, number of samples). Asterisks (*) indicate that the number refers to the amount of aggregates pooled to run the analysis, and it cannot therefore be interpreted as number of replicates.
Sediment
Depth interval (mm)
Porosity (v/v)
LOI (dry weight %)
0–5
0.73 (0.005, n = 3)
3.1 (0.074, n = 3)
5–10
0.66 (0.005, n = 3)
2.1 (0.003, n = 3)
10–20
0.70 (0.002, n = 3)
2.9 (0.084, n = 3)
O2 pen. depth (mm)
4.8 (0.17, n = 3)
O2 cons. rate (mmol m−2 h−1)
0.92
Aggregates
Max diam. (mm)
3.0 (1.10, n = 67)
Min diam. (mm)
1.3 (0.44, n = 67)
Surface area (cm2)
0.18 (0.14, n = 67)
Volume (mm3)
6.9 (9.4, n = 67)
Dry weight (mg mm−3)
0.224 (n = 30*)
LOI (dry weight %)
48 (n =30*)
C : N
8.7
ICNO3− (nmol mm−3)
0.93 (0.35, n = 12)
Characteristics of sediment and fresh aggregates (3‐ to 5‐day‐old) used in the experiments. Values are reported as Mean (Standarddeviation, number of samples). Asterisks (*) indicate that the number refers to the amount of aggregates pooled to run the analysis, and it cannot therefore be interpreted as number of replicates.
Oxygen micro‐distribution and dynamics on single aggregates
Before the addition of the aggregates, O2 penetrated on average 4.8 mm into thesediment (O2 conc. < 1 μM) (Table 1; Fig. 2a,b). The positioning of diatom‐aggregates onto thesediment surface remarkably modified the benthic O2distribution. Shortly after their settlement, anoxia was detected in the aggregates core (e.g., Fig. 2a,b). The onset of anoxic conditions in the aggregate core varied between 0 and 75 h across all investigated aggregates (six). The anoxic zone of thesediment rose below the aggregates and, in some cases, temporarily merged with the anoxic core of the aggregate (e.g., Fig. 2b). Anoxic conditions were detected either inside or immediately below the aggregate for at least 53 h before theO2distribution gradually reverted. Similar dynamics were observed with the same type of aggregates produced on different occasions and placed onto sediment with a shallower O2 penetration depth (e.g., Fig. 2c).(a, b) Oxygen microprofiles measuren class="Chemical">d through the center of two different aggregates positioned on thesediment surface (aggregates andsediment were of the same type as the ones used for the flow‐through incubations). Black lines indicate microprofiles (mean ± SEM, n = 3) measured in thesediment before the addition of the aggregates (bare sediment). The zero value on the y‐axes indicates thesediment–water interface (the aggregate surface is at approx. −1.8 mm). (c) Oxygen microprofiles measured through the center of an aggregate positioned on a sediment with a shallower O2 penetration depth. (d) Variation of theO2 microdistribution at thesediment–water interface before and after (two time points) the settlement of the aggregate profiled in Fig. 2b. The 2Doxygen microdistribution in each picture has been reconstructed by the interpolation of vertical microprofiles (dotted lines) measured across the longer horizontal axis of the aggregate. Aggregate approximate position and shape is outlined by the white line. Zero on the y‐axes corresponds to thesediment surface. Numbers on isopleths indicate O2 concentration (μM).
The reconstructed 2DO2distribution from three transect measurements showed a relatively regular O2 layering before the aggregate settlement (Fig. 2d, Day 0). On day four (Fig. 2d, 76 h), the anoxic zone of thesediment was lifted below the settled aggregate (same specimen analyzed in Fig. 2b). The influence of the aggregate extended beyond the area immediately underneath the aggregate. At 3 mm and 4 mm distance from the aggregate center (coordinate 0 and 1 on the x‐axes), thesediment anoxic horizon was lifted 0.3 mm and 0.2 mm, respectively, as compared to the pre‐aggregate conditions (i.e., Fig. 2d, Day 0). According to the microprofiles reported in Fig. 2b, the period of maximum expansion of the anoxic zone (30 h) and thedevelopment of a separate anoxic microniche (99 h) was missed by this procedure. After 8 d, O2 penetrateddeeper into the aggregate (Fig. 2c, 168 h), and the anoxic area of thesediment had retreated. However, the zone of O2depletion remained substantially expanded as compared to the pre‐aggregate conditions. For instance, theO2 concentration at thedepth of 1.5 mm below the aggregate center (coordinates y = 0, x = 4), was only 33 μM as compared to 87 μM prior to aggregate settlement.
Flow‐through incubation I: 15N‐labeled water
Oxygen and DIN sediment‐water exchange
Figure 3 shows net fluxes of O2,
,
, and
across thesediment‐water interface (SWI) in the aggregate and control chambers over a 300‐h period. As the fluxes were calculated from thedifference in concentration at the outlet and inlet of the chambers, they represent the integrated effect of 11 aggregates on the benthic N transformations andO2 consumption. The addition of aggregates resulted in an instantaneous increase by 42% of the benthic O2 uptake. During the 119 h following the aggregates addition (hereafter named “stimulation period”), O2 uptake decreased gradually to finally re‐align with pre‐aggregate conditions after 124 h (< 8% change). During the stimulation period, the increaseddifference between the treatment and control chambers, as compared to the pre‐incubation, indicated a significant effect of the addition of aggregates on the benthic O2 consumption (p < 0.01).
Figure 3
Time series of O2 and
(a), and
and
(b) net fluxes across the sediment–water interface, in the aggregate (full symbols) and control (empty symbols) chambers. The zero on the x‐axes indicates the time when aggregates were placed onto the sediment surface. The two dotted lines remark the start and the end of the 119 h period of enhanced O2 consumption (stimulation period).
Time series of O2 ann class="Chemical">d
(a), and
and
(b) net fluxes across thesediment–water interface, in the aggregate (full symbols) and control (empty symbols) chambers. The zero on the x‐axes indicates the time when aggregates were placed onto thesediment surface. The two dotted lines remark the start and the end of the 119 h period of enhancedO2 consumption (stimulation period).
Over the stimulation perion class="Chemical">d, the average O2 consumption in the aggregates chamber increased from 0.92 mmol m−2 h−1 to 1.1 mmol m−2 h−1, resulting in a net additional consumption of 43.7 μmoles of O2. Assuming a respiratory quotient (oxygen : carbon) of 1, such increase in O2 consumption would have corresponded to the mineralization of 8% of the total aggregate‐associated POC.
In the flow‐through chamber, tn class="Chemical">he aggregates covered 1.7 cm2 of sediment (equal to 8.7% of the total sediment surface). The estimated volume of the anoxic cones projected from the base of each aggregate (considering an expansion of the anoxic zone similar to the one measured at 76 h) was 1.1 cm3, which corresponds to approximately 11% of the initial oxic volume of thesediment core.
Following the addition of aggregates, thesediment transiently turned into a net source of
. However, after 47 h, the flux returned to negative values, indicating net uptake (Fig. 3a). On average,
net uptake in the aggregate chamber decreased from 4.0 μmol m−2 h−1 during the pre‐incubation period to 2.4 μmol m−2 h−1 during the stimulation period. The analysis of thedifference between the two chambers revealed a significant effect of the aggregates during the stimulation period (p = 0.04). Net 15
production was measured throughout the experiment, indicating ongoing DNRA activity. During the stimulation period, the net production of 15
decreased from 3.2 (pre‐incubation) to 2.1 μmol m−2 h−1 (data not shown).The average
production increased from zero to 1.1 μmol m−2 h−1 during the first 69 h of incubation, before conditions reverted to no net exchange (Fig. 3b). At 5, 45, and 53 h, 15
accounted for 71%, 59%, and 82% of the total net
production, respectively, indicating reduction of
from the overlying water as the main source of
. No significant changes (< 0.04 μmol m−2 h−1) in the average
fluxes were measured in the control chamber.Within the stimulation period, net
uptake peaked in two main events (21 and 98 h) (Fig. 3b). The average net
uptake increased from 26.9 (pre‐incubation) to 30.5 μmol m−2 h−1. During the same period, the average
uptake in the control chamber varied from 25.7 μmol m−2 h−1 to 21.3 μmol m−2 h−1, but without any clear temporal trend. For the whole 119 h stimulation period, thedifference between the two chambers was not significant (p = 0.09), whereas it was significant for the first 98 h (p = 0.04). During the stimulation period, the
pool in the aggregate chamber became depleted in 15N, i.e., the15N atom fraction of
decreased from 0.87 ± 0.04 (Mean ± SD, n = 5) during the pre‐incubation to 0.77 ± 0.07 (n = 10) during the incubation period. Conversely, the value remained constant in the control chamber, i.e., 0.85 ± 0.03 (n = 5) and 0.85 ± 0.09 (n = 13) during the pre‐incubation and incubation, respectively. Thedecrease in thedifference between the15N atom fraction in the control and aggregate chamber after the addition of the aggregates was significant (p = 0.03).Estimation of the gross
fluxes indicated that both gross
uptake and release were stimulated by the addition of aggregates. Within the stimulation period, the gross
uptake increased from −37.4 μmol m−2 h−1 to −49.4 μmol m−2 h−1 (Fig. 6), whereas the gross
release increased from 10.5 μmol m−2 h−1 to 18.9 μmol m−2 h−1. TheICNO3 pool estimated at the incubation start and end was 184 nmol and 9.3 nmol, respectively.
Figure 6
Fluxes across the sediment–water and aggregate–water interfaces of DIN species during the pre‐incubation (sediment only) and stimulation periods (sediment + aggregates). Gray and beige areas represent anoxic and oxic zones of the sediment, respectively. Yellow circles symbolize diatoms cells. Fluxes are reported as averages over 75 h for the pre‐incubation period and 119 h for the stimulation period. All values are in μmol N m−2 h−1. Fluxes representative of the total exchange between water and sediment + aggregates were calculate from experiment 1. Fluxes of D
w and D
n were estimated via the Isotope Pairing Technique;
fluxes indicate gross fluxes calculated via Eq. 3, and
fluxes indicate net fluxes calculated via Eq. 2. For the stimulation period, the contribution of mineralized aggregates biomass to the
,
, and N2 fluxes (as estimated from experiment II with labeled aggregates) is indicated by white arrows. To avoid double counting, the mere contribution of the sediment has been calculated by subtracting
,
, and N2 fluxes from the aggregates biomass from the gross
release (18.9), net
uptake (–2.4), and D
n (26.0), respectively, as calculated from experiment I (see “Result” section).
The release of intracellularly storen class="Chemical">d
by diatoms throughout the incubation (174 h), was thus 175 nmol, corresponding to an average flux of 0.7 μmol
m−2 h−1 during the stimulation period (Fig. 6).
Dynamics of total denitrification and of its components D
w and D
n
Control and aggregates chambers showed constant 29N2 and 30N2 fluxes during the pre‐incubation indicating steady‐state conditions (Fig. 4a). Thedifferences between the two chambers denoted a natural heterogeneity between the intact sediment cores. The addition of the aggregates stimulated both fluxes. On average, during the stimulation period, 29N2 and 30N2 fluxes increased by the 36% and 211%, respectively. The increase was largely reabsorbed after the stimulation period, when on average, 29N2 and 30N2 fluxes remained only 15% and 96% higher as compared to the pre‐incubation level, respectively.
Figure 4
Time series of: (a) 29N2 and 30N2 production rates; (b) denitrification sustained by
from the water column (D
w); (c) denitrification sustained by
from nitrification (D
n); and (d) total denitrification rate (D
tot). Full and empty circles indicate rates measured in the aggregate and control chambers, respectively. The zero on the x‐axes indicates the time when aggregates were placed onto the sediment surface. The two dotted lines remark the start and the end of the 119 h period of enhanced O2 consumption (stimulation period).
Time series of: (a) 29N2 and 30N2 production rates; (b) denitrification sustained by
from thewater column (D
w); (c) denitrification sustained by
from nitrification (Dn); and (d) total denitrification rate (D
tot). Full and empty circles indicate rates measured in the aggregate and control chambers, respectively. The zero on the x‐axes indicates the time when aggregates were placed onto thesediment surface. The two dotted lines remark the start and the end of the 119 h period of enhancedO2 consumption (stimulation period).In accordance with the observed increase in gross
uptake, the addition of aggregates stimulateddenitrification fueled by
from the overlying water (D
w) (Fig. 4b). The increase in D
w in the aggregates chamber as compared to the control chamber was significant (p < 0.01). The average D
w within the stimulation period was 80% higher (+10.8 μmol m−2 h−1) than during the pre‐incubation (13.5 μmol N m−2 h−1) (Fig. 6). Between 119 and 174 h, the average D
w decreased to 17.5 μmol N m−2 h−1, thus still remaining 29% higher than during the pre‐incubation period. In contrast, the fraction of denitrification fueled by nitrification (Dn) decreased from the average pre‐incubation level of 33.4 to 22.8 μmol N m−2 h−1 at 21 h (Fig. 4c). Later measurements (21–174 h) indicate a slow but significant increase in the rate of Dn with time (Dn = 22.7 + 0.024 × hour; t(11) = 2.76, p = 0.02). At the end of the incubation (174 h), Dn was still 24% lower than during the pre‐incubation period (25.3 μmol N m−2 h−1). The average Dn within the stimulation period was 26.0 μmol N m−2 h−1 (Fig. 6). Thedrop of Dn in the aggregates chamber as compared to the control chamber during the stimulation period was significant (p < 0.01).The opposing effects onD
w andDn resulted in a non‐significant (p = 0.40) change in the total denitrification rate (D
tot) during the stimulation period (Fig. 4d). Within the first 76 h, thedifference in D
tot between aggregate and control chamber (11.1 ± 0.5 μmol N m−2 h−1, M ± SD, n = 8) did not change as compared to the one recordedduring the pre‐incubation (11.3 ± 1.2 μmol N m−2 h−1, n = 4). At 98 h, however, thedifference transiently increased to 20.8 μmol N m−2 h−1 (+83%). Later measurements realigned to the pre‐incubation level. In the aggregate chamber, the average D
tot in the pre‐incubation and stimulation period was 47.1 μmol N m−2 h−1 and 50.3 μmol N m−2 h−1, respectively (Fig. 6). No major variation in D
tot, D
w, andDn were recorded in the control chamber between the pre‐incubation and the incubation period.
To evaluate the importance of aggregate‐associated N for the overall benthic N cycling upon aggregate settlement, 15N‐labeled aggregates were added to thesediment in the flow‐through chamber in a separate experiment. Here, labeledDIN was released into the overlying water following the addition of aggregates onto thesediment surface (Fig. 5). The efflux of 15N‐labeledN2,
, and
began after 74 h, and coincided with the onset of anoxia at the core of the aggregate. 15N fluxes peaked at approx. 200 h, and then gradually decreased until the end of the incubation. By the last sampling time point (383 h), the fluxes of N2,
, and
haddecreased to 60%, 46%, and 20% of their maximum increases, respectively.
Figure 5
Net
,
, and N‐N2 release rates from aggregate biomass‐bound nitrogen throughout the pre‐incubation and incubation period in the aggregate chamber. Nitrate,
, and N‐N2 release rates were calculated from 15
, 15
, and 29N2 rates, respectively, corrected for the labeling fraction of the aggregate biomass (≈ 60%). Empty circles indicate O2 concentration measured at the center of an aggregate (via O2 microsensor) in a parallel incubation.
Net
,
, and N‐n class="Chemical">N2 release rates from aggregate biomass‐boundnitrogen throughout the pre‐incubation and incubation period in the aggregate chamber. Nitrate,
, and N‐N2 release rates were calculated from 15
, 15
, and 29N2 rates, respectively, corrected for the labeling fraction of the aggregate biomass (≈ 60%). Empty circles indicate O2 concentration measured at the center of an aggregate (via O2 microsensor) in a parallel incubation.
Between 74 and 383 h, the average fluxes of N2‐N,
, andderived from mineralization of aggregate biomass corresponded to 0.2 μmol N m−2 h−1, 1.2 μmol N m−2 h−1, and 10.1 μmol N m−2 h−1, respectively (Fig. 6). Within the same time‐interval, such fluxes released 0.16 μmol, 0.84 μmol, and 7.1 μmol of N2‐N,
, and
, respectively. The release of ICNO3 only accounted for 1.5% of the net
release into the overlying water. The sum of the inorganic N emission accounted for the mineralization of the 13.7% of the aggregates' biomass‐bound N pool. No net release of 15N‐labeledinorganic nitrogen species nor significant increase in theO2 consumption rate were measured in the control incubation (data not shown).Fluxes across thesediment–water and aggregate–water interfaces of DIN species during the pre‐incubation (sediment only) and stimulation periods (sediment + aggregates). Gray and beige areas represent anoxic and oxic zones of thesediment, respectively. Yellow circles symbolize diatoms cells. Fluxes are reported as averages over 75 h for the pre‐incubation period and 119 h for the stimulation period. All values are in μmol N m−2 h−1. Fluxes representative of the total exchange between water andsediment + aggregates were calculate from experiment 1. Fluxes of D
w andDn were estimated via the Isotope Pairing Technique;
fluxes indicate gross fluxes calculated via Eq. 3, and
fluxes indicate net fluxes calculated via Eq. 2. For the stimulation period, the contribution of mineralized aggregates biomass to the
,
, andN2 fluxes (as estimated from experiment II with labeled aggregates) is indicated by white arrows. To avoiddouble counting, the mere contribution of thesediment has been calculated by subtracting
,
, andN2 fluxes from the aggregates biomass from the gross
release (18.9), net
uptake (–2.4), andDn (26.0), respectively, as calculated from experiment I (see “Result” section).
Discussion
Aggregate effect on benthic O2 consumption and distribution
Settleddiatom‐aggregates remarkably modified theO2distribution in thesediment and enhanced the benthic O2demand. Hypoxic/anoxic areas developed inside the aggregates within a few hours from their settlement, indicating high mineralization activity and limiteddiffusive O2 transport (Ploug et al. 1997). Anoxic zones were persistently measured within or immediately below the aggregates for up to 53–143 h. Temporary (7–8 h) anoxic niches have been reported, by applying planar optodes, at the center of 2 mm diatom‐aggregates produced similarly to the ones used in this study and settled on marine sediment overlain with air‐saturatedwater (Glud 2008; Lehto et al. 2014). This is much shorter than the lifetime of aggregate‐associatedanoxia observed in our experiments, and it might be due to the lower O2 level of the overlying water in our incubations. Noticeably, however, our measurements have to be considered conservative as, contrary to planar optodes that limit O2 transport through the plane of measurements (Santner et al. 2015), microsensor application can enhance the transport of O2 into the aggregates by both compressing thediffusive boundary layer (Glud et al. 1994) and physically piercing the aggregate.Our transect measurements showed how the aggregates can influence the benthic O2distribution beyond the area that they physically occupy inducing changes at up to ∼ 5 mm distance into thesediment. Thesediment anoxic horizon consistently rose beneath the aggregates in all incubations. Time‐series measurements indicated that this state persisted even once oxic/hypoxic conditions had re‐established inside the aggregates. The expansion of the anoxic and zone of thesediment is likely the result of theO2 supply limitation due to both the active O2 consumption occurring within the aggregates and the longer diffusion pathway imposed by their physical presence. Dissolvedorganic carbon (DOC) and inorganic nutrient released from sinking aggregates have been shown to enhance microbial activity in pelagic systems (Kiorboe 2001; Azam and Malfatti 2007; Stocker et al. 2008). Likewise, the release of DIN and labile DOC from the settled aggregates (that have 15 times higher concentration of, and most likely also more reactive, OM than thesediment) could have enhanced the metabolic activity of theheterotrophic microbial community in thesediment underneath the aggregates.
Aggregate effect on DIN fluxes at the sediment–water interface
The settlement of aggregates transiently enhanced both the gross release and uptake of
(which together resulted in an enhanced net
consumption), and stimulated the net production of
and
of the benthic compartment. The average increase in gross
uptake accounted for the 91% of the increase in D
w (Fig. 6), suggesting that the increaseddenitrification activity drove the enhanced benthic
consumption (see later discussion). The increased gross
release indicated an input of 14
. Possible sources of 14
are nitrification activity in thesediment or in the aggregates, andICNO3 release from the aggregate‐associateddiatoms. Intracellular
concentrations in our aggregates (Table 1) aligned with previous studies on S. marinoi aggregates (Stief et al. 2016). The almost complete release (98%) of theICNO3 pool during the incubation experiment can however only account for 8.9% of the increase in gross
release. Instead, the gross release of
was more likely derived from degrading aggregate biomass as indicated by the following 15N‐labeled aggregates experiment. Accordingly, the average rate of
release from the15N‐labeled aggregates was very similar to the average increase in gross
release measured in the experiment with 15
labeledwater (8.4 μmol m−2 h−1). As 15N in the labeled aggregates was almost exclusively (99.8%) present as organic N, the increase in gross
release has to be attributed to nitrification activity fueled by
liberatedduring mineralization of the aggregate biomass.In contrast to O2 consumption, that was substantially elevated throughout the whole stimulation period, net
consumption peaked in two main events. Net
consumption summarizes gross
uptake and gross
release, which in turn respond to the expansion of the anoxic zone (and the consequent increase in D
w) and to the increase nitrification activity at the aggregate surface, respectively. These two events do not necessarily occur simultaneously. Their asynchronous occurrence is likely causing the intermittent increase in net
consumption.Thesediment was generally a net sink for
, which is consistent with nitrification activity in the surface layer (Stief et al. 2003). However, following the addition of aggregates, the average sediment net
uptake decreased and sporadic net
effluxes were recorded. Of the reduced net
uptake during the stimulation period, 75% can be attributed to enhanced
release from mineralization of aggregate biomass as calculated from the experiment with 15N‐labeled aggregates. Potentially, the stimulation of dissimilatory nitrate reduction to ammonium (DNRA) could also have contributed to the reduced net
uptake. This possibility was, however discarded, as the production of 15
did not increase throughout the experiment with 15
enrichedwater. The residual 25% of thedecrease in net
uptake has thus to be attributed to a decreasedsediment nitrification efficiency, which was also suggested by the concurrent drop in Dn.Net
production was recordedduring the initial phase of the incubation. Between the 59% and 82% of such emission was sustained by 15
production. Considering that the only source of 15N was
dissolved in the overlying water, and the15N atom percentage of
at the inlet (i.e., 86%), such 15
production rates indicates that 68–96% of the total net
production can be attributed to incomplete denitrification of overlying water
.
Aggregate effect on benthic denitrification and nitrification
The addition of the aggregates substantially stimulated 29N2 and 30N2 production. The period of maximum production aligned with the stimulation period further suggesting that the reducedO2 availability stimulateddenitrification. The residual stimulation of the production rates persisting during later measurements was likely due to a longer, less acute effect of the aggregates settlement (e.g., slow mineralization of recalcitrant OM). The settlement of aggregates increased the rate of denitrification fueled by
from the overlying water (D
w) anddecreased the contribution of denitrification fueled by
from sedimentary nitrification (Dn). The net effect on the total denitrification (D
tot), however, was negligible during most of the incubation period. Only whenDn recovered some time after the aggregate deposition, theD
tot increased substantially. The stimulation of D
w was probably favored by the expansion and branching of the anoxic sediment horizon below and inside the aggregates and the thinning of the oxic surface layer, which together increased the total exchange surface and reduced thediffusion pathway for
from the overlying water. The inverse relationship between O2 penetration depth andD
w intensity has been shown in previous studies (e.g., Christensen et al. 1990; Rysgaard et al. 1995). Thedenitrifying community which is generally considered to consist of mainly facultative anaerobes (Zumft 1997), is expected to rapidly switch from O2 to
respiration whenO2 is no longer available. Denitrifiers could further capitalize on the elevated input of labile organic carbon released from thedecaying aggregates. In addition, the lifting of the anoxic zone could have stimulated other anaerobic metabolisms (i.e., sulfate andiron oxides reduction) increasing the availability of H2S andFe2+ at shallower depths that could in turn, contributed to increase
reduction. However, iron‐dependent
reduction is expected to primarily produce
(Robertson et al. 2016). Increase in DNRA activity was not recorded after the addition of the aggregates. Therefore, such metabolisms, if active, must have been constrained to a marginal role.The reduced oxic portion of thesedimentdiminished the volume suitable for nitrification. It is to expect that upon an abrupt shrinkage of the oxic zone, the integrated nitrifying activity will be suppressed, at least transiently, until the microorganisms in the remaining oxic zone possibly increase their activity in response to the altered substrate concentrations. Furthermore, the accumulation of H2S at shallower depth due to the likely lifting of the
reduction zone, could have further inhibited nitrification activity (e.g., Joye and Hollibaugh 1995). The slow and gradual recovery of theDn after the initial inhibition period aligned with the gradual re‐oxygenation of thesediment as shown by the microprofiles.The aggregate‐induced change in local O2 availability is thus likely to cause a suppression of nitrification activity and an immediate stimulation of denitrification activity transiently uncoupling the two processes. High input of OM to intertidal sediment has been previously shown to both stimulate D
w (e.g., Caffrey 1993) and inhibit sediment nitrification (Caffrey 1993; Sloth 1995). However, these observations have been made in experimental set‐ups where high loads of OM (12–40 g C m−2) have been homogeneously spread onto thesediment surface, or mixed within the top sediment layer. Our study shows how similar effects may occur with lower loads (3.1 g C m−2), if the OM is delivered to thesediment, unevenly, as concentrated packages such as during the more realistic settlement of algae‐aggregates. In sediment with deeper O2 penetration, such as the one typical of deep‐sea environments, the inhibition of theDn would virtually be marginal (or absent) resulting in a more pronounced increase of the total denitrification. Aggregates burial as possibly induced by benthic fauna would further limit mass‐transfer processes around the aggregates. Such circumstances would favor thedevelopment of larger or longer lasting anoxic niches, with more pronounced effect on the benthic nitrogen cycling.Conversely to thedecrease in sediment nitrification,
was the main N species released by the mineralization (and consequent oxidation) of aggregate biomass (
:
: N‐N2 emission = 43 : 5 : 1) indicating pronounced nitrification activity in the oxic part of the aggregates (Fig. 6). Such efficient nitrification activity contrasts with recent reports on sinking aggregates where
release from mineralization was high and nitrification activity was negligible (Klawonn et al. 2015; Ploug and Bergkvist 2015; Stief et al. 2016). The lack of nitrification activity in sinking aggregates has been ascribed to the long doubling time of nitrifiers. On thesediment, inoculation of nitrifiers from the benthic community might have contributed to the establishment of such high rates of nitrification. The high
: N‐N2 fluxes ratio indicates a weak coupling between nitrification anddenitrification at the aggregate surface and that the newly produced
mainly diffused into the overlying water, presumably due to the small anoxic portion of the aggregate and the elliptical geometry of the aging aggregates.
Summary and perspectives
Diatom‐aggregates influenced the benthic turn‐over of O2 andnitrogen in several ways. Their settlement enhanced the net benthic O2 and
consumption and concurrently stimulated the
and
production. The shift in O2 availability anddiffusional pathways favored thedenitrification of
from the overlying water at the expense of coupled nitrification‐denitrification; this was partly due to a transient suppression of sediment nitrification. Furthermore, stimulated nitrification in the aggregates mainly induced a net release of
to the overlying water (Fig. 6). These effects were dynamic and were largely exhausted within 5–20 d.The study demonstrates that the partitioning of micro‐niches induced by the aggregates settlement impacts the benthic N cycling, and it furthermore provides a time‐frame for such impacts. Because of their ephemeral nature, these niches have so far been overlooked. Within the span of reported sinking velocities i.e., 10–569 m d−1 (e.g., Ploug et al. 1999; Iversen et al. 2010), 3‐ to 5‐day‐old aggregate such as the ones used in this study could reach the seafloor at waterdepths ranging between 10 m and > 2800 m. The scattereddeposition of aggregates can therefore contribute to determine the mosaic nature of sediments, and to set the temporal variation (succession from aerobic to anaerobic metabolisms) in confined microbial communities from coastal to deep‐sea benthic environments.Climate‐induced increases in phytoplankton productivity might enhance the export of biomass to thesediment in the form of aggregates especially in polar settings. This will potentially increase the microniche structure and, as seen here, affect benthic nitrogen (and possibly other nutrients) cycling.
Authors: S Seitzinger; J A Harrison; J K Böhlke; A F Bouwman; R Lowrance; B Peterson; C Tobias; G Van Drecht Journal: Ecol Appl Date: 2006-12 Impact factor: 4.657
Authors: Antje Boetius; Sebastian Albrecht; Karel Bakker; Christina Bienhold; Janine Felden; Mar Fernández-Méndez; Stefan Hendricks; Christian Katlein; Catherine Lalande; Thomas Krumpen; Marcel Nicolaus; Ilka Peeken; Benjamin Rabe; Antonina Rogacheva; Elena Rybakova; Raquel Somavilla; Frank Wenzhöfer Journal: Science Date: 2013-02-14 Impact factor: 47.728
Authors: Roman Stocker; Justin R Seymour; Azadeh Samadani; Dana E Hunt; Martin F Polz Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 2008-03-12 Impact factor: 11.205