Literature DB >> 29456134

Parietal control network activation during memory tasks may be associated with the co-occurrence of externally and internally directed cognition: A cross-function meta-analysis.

Hongkeun Kim1.   

Abstract

Functional neuroimaging studies on episodic memory retrieval consistently indicated the activation of the precuneus (PCU), mid-cingulate cortex (MCC), and lateral intraparietal sulcus (latIPS) regions. Although studies typically interpreted these activations in terms of memory retrieval processes, resting-state functional connectivity data indicate that these regions are part of the frontoparietal control network, suggesting a more general, cross-functional role. In this regard, this study proposes a novel hypothesis which suggests that the parietal control network plays a strong role in accommodating the co-occurrence of externally directed cognition (EDC) and internally directed cognition (IDC), which are typically antagonistic to each other. To evaluate how well this dual cognitive processes hypothesis can account for parietal activation patterns during memory tasks, this study provides a cross-function meta-analysis involving 3 different memory paradigms, namely, retrieval success (hit > correct rejection), repetition enhancement (repeated > novel), and subsequent forgetting (forgotten > remembered). Common to these paradigms is that the target condition may involve both EDC (stimulus processing and motor responding) and IDC (intentional remembering, involuntary awareness of previous encounter, or task-unrelated thoughts) strongly, whereas the reference condition may involve EDC to a greater extent, but IDC to a lesser extent. Thus, the dual cognitive processes hypothesis predicts that each of these paradigms will activate similar, overlapping PCU, MCC, and latIPS regions. The results were fully consistent with the prediction, supporting the dual cognitive processes hypothesis. Evidence from relevant prior studies suggests that the dual cognitive processes hypothesis may also apply to non-memory domain tasks.
Copyright © 2018 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Encoding; Memory; Meta-analysis; Mind-wandering; Retrieval; fMRI

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29456134     DOI: 10.1016/j.brainres.2018.01.022

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Brain Res        ISSN: 0006-8993            Impact factor:   3.252


  6 in total

1.  Neural activity during working memory encoding, maintenance, and retrieval: A network-based model and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Hongkeun Kim
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2019-08-02       Impact factor: 5.038

2.  Identifying task-general effects of stimulus familiarity in the parietal memory network.

Authors:  Adrian W Gilmore; Sarah E Kalinowski; Shawn C Milleville; Stephen J Gotts; Alex Martin
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2019-01-02       Impact factor: 3.139

3.  The functional dissociation of posterior parietal regions during multimodal memory formation.

Authors:  Julia Jablonowski; Michael Rose
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2022-04-09       Impact factor: 5.399

4.  Eye behavior does not adapt to expected visual distraction during internally directed cognition.

Authors:  Sonja Annerer-Walcher; Christof Körner; Mathias Benedek
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-09-28       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  When I relive a positive me: Vivid autobiographical memories facilitate autonoetic brain activation and enhance mood.

Authors:  Charlotte C van Schie; Chui-De Chiu; Serge A R B Rombouts; Willem J Heiser; Bernet M Elzinga
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2019-07-26       Impact factor: 5.038

6.  Parietal memory network and default mode network in first-episode drug-naïve schizophrenia: Associations with auditory hallucination.

Authors:  Qian Guo; Yang Hu; Botao Zeng; Yingying Tang; Guanjun Li; Tianhong Zhang; Jinhong Wang; Georg Northoff; Chunbo Li; Donald Goff; Jijun Wang; Zhi Yang
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2020-02-29       Impact factor: 5.038

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.