Sam Liu1, Dina Brooks2, Scott G Thomas3, Gunther Eysenbach4, Robert P Nolan5. 1. School of Exercise Science, Physical and Health Education, Faculty of Education, University of Victoria, Victoria, British Columbia, Canada. Electronic address: samliu@uvic.ca. 2. Department of Physical Therapy, Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada. 3. Department of Exercise Sciences, Faculty of Kinesiology and Physical Education, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada. 4. Center for Global eHealth Innovation, University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada. 5. Cardiac eHealth Research Unit, University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: The effectiveness of self-guided Internet-based lifestyle counseling (e-counseling) varies, depending on treatment protocol. Two dominant procedures in e-counseling are expert- and user-driven. The influence of these procedures on hypertension management remains unclear. The objective was to assess whether blood pressure improved with expert-driven or user-driven e-counseling over control intervention in patients with hypertension over a 4-month period. STUDY DESIGN: This study used a three-parallel group, double-blind randomized controlled design. SETTING/PARTICIPANTS: In Toronto, Canada, 128 participants (aged 35-74 years) with hypertension were recruited. Participants were recruited using online and poster advertisements. Data collection took place between June 2012 and June 2014. Data were analyzed from October 2014 to December 2016. INTERVENTION: Controls received a weekly e-mail newsletter regarding hypertension management. The expert-driven group was prescribed a weekly exercise and diet plan (e.g., increase 1,000 steps/day this week). The user-driven group received weekly e-mail, which allowed participants to choose their intervention goals (e.g., [1] feel more confident to change my lifestyle, or [2] self-help tips for exercise or a heart healthy diet). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Primary outcome was systolic blood pressure measured at baseline and 4-month follow-up. Secondary outcomes included cholesterol, 10-year Framingham cardiovascular risk, daily steps, and dietary habits. RESULTS: Expert-driven groups showed a greater systolic blood pressure decrease than controls at follow-up (expert-driven versus control: -7.5 mmHg, 95% CI= -12.5, -2.6, p=0.01). Systolic blood pressure reduction did not significantly differ between user- and expert-driven. Expert-driven compared with controls also showed a significant improvement in pulse pressure, cholesterol, and Framingham risk score. The expert-driven intervention was significantly more effective than both user-driven and control groups in increasing daily steps and fruit intake. CONCLUSIONS: It may be advisable to incorporate an expert-driven e-counseling protocol in order to accommodate participants with greater motivation to change their lifestyle behaviors, but more studies are needed. TRIAL REGISTRATION: This study is registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov NCT03111836.
RCT Entities:
INTRODUCTION: The effectiveness of self-guided Internet-based lifestyle counseling (e-counseling) varies, depending on treatment protocol. Two dominant procedures in e-counseling are expert- and user-driven. The influence of these procedures on hypertension management remains unclear. The objective was to assess whether blood pressure improved with expert-driven or user-driven e-counseling over control intervention in patients with hypertension over a 4-month period. STUDY DESIGN: This study used a three-parallel group, double-blind randomized controlled design. SETTING/PARTICIPANTS: In Toronto, Canada, 128 participants (aged 35-74 years) with hypertension were recruited. Participants were recruited using online and poster advertisements. Data collection took place between June 2012 and June 2014. Data were analyzed from October 2014 to December 2016. INTERVENTION: Controls received a weekly e-mail newsletter regarding hypertension management. The expert-driven group was prescribed a weekly exercise and diet plan (e.g., increase 1,000 steps/day this week). The user-driven group received weekly e-mail, which allowed participants to choose their intervention goals (e.g., [1] feel more confident to change my lifestyle, or [2] self-help tips for exercise or a heart healthy diet). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Primary outcome was systolic blood pressure measured at baseline and 4-month follow-up. Secondary outcomes included cholesterol, 10-year Framingham cardiovascular risk, daily steps, and dietary habits. RESULTS: Expert-driven groups showed a greater systolic blood pressure decrease than controls at follow-up (expert-driven versus control: -7.5 mmHg, 95% CI= -12.5, -2.6, p=0.01). Systolic blood pressure reduction did not significantly differ between user- and expert-driven. Expert-driven compared with controls also showed a significant improvement in pulse pressure, cholesterol, and Framingham risk score. The expert-driven intervention was significantly more effective than both user-driven and control groups in increasing daily steps and fruit intake. CONCLUSIONS: It may be advisable to incorporate an expert-driven e-counseling protocol in order to accommodate participants with greater motivation to change their lifestyle behaviors, but more studies are needed. TRIAL REGISTRATION: This study is registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov NCT03111836.
Authors: Sam Liu; Joy Weismiller; Karen Strange; Lisa Forster-Coull; Jennifer Bradbury; Tom Warshawski; Patti-Jean Naylor Journal: BMC Pediatr Date: 2020-08-20 Impact factor: 2.125
Authors: Nicole L Guthrie; Mark A Berman; Katherine L Edwards; Kevin J Appelbaum; Sourav Dey; Jason Carpenter; David M Eisenberg; David L Katz Journal: JMIR Cardio Date: 2019-03-12
Authors: Juan Francisco Lisón; Gonzalo Palomar; Marinna S Mensorio; Rosa M Baños; Ausiàs Cebolla-Martí; Cristina Botella; Vicent Benavent-Caballer; Enrique Rodilla Journal: J Med Internet Res Date: 2020-04-14 Impact factor: 5.428
Authors: Li Feng Xie; Alexandra Itzkovitz; Amelie Roy-Fleming; Deborah Da Costa; Anne-Sophie Brazeau Journal: J Med Internet Res Date: 2020-08-13 Impact factor: 5.428
Authors: Samantha Hajna; Stephen J Sharp; Andrew J M Cooper; Kate M Williams; Esther M F van Sluijs; Soren Brage; Simon J Griffin; Stephen Sutton Journal: Am J Prev Med Date: 2021-03 Impact factor: 5.043