Literature DB >> 29455322

A novel device for air removal from vascular access line: a bench study.

Zeping Xu1,2, Lingyan Jin2, Byron Smith3, Yiping Bai2, Haoxiang Luo4, Lars Axel Strombergsson5, Min Fei6, Yandong Jiang7.   

Abstract

Efficient air removal from a vascular access line is a key step to prevent air embolism. Existing devices, especially for rapid infusers, are far from optimum. In this study, we developed a novel device, vascular access line air removal device (VALARD), and compared its efficiency of air removal and pause time of forward bulk flow with a commonly used device, the Belmont pump. Part I experiment, saline was infused at a forward bulk flow rate of 250, 500, and 750 mL/min. Meanwhile, air was introduced into the infusion line at a rate of 5, 10, and 15 mL/min for each bulk flow rate. Air bubbles > 10 µL downstream from either the VALARD or the Belmont pump and the fraction of pause time of the forward bulk flow were determined. Part II experiment, 120 mL of air was rapidly introduced into the VALARD at a bulk flow rate of about 500 mL/min. Air bubbles > 10 µL downstream from the VALARD, fraction of pause time of the forward bulk flow, and the transit time of the 120 mL of air at the working chamber were recorded. The VALARD: no air bubbles > 10 µL were detected during any tested combination of air injection and bulk flow rates without pause of forward flow. The Belmont pump: air bubbles > 10 µL were detected in 60% of the tests with pause of the forward flow. The VALARD eliminates air efficiently without pause of the forward bulk flow. Further clinical trials are needed to compare the VALARD with other devices and to assess its efficiency, safety, and user friendliness.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Air embolism; Complication; Fluid resuscitation; Infusion pump; Intravenous infusion; Transfusion

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29455322     DOI: 10.1007/s10877-018-0114-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Monit Comput        ISSN: 1387-1307            Impact factor:   2.502


  14 in total

1.  Relative performance of the level 1 and ranger pressure infusion devices.

Authors:  Michael P Eaton; Anahat K Dhillon
Journal:  Anesth Analg       Date:  2003-10       Impact factor: 5.108

2.  The air elimination capabilities of pressure infusion devices and fluid-warmers.

Authors:  J Schnoor; S Macko; I Weber; R Rossaint
Journal:  Anaesthesia       Date:  2004-08       Impact factor: 6.955

3.  Air elimination capability in rapid infusion systems.

Authors:  N Zoremba; C Gruenewald; M Zoremba; R Rossaint; G Schaelte
Journal:  Anaesthesia       Date:  2011-11       Impact factor: 6.955

4.  An Evaluation of Induced Failure Modes in the Belmont® Rapid Infuser.

Authors:  Richard B Boyer; Kyle M Hocking; Garrett S Booth; James M Berry; Travis W Spain; Damon R Michaels; Warren S Sandberg; Michael A Pilla
Journal:  Anesth Analg       Date:  2016-04       Impact factor: 5.108

Review 5.  Diagnosis and treatment of vascular air embolism.

Authors:  Marek A Mirski; Abhijit Vijay Lele; Lunei Fitzsimmons; Thomas J K Toung
Journal:  Anesthesiology       Date:  2007-01       Impact factor: 7.892

6.  Intravenous Air: The Partially Invisible Phenomenon.

Authors:  Christopher Varga; Isaac Luria; Nikolaus Gravenstein
Journal:  Anesth Analg       Date:  2016-11       Impact factor: 5.108

7.  Avoiding air infusion with pressurized infusion systems: a new hazard.

Authors:  B K Philip; J H Philip
Journal:  Anesth Analg       Date:  1985-03       Impact factor: 5.108

8.  Air embolism during insertion of central venous catheters.

Authors:  T M Vesely
Journal:  J Vasc Interv Radiol       Date:  2001-11       Impact factor: 3.464

9.  Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services' "never events": an analysis and recommendations to hospitals.

Authors:  Angela S Mattie; Barry L Webster
Journal:  Health Care Manag (Frederick)       Date:  2008 Oct-Dec

10.  Air Embolism: Diagnosis, Clinical Management and Outcomes.

Authors:  Colin J McCarthy; Sasan Behravesh; Sailendra G Naidu; Rahmi Oklu
Journal:  Diagnostics (Basel)       Date:  2017-01-17
View more
  1 in total

Review 1.  Journal of clinical monitoring and computing end of year summary 2018: hemodynamic monitoring and management.

Authors:  Bernd Saugel; Moritz Flick; Karim Bendjelid; Lester A H Critchley; Simon T Vistisen; Thomas W L Scheeren
Journal:  J Clin Monit Comput       Date:  2019-03-07       Impact factor: 2.502

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.