| Literature DB >> 29455311 |
Jiaming Mi1, Dabing Yang1, Yi Chen1, Jiefeng Jiang1, Haipeng Mou1, Junbin Huang2, Yidan Ouyang1, Tongmin Mou3.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Breeding two-line hybrid rice with disease resistance is an effective approach to stabilize rice yield in commercial rice production of China.Entities:
Keywords: Bacterial blight resistance; Blast resistance; Marker-assisted selection; Next-generation sequencing; Oryza sativa L.; Two-line hybrid rice
Year: 2018 PMID: 29455311 PMCID: PMC5816735 DOI: 10.1186/s12284-018-0203-8
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Rice (N Y) ISSN: 1939-8425 Impact factor: 4.783
Fig. 1The flowchart for the development of disease-resistant Hua1228S. MAS, marker-assisted selection
Fig. 2Genotype of the newly-developed P/TGMS line Hua1228S with disease resistance under the generic background of Guangzhan63-4S, based on the next-generation sequencing. Twelve chromosomes of rice are labeled with 1 to 12. The reference genome is Nipponbare (MSU 7.0). The gray, red, and blue boxes indicate the substituted segments of the recurrent parent Guangzhan63-4S and the two donor parents VE6219 and YR7029–39, respectively
Fig. 3Fertility-sterility alteration pattern of Hua1228S in 2013 at Wuhan. a-c Pollen grains from Hua1228S on 15th August (a), 18th September (b) and 26th September (c). d Dynamic pollen fertility of the newly-developed P/TGMS lines Hua1228S and Guangzhan63-4S relative to daily mean temperature and day length from 12th July to 26th September. Error bars, s. e. m. Scale bars: 50 μm
Fig. 4Blast resistance level of Hua1228S and Guangzhan63-4S in natural field with serious blast epidemic in 2014 and 2015. a Leaf blast resistance level at tillering stage. b Incidence level of neck blast at maturity stage. c Loss level of neck blast at maturity stage
Disease reaction of Hua1228S to 33 isolates of M. oryzae
| Blast race | Isolates No. | CO39 (CK) | Guangzhan63-4S | Hua1228S |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ZA01 | GD-15KP01 | S | S | R |
| ZA01 | GD-15KP02 | S | S | R |
| ZA05 | GD-15KP03 | S | S | R |
| ZA13 | GD-15KP04 | S | S | R |
| ZA13 | GD-15KP05 | S | S | R |
| ZA13 | GD-15KP06 | S | S | R |
| ZA13 | GD-15KP07 | S | S | R |
| ZA13 | GD-15KP08 | S | S | S |
| ZA15 | GD-15KP09 | S | R | R |
| ZA37 | GD-15KP10 | S | S | R |
| ZB01 | GD-15KP11 | S | S | R |
| ZB01 | GD-15KP12 | S | S | R |
| ZB05 | GD-15KP13 | S | S | R |
| ZB13 | GD-15KP14 | S | S | R |
| ZB13 | GD-15KP15 | S | S | R |
| ZB13 | GD-15KP16 | S | S | R |
| ZB13 | GD-15KP17 | S | S | R |
| ZB13 | GD-15KP18 | S | S | R |
| ZB13 | GD-15KP19 | S | S | R |
| ZB13 | GD-15KP20 | S | S | R |
| ZB13 | GD-15KP21 | S | S | R |
| ZB13 | GD-15KP22 | S | S | R |
| ZB13 | GD-15KP23 | S | S | S |
| ZB13 | GD-15KP24 | S | S | R |
| ZB13 | GD-15KP25 | R | S | S |
| ZB13 | GD-15KP26 | S | S | R |
| ZC03 | GD-15KP27 | S | R | R |
| ZC05 | GD-15KP28 | S | R | R |
| ZC13 | GD-15KP29 | S | S | R |
| ZC13 | GD-15KP30 | S | S | R |
| ZC13 | GD-15KP31 | S | S | R |
| ZC13 | GD-15KP32 | S | S | R |
| ZC15 | GD-15KP33 | S | R | R |
| Amount of incompatible isolates | 1 | 4 | 30 | |
| Percentage of incompatible isolates (%) | 3.03 | 12.12 | 90.91 | |
Note: R and S indicate resistance and susceptibility, respectively
Fig. 5Reaction patterns of Hua1228S and Guangzhan63-4S to seven Xoo strains. a Lesion patterns on leaves of Guangzhan63-4S and Hua1228S plants were used to show the lesion patterns. Pictures were taken at 21st-day after inoculation. b Resistance level of bacterial blight based on the lesion length. Lesion length was scored at 21st-day after inoculation. HR, high resistance; R, resistance; MR, moderate resistance; MS, moderate susceptible; S susceptible; HS, high susceptible. Scale bars: 10 cm. Error bars, s. d
Agronomic performance of the improved line Hua1228S and the recurrent parent Guangzhan63-4S in Wuhan and Hainan
| Trait | Summer season (sterile) at Wuhan in 2014 | Winter season (fertile) at Hainan in 2015 | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Guangzhan63-4S | Hua1228S | Guangzhan63-4S | Hua1228S | |
| Days to heading (d) | 87.3 ± 6.1 | 88.0 ± 6.1 | 108.0 ± 9.5 | 108.7 ± 9.1 |
| Plant height (cm) | 91.6 ± 4.7 | 93.0 ± 4.6 | 94.7 ± 2.0 | 101.3 ± 2.5 |
| Panicle number | 9.9 ± 1.3 | 9.4 ± 2.0 | 7.1 ± 1.3 | 7.1 ± 0.9 |
| Panicle length (cm) | 24.5 ± 1.0 | 24.1 ± 1.5 | 21.3 ± 0.4 | 22.2 ± 0.7 |
| Number of spikelet per panicle | 158.9 ± 13.5 | 161.4 ± 14.1 | 156.3 ± 5.3 | 162.2 ± 4.3 |
| Seed setting rate (%) |
|
| 84.8 ± 5.1 | 82.7 ± 4.0 |
| 1000-grain weight (g) |
|
| 27.8 ± 0.6 | 28.9 ± 1.0 |
| Stigma exertion rate (%) | 35.9 ± 15.5 | 53.7 ± 9.2 |
|
|
| Yield per plant (g) |
|
| 25.8 ± 3.5 | 27.4 ± 4.2 |
Note: The value of agronomic traits is measured as mean ± s. d. ** and *indicate significant difference of the trait performance between the improved line and the control line at P < 0.01 and P < 0.05, respectively
Blast/bacterial blight resistance and yield test for the hybrid combinations Hua Liangyou 2821 and Hua Liangyou 284 in 2015 and 2016
| Trait | Hubei Rice Variety Regional Trialsa | National Rice Variety Regional Trialsb | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Hua Liangyou 2821 | Feng Liangyou 4 (CK) | Hua Liangyou 284 | Feng Liangyou 4 (CK) | |
| 2015 | ||||
| Leaf blast score | 3.3 ± 1.0** | 6.8 ± 1.3 | 2.7 ± 1.8** | 5.5 ± 2.2 |
| Incidence score of neck blast | 5.0 ± 1.6 | 8.0 ± 2.0 | 6.7 ± 0.8* | 8.7 ± 0.8 |
| Loss score of neck blast | 1.5 ± 1.0* | 7.0 ± 2.8 | 3.7 ± 1.0** | 7.7 ± 1.6 |
| Lesion length of bacterial blight (cm) c | 4.2 ± 0.9** | 10.3 ± 1.1 | 1.3 ± 0.2** | 8.6 ± 1.7 |
| Yield (t ha−1) | 10.41 ± 1.06* | 10.11 ± 1.13 | 9.97 ± 1.25** | 9.42 ± 1.29 |
| 2016 | ||||
| Leaf blast score | 3.3 ± 1.5* | 6.8 ± 1.3 | 3.3 ± 2.2* | 6.7 ± 1.5 |
| Incidence score of neck blast | 4.5 ± 1.9* | 8.5 ± 1.0 | 7.7 ± 2.4 | 8.7 ± 0.8 |
| Loss score of neck blast | 1.5 ± 1.0* | 7.0 ± 2.8 | 3.9 ± 2.1* | 7.7 ± 1.0 |
| Lesion length of bacterial blight (cm)c | 2.0 ± 0.2** | 7.1 ± 0.7 | 4.7 ± 1.2** | 11.1 ± 1.3 |
| Yield (t ha− 1) | 8.97 ± 1.35 | 9.04 ± 1.42 | 9.33 ± 1.27* | 8.88 ± 0.93 |
Note: aHubei Rice Variety Regional Trials were conducted in 9 field test sites according to methods and standards of Rice Variety Regional Trial in Hubei province. bNational Rice Variety Regional Trials were conducted in 21 field test sites according to methods and standards of National Rice Variety Regional Trial. c indicates the lesion length to Xoo isolate ZHE173. The value of traits is measured as mean ± s. d. ** and * indicate significant difference of the trait performance between the improved hybrid combinations and the control variety Feng Liangyou 4 at P < 0.01 and P < 0.05, respectively