Literature DB >> 29455061

Relationship between nurse staffing level and adult nursing-sensitive outcomes in tertiary hospitals of Korea: Retrospective observational study.

Chul-Gyu Kim1, Kyun-Seop Bae2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Nurse staffing level is an important factor on nursing sensitive outcome. The relationships of nurse staffing level with nursing sensitive outcomes such as mortality, upper gastrointestinal bleeding and pressure ulcer have been explored in the United States, Canada, Australia, and New Zealand. Lower level of hospital nurse staffing seems associated with more adverse outcomes, especially mortality. However, there is insufficient evidence of the nurse staffing level-outcome relationship in other indicators.
OBJECTIVES: This study was conducted to describe the status and prove the relationships of nurse staffing level with nursing sensitive outcome indicators for adult medical and surgical inpatients in Korea. Patient and hospital characteristics as covariates on nurse sensitive outcome were also explored.
DESIGN: This was a retrospective observational study.
SETTING: The study setting was all 46 tertiary hospitals in Korea. PARTICIPANTS: We selected all anonymized patients aged 19 years or older and admitted at tertiary hospitals for two years (2013-2014) using electronic reimbursement claims data.
METHOD: Multiple logistic regression was used to examine relationships of nurse staffing level (accounted for full-time registered nurses in general ward only) with Nursing-sensitive outcomes (NSOs) adjusted for patient and hospital characteristics. NSOs included urinary tract infection, upper gastrointestinal tract bleeding, deep vein thrombosis, hospital-acquired pneumonia, pressure ulcer, sepsis, shock/cardiac arrest, CNS complication, in-hospital death, wound infection, physiologic/metabolic derangement and pulmonary failure.
RESULTS: The total number of patients in 46 tertiary hospitals in Korea for two years was 3,665,307. Among these, number of patients who had at least one nursing-sensitive outcome was 338,369 (9.23%). The significant relationships of nurse staffing level with six nursing-sensitive outcome rates (urinary tract infection, upper gastrointestinal tract bleeding, hospital-acquired pneumonia, shock/cardiac arrest, in-hospital death, and wound infection) were shown. These six nursing-sensitive outcomes showed an increasing trend as nurse staffing level degraded even after adjusting for patient and hospital characteristics. When the nursing-sensitive outcomes between those of group 1 (bed-to-nurse ratio < 2:1) and group 3 (between 2.5:1 and 3:1) were compared, the adjusted incidence rate of shock/cardiac arrest showed the highest difference (1.06%).
CONCLUSION: We demonstrated strong evidence for the relationships of nurse staffing level with six nursing-sensitive outcomes. We can use this study to improve nursing quality and to inform patients of the nursing quality of hospitals so they can choose hospitals with better nursing quality. The nurse staffing level should be optimized for better outcomes.
Copyright © 2018 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Health care; Indicators; Nursing care; Patient outcome assessment; Quality; Risk adjustment

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29455061     DOI: 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2018.01.001

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Nurs Stud        ISSN: 0020-7489            Impact factor:   5.837


  8 in total

1.  Safety culture and adverse event reporting in Ghanaian healthcare facilities: Implications for patient safety.

Authors:  Aaron Asibi Abuosi; Collins Atta Poku; Priscilla Y A Attafuah; Emmanuel Anongeba Anaba; Patience Aseweh Abor; Adelaide Setordji; Edward Nketiah-Amponsah
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-10-19       Impact factor: 3.752

2.  Activity-based funding for safety and quality: A policy discussion of issues and directions for nursing-focused health services outcomes research.

Authors:  Liza Heslop
Journal:  Int J Nurs Pract       Date:  2019-08-15       Impact factor: 2.226

3.  Nurse-staffing level and quality of acute care services: Evidence from cross-national panel data analysis in OECD countries.

Authors:  Arshia Amiri; Tytti Solankallio-Vahteri
Journal:  Int J Nurs Sci       Date:  2018-12-05

4.  A quantitative systematic review of the association between nurse skill mix and nursing-sensitive patient outcomes in the acute care setting.

Authors:  Diane E Twigg; Yvonne Kutzer; Elisabeth Jacob; Karla Seaman
Journal:  J Adv Nurs       Date:  2019-10-03       Impact factor: 3.187

5.  Comprehensive risk assessment for hospital-acquired pneumonia: sociodemographic, clinical, and hospital environmental factors associated with the incidence of hospital-acquired pneumonia.

Authors:  Bo-Guen Kim; Minwoong Kang; Jihyun Lim; Jin Lee; Danbee Kang; Minjung Kim; Jinhee Kim; Hyejeong Park; Kyung Hoon Min; Juhee Cho; Kyeongman Jeon
Journal:  BMC Pulm Med       Date:  2022-01-12       Impact factor: 3.317

6.  Work interruptions and missed nursing care: A necessary evil or an opportunity? The role of nurses' sense of controllability.

Authors:  Nasra Abdelhadi; Anat Drach-Zahavy; Einav Srulovici
Journal:  Nurs Open       Date:  2021-10-06

7.  Nurse staffing and patient-perceived quality of nursing care: a cross-sectional analysis of survey and administrative data in German hospitals.

Authors:  Vera Winter; Karina Dietermann; Udo Schneider; Jonas Schreyögg
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2021-11-09       Impact factor: 2.692

8.  Risk factors for newly acquired pressure ulcer and the impact of nurse staffing on pressure ulcer incidence.

Authors:  Jinhyun Kim; Jai-Yon Lee; Eunhee Lee
Journal:  J Nurs Manag       Date:  2020-02-25       Impact factor: 4.680

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.