Literature DB >> 29454884

Illusory edges comingle with real edges in the neural representation of objects.

Sarah L Elliott1, Steven K Shevell2.   

Abstract

The visual system must transform a point-by-point biological representation from the photoreceptors into neural representations of separate objects. Even a uniform circular patch of light that slowly modulates in luminance can be segmented into separate central and surrounding areas merely by introducing black lines to outline a central square. The black lines cause brightness induction in the center even though the light inside and outside the square is always identical, as predicted by spatial antagonism between the square central area and its surround. Importantly, illusory Kanizsa lines forming the square are as effective for this brightness induction as real black lines, suggesting a 'form-cue invariant' cortical neural representation that does not distinguish between a central region set off by real or illusory edges. An open question is whether separate subsystems generate objects defined by real versus illusory edges, each providing the same form-cue invariant neural representation of an object, or whether form-cue invariance extends to integrating component pieces that together define an object. Experiments here show object segmentation when subparts of a square are defined by a mixture of real and illusory edges. Subjects adjusted the Michelson contrast of a separate patch to match the perceived modulation depth within the central region of a circular field that slowly oscillated in luminance. A closed, four-sided figure, no matter how constructed, reduced the perceived modulation depth within the central region. This shows that both real and illusory subparts can be integrated to segment center from surround. It supports a strong version of form-cue invariance in which neural mechanisms responsible for object segmentation are impartial to the piecemeal cues that are integrated to define an object.
Copyright © 2018 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Illusory figures; Neural mechanisms; Object perception

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29454884      PMCID: PMC5866783          DOI: 10.1016/j.visres.2018.01.006

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Vision Res        ISSN: 0042-6989            Impact factor:   1.886


  38 in total

1.  Differences in real and illusory shape perception revealed by backward masking.

Authors:  Michelle L Imber; Robert M Shapley; Nava Rubin
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2005-01       Impact factor: 1.886

2.  Mechanisms of modal and amodal interpolation.

Authors:  Marc K Albert
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  2007-04       Impact factor: 8.934

3.  Spatial and temporal properties of illusory contours and amodal boundary completion.

Authors:  D L Ringach; R Shapley
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1996-10       Impact factor: 1.886

4.  Spatial interactions with real and gap-induced illusory lines in vernier acuity.

Authors:  H H Greene; J M Brown
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1997-03       Impact factor: 1.886

5.  Figure-ground organization in real and subjective contours: a new ambiguous figure, some novel measures of ambiguity, and apparent distance across regions of figure and ground.

Authors:  M D Shank; J T Walker
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1989-08

6.  The Bourdon illusion in subjective contours.

Authors:  J T Walker; M D Shank
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1987-07

7.  The relationship between brightness contrast and illusory contours.

Authors:  M K Jory; R H Day
Journal:  Perception       Date:  1979       Impact factor: 1.490

8.  Illusory, motion, and luminance-defined contours interact in the human visual system.

Authors:  M A Berkley; B Debruyn; G Orban
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1994-01       Impact factor: 1.886

9.  On the perception of illusory contours.

Authors:  V S Ramachandran; D Ruskin; S Cobb; D Rogers-Ramachandran; C W Tyler
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1994-12       Impact factor: 1.886

10.  Perceived segmentation of center from surround by only illusory contours causes chromatic lateral inhibition.

Authors:  Sarah L Elliott; Steven K Shevell
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2013-04-23       Impact factor: 1.886

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.