Literature DB >> 29454649

Relationship between vectorcardiographic QRSarea, myocardial scar quantification, and response to cardiac resynchronization therapy.

Uyên Châu Nguyên1, Simon Claridge2, Kevin Vernooy3, Elien B Engels4, Reza Razavi5, Christopher A Rinaldi2, Zhong Chen2, Frits W Prinzen4.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To investigate the relationship between vectorcardiography (VCG) and myocardial scar on cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) imaging, and whether combining these metrics may improve cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) response prediction.
METHODS: Thirty-three CRT patients were included. QRSarea, Tarea and QRSTarea were derived from the ECG-synthesized VCG. CMR parameters reflecting focal scar core (Scar2SD, Gray2SD) and diffuse fibrosis (pre-T1, extracellular volume [ECV]) were assessed. CRT response was defined as ≥15% reduction in left ventricular end-systolic volume after six months' follow-up.
RESULTS: VCG QRSarea, Tarea and QRSTarea inversely correlated with focal scar (R = -0.44--0.58 for Scar2SD, p ≤ 0.010), but not with diffuse fibrosis. Scar2SD, Gray2SD and QRSarea predicted CRT response with AUCs of 0.692 (p = 0.063), 0.759 (p = 0.012) and 0.737 (p = 0.022) respectively. A combined ROC-derived threshold for Scar2SD and QRSarea resulted in 92% CRT response rate for patients with large QRSarea and small Scar2SD or Gray2SD.
CONCLUSION: QRSarea is inversely associated with focal scar on CMR. Incremental predictive value for CRT response is achieved by a combined CMR-QRSarea analysis.
Copyright © 2018. Published by Elsevier Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cardiac magnetic resonance imaging; Cardiac resynchronization therapy; Myocardial scar; Vectorcardiography

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29454649     DOI: 10.1016/j.jelectrocard.2018.01.009

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Electrocardiol        ISSN: 0022-0736            Impact factor:   1.438


  11 in total

Review 1.  The role of cardiac magnetic resonance in identifying appropriate candidates for cardiac resynchronization therapy - a systematic review of the literature.

Authors:  George Bazoukis; Jeremy Man Ho Hui; Yan Hiu Athena Lee; Oscar Hou In Chou; Dimitrios Sfairopoulos; Konstantinos Vlachos; Athanasios Saplaouras; Konstantinos P Letsas; Michael Efremidis; Gary Tse; Vassilios S Vassiliou; Panagiotis Korantzopoulos
Journal:  Heart Fail Rev       Date:  2022-08-31       Impact factor: 4.654

2.  Reliable Detection of Myocardial Ischemia Using Machine Learning Based on Temporal-Spatial Characteristics of Electrocardiogram and Vectorcardiogram.

Authors:  Xiaoye Zhao; Jucheng Zhang; Yinglan Gong; Lihua Xu; Haipeng Liu; Shujun Wei; Yuan Wu; Ganhua Cha; Haicheng Wei; Jiandong Mao; Ling Xia
Journal:  Front Physiol       Date:  2022-05-30       Impact factor: 4.755

3.  Machine Learning of 12-Lead QRS Waveforms to Identify Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy Patients With Differential Outcomes.

Authors:  Albert K Feeny; John Rickard; Kevin M Trulock; Divyang Patel; Saleem Toro; Laurie Ann Moennich; Niraj Varma; Mark J Niebauer; Eiran Z Gorodeski; Richard A Grimm; John Barnard; Anant Madabhushi; Mina K Chung
Journal:  Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol       Date:  2020-06-14

Review 4.  Electrical management of heart failure: from pathophysiology to treatment.

Authors:  Frits W Prinzen; Angelo Auricchio; Wilfried Mullens; Cecilia Linde; Jose F Huizar
Journal:  Eur Heart J       Date:  2022-05-21       Impact factor: 35.855

5.  The relationship between ECG predictors of cardiac resynchronization therapy benefit.

Authors:  Josef Halamek; Pavel Leinveber; Ivo Viscor; Radovan Smisek; Filip Plesinger; Vlastimil Vondra; Jolana Lipoldova; Magdalena Matejkova; Pavel Jurak
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-05-31       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Reduction in the QRS area after cardiac resynchronization therapy is associated with survival and echocardiographic response.

Authors:  Mohammed A Ghossein; Antonius M W van Stipdonk; Filip Plesinger; Mariëlle Kloosterman; Philippe C Wouters; Odette A E Salden; Mathias Meine; Alexander H Maass; Frits W Prinzen; Kevin Vernooy
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol       Date:  2021-01-28

7.  Machine Learning Prediction of Cardiac Resynchronisation Therapy Response From Combination of Clinical and Model-Driven Data.

Authors:  Svyatoslav Khamzin; Arsenii Dokuchaev; Anastasia Bazhutina; Tatiana Chumarnaya; Stepan Zubarev; Tamara Lyubimtseva; Viktoria Lebedeva; Dmitry Lebedev; Viatcheslav Gurev; Olga Solovyova
Journal:  Front Physiol       Date:  2021-12-14       Impact factor: 4.566

8.  Sex differences in left ventricular electrical dyssynchrony and outcomes with cardiac resynchronization therapy.

Authors:  Daniel J Friedman; Kasper Emerek; Peter L Sørensen; Emily P Zeitler; Sarah A Goldstein; Sana M Al-Khatib; Peter Søgaard; Claus Graff; Brett D Atwater
Journal:  Heart Rhythm O2       Date:  2020-08-04

9.  A computational investigation into rate-dependant vectorcardiogram changes due to specific fibrosis patterns in non-ischæmic dilated cardiomyopathy.

Authors:  Philip M Gemmell; Karli Gillette; Gabriel Balaban; Ronak Rajani; Edward J Vigmond; Gernot Plank; Martin J Bishop
Journal:  Comput Biol Med       Date:  2020-07-04       Impact factor: 4.589

10.  Left Ventricular Lead Placement Guided by Reduction in QRS Area.

Authors:  Mohammed Ali Ghossein; Francesco Zanon; Floor Salden; Antonius van Stipdonk; Lina Marcantoni; Elien Engels; Justin Luermans; Sjoerd Westra; Frits Prinzen; Kevin Vernooy
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2021-12-17       Impact factor: 4.241

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.