| Literature DB >> 29453440 |
Zhaoan Sun1, Qing Chen1, Xiao Han1, Roland Bol2, Bo Qu1, Fanqiao Meng3.
Abstract
Understanding the rhizodeposited carbon (C) dynamics of winterEntities:
Year: 2018 PMID: 29453440 PMCID: PMC5816614 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-018-21547-y
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sci Rep ISSN: 2045-2322 Impact factor: 4.379
Partitioning (%) of pulse-labelled carbon (C) (mean ± SE) at different growth stages of wheat and barley.
| Plant age (days) | Growth stage | Shoots | Roots | Soil | Soil/(soil + roots) | References | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wheat | 42 | Tillering | 70.9 | 17.6 | 11.5 | 39.6 | Keith |
| Wheat | 50 | 79.3 | 20.2 | 0.5 | 2.3 | Gregory and Atwell[ | |
| Wheat | 43 | 54.2 | 26.8 | 19.0 | 41.5 | Palta and Gregory[ | |
| Wheat | 49 | 80.8 | 19.2 | Martin and Kemp[ | |||
| Wheat | 166 | 54.2 | 23.7 | 22.1 | 48.2 | Swinnen | |
| Wheat | 37 | 53.7 | 43.0 | 3.2 | 6.9 | Lodhi | |
| Barley | 49 | 60.6 | 37.0 | 2.4 | 6.1 | Gregory and Atwell[ | |
| Barley | 34 | 78.0 | 13.8 | 8.2 | 37.3 | Jensen[ | |
| Barley | 47 | 56.5 | 33.7 | 9.8 | 22.5 | Swinnen | |
| Averagea | 63.4 ± 3.6 | 27.0 ± 3.4 | 9.6 ± 2.6 | 25.5 ± 6.1 | |||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| Wheat | 77 | Elongation | 81.2 | 11.8 | 7.0 | 37.1 | Keith |
| Wheat | 71 | 75.2 | 23.4 | 1.5 | 5.9 | Gregory and Atwell[ | |
| Wheat | 51 | 53.7 | 27.4 | 18.9 | 40.9 | Palta and Gregory[ | |
| Wheat | 151 | 71.4 | 17.7 | 10.9 | 38.2 | Swinnen | |
| Wheat | 193 | 91.3 | 6.7 | 1.9 | 22.2 | Swinnen | |
| Wheat | 211 | 66.0 | 22.5 | 11.5 | 33.9 | Qi and Wang[ | |
| Wheat | 50 | 53.7 | 43.0 | 3.2 | 6.9 | Atwell | |
| Barley | 67 | 82.4 | 13.5 | 4.1 | 23.4 | Swinnen | |
| Barley | 70 | 89.2 | 9.9 | 0.9 | 8.7 | Gregory and Atwell[ | |
| Barley | 66 | 69.1 | 8.3 | 22.6 | 73.1 | Jensen[ | |
| Barley | 56 | 74.3 | 7.8 | 17.8 | 69.4 | Jensen[ | |
| Barley | 25 | 62.3 | 15.3 | 22.4 | 59.3 | Zagel[ | |
| Average | 74.6 ± 3.2 | 15.4 ± 2.0 | 10.0 ± 2.5 | 34.7 ± 6.8 | |||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| Wheat | 133 | Anthesis | 97.0 | 1.1 | 1.8 | 62.1 | Keith |
| Wheat | 106 | 94.2 | 5.7 | 0.1 | 1.8 | Gregory and Atwell[ | |
| Wheat | 179 | 85.3 | 5.3 | 9.4 | 63.9 | Swinnen | |
| Wheat | 60 | 79.0 | 16.0 | 5.0 | 23.8 | Martin and Kemp[ | |
| Wheat | 226 | 96.5 | 3.3 | 0.2 | 5.9 | Qi and Wang[ | |
| Wheat | 70 | 84.1 | 14.7 | 1.3 | 8.2 | Atwell | |
| Barley | 101 | 93.1 | 1.0 | 5.9 | 85.3 | Jensen[ | |
| Barley | 86 | 86.1 | 4.6 | 9.3 | 66.9 | Jensen[ | |
| Barley | 40 | 66.4 | 9.5 | 24.1 | 71.8 | Zagel[ | |
| Barley | 105 | 82.3 | 1.8 | 15.9 | 89.7 | Gregory and Atwell[ | |
| Average | 86.4 ± 3.0 | 6.3 ± 1.7 | 7.3 ± 2.5 | 47.9 ± 10.8 | |||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| Wheat | 154 | Grain-filling | 98.9 | 0.4 | 0.7 | 63.6 | Keith |
| Wheat | 120 | 94.2 | 5.6 | 0.2 | 3.6 | Gregory and Atwell[ | |
| Wheat | 207 | 90.9 | 2.1 | 7.0 | 77.1 | Swinnen | |
| Wheat | 255 | 95.4 | 2.5 | 2.1 | 45.5 | Swinnen | |
| Wheat | 239 | 86.7 | 2.0 | 11.3 | 84.8 | Qi and Wang[ | |
| Wheat | 86 | 94.7 | 4.7 | 0.7 | 13.1 | Atwell | |
| Barley | 115 | 97.9 | 1.1 | 1.0 | 47.6 | Swinnen | |
| Barley | 126 | 97.4 | 2.3 | 0.2 | 8.0 | Gregory and Atwell[ | |
| Barley | 124 | 98.1 | 0.7 | 1.1 | 61.1 | Jensen[ | |
| Barley | 105 | 88.1 | 1.9 | 9.9 | 83.6 | Jensen[ | |
| Barley | 55 | 72.6 | 6.4 | 21.0 | 76.5 | Zagel[ | |
| Average | 92.3 ± 2.3 | 2.7 ± 0.6 | 5.0 ± 2.0 | 51.3 ± 9.2 | |||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| Wheat | 28 DALb | Whole growth period | 73.5 | 22.0 | 4.4 | 16.8 | Chowdhury |
| Wheat | 80–90 | 89.0 | 2.3 | 8.4 | 78.1 | Martens | |
| Wheat | 141 | 66.3 | 18.6 | 14.5 | 43.8 | Butterly | |
| Average | 76.5 ± 2.3 | 14.4 ± 2.3 | 9.1 ± 2.3 | 46.1 ± 2.3 | |||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
aData excludes that of Martin and Kemp[41]. bDAL, days after 14C pulse labelling.
Figure 1Biomass C of (a) shoots, (b) roots, (c) whole plants, and (d) the root/shoot and shoot/whole plant ratios as well as (e) winter wheat growth rates at different growth stages. Vertical bars represent the standard errors of the means (n = 3). Letters (a–c) indicate significant differences (p < 0.05, LSD) for comparison among different stages.
Figure 2Turnover of specific 14C activity for shoot, root and soil components at different DAL at the (a) tillering, (b) elongation, (c) anthesis and (d) grain-filling stages of winter wheat. Vertical bars represent the standard errors of the means (n = 3). LSD values (p < 0.05) are presented as whisked segments for comparison among different components at the same stage.
Figure 3Recovered 14C in shoot, root and soil components at different DAL at the (a) tillering, (b) elongation, (c) anthesis and (d) grain-filling stages of winter wheat. Vertical bars represent the standard errors of the means (n = 3).
Figure 4Proportion of 14C allocated at DAL 5/2 and at the end of the growing season (harvest) for (a) shoots, (b) roots, (c) soil, and (d) respiration at harvest for the different labelling events. Vertical bars represent the standard errors of the means (n = 3). Letters (a–c) indicate significant differences (p < 0.05, LSD) for comparison among different stages. Asterisks (*) denote significant differences (p < 0.05, t-test) between DAL 2/5 and harvest.
Figure 5Total carbon distribution in the wheat-soil pot system.
Amount of carbon (C) translocated belowground (mean ± SE) for wheat and barley quantified by C pulse labelling methods.
| Plant age | Roots | Soil | Roots + soil | References | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wheat | 167 | 327 | 16 | 343 | Gregory and Atwell[ |
| Wheat | 63 | 231 | 560 | 791 | Martin and Merckx[ |
| Wheat | 288 | 350 | 730 | 1080 | Swinnen |
| Wheat | 239 | 840 | 526 | 1366 | Qi and Wang[ |
| Barley | 167 | 324 | 24 | 348 | Gregory and Atwell[ |
| Barley | 127 | 449 | 818 | 1267 | Jensen[ |
| Barley | 148 | 430 | 880 | 1310 | Swinnen |
| Barley | 95 | 264 | 1171 | 1435 | Jensen[ |
| Average | 402 ± 68 | 591 ± 143 | 992 ± 158 | ||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|