| Literature DB >> 29453418 |
Gregory Costain1, Rebekah Jobling1,2, Susan Walker3,4, Miriam S Reuter3,4, Meaghan Snell1, Sarah Bowdin1,5,6, Ronald D Cohn1,4,5,6, Lucie Dupuis1, Stacy Hewson1, Saadet Mercimek-Andrews1,4,6, Cheryl Shuman1,7, Neal Sondheimer1,4,6, Rosanna Weksberg1,4,6, Grace Yoon1,6,8, M Stephen Meyn1,5,6,7, Dimitri J Stavropoulos2,9, Stephen W Scherer3,4,5,7, Roberto Mendoza-Londono1,5,6, Christian R Marshall10,11,12,13.
Abstract
Whole-genome sequencing (WGS) as a first-tier diagnostic test could transform medical genetic assessments, but there are limited data regarding its clinical use. We previously showed that WGS could feasibly be deployed as a single molecular test capable of a higher diagnostic rate than current practices, in a prospectively recruited cohort of 100 children meeting criteria for chromosomal microarray analysis. In this study, we report on the added diagnostic yield with re-annotation and reanalysis of these WGS data ~2 years later. Explanatory variants have been discovered in seven (10.9%) of 64 previously undiagnosed cases, in emerging disease genes like HMGA2. No new genetic diagnoses were made by any other method in the interval period as part of ongoing clinical care. The results increase the cumulative diagnostic yield of WGS in the study cohort to 41%. This represents a greater than 5-fold increase over the chromosomal microarrays, and a greater than 3-fold increase over all the clinical genetic testing ordered in practice. These findings highlight periodic reanalysis as yet another advantage of genomic sequencing in heterogeneous disorders. We recommend reanalysis of an individual's genome-wide sequencing data every 1-2 years until diagnosis, or sooner if their phenotype evolves.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2018 PMID: 29453418 PMCID: PMC5945683 DOI: 10.1038/s41431-018-0114-6
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Eur J Hum Genet ISSN: 1018-4813 Impact factor: 4.246