Literature DB >> 29453324

Incidence and Predictors of Perioperative Complications With Transvenous Lead Extractions: Real-World Experience With National Cardiovascular Data Registry.

Nitesh Sood1, David T Martin2, Rachel Lampert2, Jeptha P Curtis2, Craig Parzynski2, Jude Clancy2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Transvenous lead extraction is an integral part of management of patients with cardiovascular implantable electronic devices. Real-world incidence and predictors of perioperative complications in extractions involving implantable cardioverter-defibrillator leads have not been described in detail. METHODS AND
RESULTS: Data from the National Cardiovascular Data Registry Implantable Cardioverter-Defibrillator Registry were analyzed. Lead extraction was defined as removal of leads implanted for >1 year. Predictors of major perioperative complications for all extraction procedures (11 304) and for high-voltage lead (8362, 74%), across 762 centers, were analyzed using univariate and multivariate logistic regression. Major complication occurred in 258 (2.3%) extraction procedures. Of these 258 with a complication, 41 (16%) required urgent cardiac surgery. Of these 41, 14 (34%) died during surgery. Among the total 98 (0.9%) deaths reported, 18 (0.16% of total) occurred during transvenous lead extraction. In multivariable logistic regression analysis, female sex, admission other than electively for procedure, ≥3 leads extracted, longer implant duration, dislodgement of other leads, and patient's clinical status requiring lead extraction (infection/perforation) were associated with increased risk of complications. Smaller lead diameter, flat versus round coil shape, and greater proximal surface coil area were multivariate predictors of major perioperative complications specific to high-voltage leads.
CONCLUSIONS: The rate of major complications and mortality with transvenous lead extraction is similar in the real-world outcomes to that reported in recent single-center studies from high-volume centers. There is significant risk of urgent cardiac surgery, which carries a high mortality, and planning for appropriate cardiothoracic surgery backup is imperative.
© 2018 American Heart Association, Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  electrophysiology; incidence; lead; logistic models; registry

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29453324     DOI: 10.1161/CIRCEP.116.004768

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol        ISSN: 1941-3084


  25 in total

Review 1.  Transvenous Lead Extractions: Current Approaches and Future Trends.

Authors:  Adryan A Perez; Frank W Woo; Darren C Tsang; Roger G Carrillo
Journal:  Arrhythm Electrophysiol Rev       Date:  2018-08

Review 2.  Subcutaneous Versus Transvenous Implantable Defibrillator Therapy: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Trials and Propensity Score-Matched Studies.

Authors:  Khi Yung Fong; Colin Jun Rong Ng; Yue Wang; Colin Yeo; Vern Hsen Tan
Journal:  J Am Heart Assoc       Date:  2022-06-03       Impact factor: 6.106

Review 3.  State-of-the-art narrative review: multimodality imaging in electrophysiology and cardiac device therapies.

Authors:  Balint Laczay; Divyang Patel; Richard Grimm; Bo Xu
Journal:  Cardiovasc Diagn Ther       Date:  2021-06

4.  CRT implantation after transvenous lead/device extraction (TLE) in a patient with COVID-19: Endocarditis triggered by syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-COV-2) infection? A case report.

Authors:  Stefano De Vivo; Massimiliano Barberio; Carmelina Corrado; Sergio Severino; Raffaele Verde; Fiorentino Fragranza; Emilio Attena; Carolina Rescigno; Mariano Bernardo; Sara Innocenti; Carlo Tascini; Antonio D'Onofrio
Journal:  Pacing Clin Electrophysiol       Date:  2022-04-29       Impact factor: 1.912

5.  Early Versus Delayed Lead Extraction in Patients With Infected Cardiovascular Implantable Electronic Devices.

Authors:  Andrew Y Lin; Tatiana Saul; Omar M Aldaas; Florentino Lupercio; Gordon Ho; Travis Pollema; Victor Pretorius; Ulrika Birgersdotter-Green
Journal:  JACC Clin Electrophysiol       Date:  2020-12-24

6.  Pacemaker system replacement under local anesthesia allowing MRI access 7 years after the initial surgery: Two case reports.

Authors:  Yasuyuki Shimada; Hiroyoshi Sekii; Takeshi Enmoto; Yasushi Terada
Journal:  J Rural Med       Date:  2018-11-29

7.  Stenotrophomonas maltophilia Endocarditis of an Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillator Lead.

Authors:  Mohan Satish; Muhammad Adil Mumtaz; Marvin J Bittner; Carrie Valenta
Journal:  Cureus       Date:  2019-03-01

8.  Effectiveness and safety of transvenous extraction of single- versus dual-coil implantable cardioverter-defibrillator leads at single-center experience.

Authors:  Andrzej Ząbek; Krzysztof Boczar; Maciej Dębski; Mateusz Ulman; Roman Pfitzner; Robert Musiał; Jacek Lelakowski; Barbara Małecka
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2019-07       Impact factor: 1.817

9.  Transvenous Lead Extraction SAFeTY Score for Risk Stratification and Proper Patient Selection for Removal Procedures Using Mechanical Tools.

Authors:  Wojciech Jacheć; Anna Polewczyk; Maciej Polewczyk; Andrzej Tomasik; Andrzej Kutarski
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2020-01-28       Impact factor: 4.241

10.  Lead extraction complicated by right ventricular pseudoaneurysm: Percutaneous closure with septal occluder device.

Authors:  Matthew J Singleton; Ryan Brunetti; Mark H Schoenfeld; Prashant D Bhave; David X Zhao; S Patrick Whalen
Journal:  HeartRhythm Case Rep       Date:  2019-08-22
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.