Literature DB >> 29453291

LSD1 inhibition exerts its antileukemic effect by recommissioning PU.1- and C/EBPα-dependent enhancers in AML.

Monica Cusan1,2, Sheng F Cai1, Helai P Mohammad3, Andrei Krivtsov1,4, Alan Chramiec1, Evangelia Loizou1, Matthew D Witkin1, Kimberly N Smitheman3, Daniel G Tenen5, Min Ye5, Britta Will6, Ulrich Steidl6, Ryan G Kruger3, Ross L Levine1, Hugh Y Rienhoff7, Richard P Koche1, Scott A Armstrong1,4.   

Abstract

Epigenetic regulators are recurrently mutated and aberrantly expressed in acute myeloid leukemia (AML). Targeted therapies designed to inhibit these chromatin-modifying enzymes, such as the histone demethylase lysine-specific demethylase 1 (LSD1) and the histone methyltransferase DOT1L, have been developed as novel treatment modalities for these often refractory diseases. A common feature of many of these targeted agents is their ability to induce myeloid differentiation, suggesting that multiple paths toward a myeloid gene expression program can be engaged to relieve the differentiation blockade that is uniformly seen in AML. We performed a comparative assessment of chromatin dynamics during the treatment of mixed lineage leukemia (MLL)-AF9-driven murine leukemias and MLL-rearranged patient-derived xenografts using 2 distinct but effective differentiation-inducing targeted epigenetic therapies, the LSD1 inhibitor GSK-LSD1 and the DOT1L inhibitor EPZ4777. Intriguingly, GSK-LSD1 treatment caused global gains in chromatin accessibility, whereas treatment with EPZ4777 caused global losses in accessibility. We captured PU.1 and C/EBPα motif signatures at LSD1 inhibitor-induced dynamic sites and chromatin immunoprecipitation coupled with high-throughput sequencing revealed co-occupancy of these myeloid transcription factors at these sites. Functionally, we confirmed that diminished expression of PU.1 or genetic deletion of C/EBPα in MLL-AF9 cells generates resistance of these leukemias to LSD1 inhibition. These findings reveal that pharmacologic inhibition of LSD1 represents a unique path to overcome the differentiation block in AML for therapeutic benefit.
© 2018 by The American Society of Hematology.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29453291      PMCID: PMC5897868          DOI: 10.1182/blood-2017-09-807024

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Blood        ISSN: 0006-4971            Impact factor:   22.113


  38 in total

1.  A DNA Hypomethylation Signature Predicts Antitumor Activity of LSD1 Inhibitors in SCLC.

Authors:  Helai P Mohammad; Kimberly N Smitheman; Chandrashekhar D Kamat; David Soong; Kelly E Federowicz; Glenn S Van Aller; Jess L Schneck; Jeffrey D Carson; Yan Liu; Michael Butticello; William G Bonnette; Shelby A Gorman; Yan Degenhardt; Yuchen Bai; Michael T McCabe; Melissa B Pappalardi; Jiri Kasparec; Xinrong Tian; Kenneth C McNulty; Meagan Rouse; Patrick McDevitt; Thau Ho; Michelle Crouthamel; Timothy K Hart; Nestor O Concha; Charles F McHugh; William H Miller; Dashyant Dhanak; Peter J Tummino; Christopher L Carpenter; Neil W Johnson; Christine L Hann; Ryan G Kruger
Journal:  Cancer Cell       Date:  2015-07-13       Impact factor: 31.743

2.  A Novel LSD1 Inhibitor T-3775440 Disrupts GFI1B-Containing Complex Leading to Transdifferentiation and Impaired Growth of AML Cells.

Authors:  Yoshinori Ishikawa; Kanae Gamo; Masato Yabuki; Shinji Takagi; Kosei Toyoshima; Kazuhide Nakayama; Akiko Nakayama; Megumi Morimoto; Hitoshi Miyashita; Ryo Dairiki; Yukiko Hikichi; Naoki Tomita; Daisuke Tomita; Shinichi Imamura; Misa Iwatani; Yusuke Kamada; Satoru Matsumoto; Ryujiro Hara; Toshiyuki Nomura; Ken Tsuchida; Kazuhide Nakamura
Journal:  Mol Cancer Ther       Date:  2016-11-30       Impact factor: 6.261

3.  Reversible LSD1 inhibition interferes with global EWS/ETS transcriptional activity and impedes Ewing sarcoma tumor growth.

Authors:  Savita Sankar; Emily R Theisen; Jared Bearss; Timothy Mulvihill; Laura M Hoffman; Venkataswamy Sorna; Mary C Beckerle; Sunil Sharma; Stephen L Lessnick
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2014-06-24       Impact factor: 12.531

4.  Acute myeloid leukemia induced by graded reduction of a lineage-specific transcription factor, PU.1.

Authors:  Frank Rosenbauer; Katharina Wagner; Jeffery L Kutok; Hiromi Iwasaki; Michelle M Le Beau; Yutaka Okuno; Koichi Akashi; Steven Fiering; Daniel G Tenen
Journal:  Nat Genet       Date:  2004-05-16       Impact factor: 38.330

Review 5.  Drugging Chromatin in Cancer: Recent Advances and Novel Approaches.

Authors:  Sheng F Cai; Chun-Wei Chen; Scott A Armstrong
Journal:  Mol Cell       Date:  2015-11-19       Impact factor: 17.970

6.  Over-expression of LSD1 promotes proliferation, migration and invasion in non-small cell lung cancer.

Authors:  Tangfeng Lv; Dongmei Yuan; Xiaohui Miao; Yanling Lv; Ping Zhan; Xiaokun Shen; Yong Song
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-04-06       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Sensitivity of MLL-rearranged AML cells to all-trans retinoic acid is associated with the level of H3K4me2 in the RARα promoter region.

Authors:  K Sakamoto; T Imamura; M Yano; H Yoshida; A Fujiki; Y Hirashima; H Hosoi
Journal:  Blood Cancer J       Date:  2014-04-25       Impact factor: 11.037

8.  Identification of JL1037 as a novel, specific, reversible lysine-specific demethylase 1 inhibitor that induce apoptosis and autophagy of AML cells.

Authors:  Shuang Liu; Wenting Lu; Shouyun Li; Saisai Li; Jia Liu; Yuanyuan Xing; Shuzu Zhang; Joe Zhongxiang Zhou; Haiyan Xing; Yingxi Xu; Qing Rao; Chengjun Deng; Min Wang; Jianxiang Wang
Journal:  Oncotarget       Date:  2017-05-09

9.  Enhancer decommissioning by LSD1 during embryonic stem cell differentiation.

Authors:  Warren A Whyte; Steve Bilodeau; David A Orlando; Heather A Hoke; Garrett M Frampton; Charles T Foster; Shaun M Cowley; Richard A Young
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2012-02-01       Impact factor: 49.962

10.  Initiation of MLL-rearranged AML is dependent on C/EBPα.

Authors:  Ewa Ohlsson; Marie Sigurd Hasemann; Anton Willer; Felicia Kathrine Bratt Lauridsen; Nicolas Rapin; Johan Jendholm; Bo Torben Porse
Journal:  J Exp Med       Date:  2013-12-23       Impact factor: 14.307

View more
  36 in total

1.  Pharmacologic inhibition of lysine-specific demethylase 1 as a therapeutic and immune-sensitization strategy in pediatric high-grade glioma.

Authors:  Cavan P Bailey; Mary Figueroa; Achintyan Gangadharan; Yanwen Yang; Megan M Romero; Bridget A Kennis; Sridevi Yadavilli; Verlene Henry; Tiara Collier; Michelle Monje; Dean A Lee; Linghua Wang; Javad Nazarian; Vidya Gopalakrishnan; Wafik Zaky; Oren J Becher; Joya Chandra
Journal:  Neuro Oncol       Date:  2020-09-29       Impact factor: 12.300

2.  The Histone Demethylase LSD1 Regulates B Cell Proliferation and Plasmablast Differentiation.

Authors:  Robert R Haines; Benjamin G Barwick; Christopher D Scharer; Parimal Majumder; Troy D Randall; Jeremy M Boss
Journal:  J Immunol       Date:  2018-09-19       Impact factor: 5.422

3.  LSD1 inhibition by tranylcypromine derivatives interferes with GFI1-mediated repression of PU.1 target genes and induces differentiation in AML.

Authors:  Jessica Barth; Khalil Abou-El-Ardat; Denis Dalic; Nina Kurrle; Anna-Maria Maier; Sebastian Mohr; Judith Schütte; Lothar Vassen; Gabriele Greve; Johannes Schulz-Fincke; Martin Schmitt; Milica Tosic; Eric Metzger; Gesine Bug; Cyrus Khandanpour; Sebastian A Wagner; Michael Lübbert; Manfred Jung; Hubert Serve; Roland Schüle; Tobias Berg
Journal:  Leukemia       Date:  2019-01-24       Impact factor: 11.528

4.  Nascent transcript and single-cell RNA-seq analysis defines the mechanism of action of the LSD1 inhibitor INCB059872 in myeloid leukemia.

Authors:  Gretchen Johnston; Haley E Ramsey; Qi Liu; Jing Wang; Kristy R Stengel; Shilpa Sampathi; Pankaj Acharya; Maria Arrate; Matthew C Stubbs; Timothy Burn; Michael R Savona; Scott W Hiebert
Journal:  Gene       Date:  2020-05-15       Impact factor: 3.688

5.  What potential is there for LSD1 inhibitors to reach approval for AML?

Authors:  Manu R Pandey; Eunice S Wang
Journal:  Expert Opin Emerg Drugs       Date:  2019-12       Impact factor: 4.191

6.  LSD1 Cooperates with Noncanonical NF-κB Signaling to Regulate Marginal Zone B Cell Development.

Authors:  Robert R Haines; Christopher D Scharer; Jenna L Lobby; Jeremy M Boss
Journal:  J Immunol       Date:  2019-09-06       Impact factor: 5.422

7.  Superior efficacy of co-targeting GFI1/KDM1A and BRD4 against AML and post-MPN secondary AML cells.

Authors:  Warren Fiskus; Christopher P Mill; Behnam Nabet; Dimuthu Perera; Christine Birdwell; Taghi Manshouri; Bernardo Lara; Tapan M Kadia; Courtney DiNardo; Koichi Takahashi; Naval Daver; Prithviraj Bose; Lucia Masarova; Naveen Pemmaraju; Steven Kornblau; Gautam Borthakur; Guillermo Montalban-Bravo; Guillermo Garcia Manero; Sunil Sharma; Matthew Stubbs; Xiaoping Su; Michael R Green; Cristian Coarfa; Srdan Verstovsek; Joseph D Khoury; Christopher R Vakoc; Kapil N Bhalla
Journal:  Blood Cancer J       Date:  2021-05-20       Impact factor: 9.812

8.  LSD1-mediated repression of GFI1 super-enhancer plays an essential role in erythroleukemia.

Authors:  Goichi Tatsumi; Masahiro Kawahara; Ryusuke Yamamoto; Masakatsu Hishizawa; Katsuyuki Kito; Takayoshi Suzuki; Akifumi Takaori-Kondo; Akira Andoh
Journal:  Leukemia       Date:  2019-11-01       Impact factor: 11.528

Review 9.  Dysregulated haematopoietic stem cell behaviour in myeloid leukaemogenesis.

Authors:  Masayuki Yamashita; Paul V Dellorusso; Oakley C Olson; Emmanuelle Passegué
Journal:  Nat Rev Cancer       Date:  2020-05-15       Impact factor: 60.716

10.  microRNA-362-3p targets USP22 to retard retinoblastoma growth via reducing deubiquitination of LSD1.

Authors:  Junbo Rong; Zhigang Li; Limin Xu; Lijuan Lang; Guangying Zheng
Journal:  Cell Cycle       Date:  2021-01-21       Impact factor: 4.534

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.