| Literature DB >> 29452848 |
Shuang Yang1, Mingzhu Zheng2, Yong Cao1, Yanjiao Dong2, Sanabil Yaqoob2, Jingsheng Liu3.
Abstract
Cordyceps militaris 202 is a potential fungus for biotransformation zein, due to its various proteases, high tolerance and viability in nature. In this article, single factor experiment and response surface methodology were applied to optimize the liquid fermentation conditions and improve the ability of biotransformation zein. The optimized fermentation conditions were as follows: inoculum concentration of 19%, volume of liquor of 130mL/500mL and pH of 4.7. Under this condition, the degree of hydrolysis (DH) was 27.31%. The zein hydrolysates from fungi fermentation maintained a high thermal stability. Compared to the original zein, the zein hydrolysates were found to have high solubility, which most likely results in improved foaming and emulsifying properties. Overall, this research demonstrates that hydrolysis of zein by C. militaris 202 is a potential method for improving the functional properties of zein, and the zein hydrolysates can be used as functional ingredients with an increased antioxidant effect in both food and non-food applications.Entities:
Keywords: Cordyceps militaris 202; Degree of hydrolysis; Functionality; Zein
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2018 PMID: 29452848 PMCID: PMC6066730 DOI: 10.1016/j.bjm.2017.12.005
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Braz J Microbiol ISSN: 1517-8382 Impact factor: 2.476
Independent variables and their levels used in the response surface design.
| Factors | Levels | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| −1 | 0 | 1 | |
| A | 10 | 15 | 20 |
| B | 120 | 140 | 160 |
| C | 4 | 6 | 8 |
A, inoculum concentration (%); B, volume of liquor (mL/500 mL); C, pH.
Fig. 1Single factor experiments of the effect of inoculum concentration (A), volume of liquor (B), pH (C) on the DH and biomass.
ANOVA for response surface quadratic model.
| Source | Sum of squares | df | Mean square | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Prob > | ||||||
| Model | 693.0657 | 9 | 77.0073 | 51.6 | <0.0001 | Significant |
| A | 4.969443 | 1 | 4.969443 | 3.329856 | 0.1108 | N.S. |
| B | 94.64816 | 1 | 94.64816 | 63.42054 | <0.0001 | |
| C | 75.97746 | 1 | 75.97746 | 50.90994 | 0.0002 | |
| AB | 13.8909 | 1 | 13.8909 | 9.307825 | 0.0186 | |
| AC | 11.5481 | 1 | 11.5481 | 7.737994 | 0.0272 | |
| BC | 45.37841 | 1 | 45.37841 | 30.40654 | 0.0009 | |
| A2 | 13.83777 | 1 | 13.83777 | 9.272223 | 0.0187 | |
| B2 | 318.0952 | 1 | 318.0952 | 213.1449 | <0.0001 | |
| C2 | 82.9266 | 1 | 82.9266 | 55.56632 | 0.0001 | |
| Residual | 10.44673 | 7 | 1.49239 | |||
| Lack of fit | 7.032887 | 3 | 2.344296 | 2.746813 | 0.1769 | Not significant |
| Pure error | 3.413841 | 4 | 0.85346 | |||
| Cor total | 703.5125 | 16 | ||||
N.S., no significant (p > 0.05); R2, correlation coefficient.
Significant (p < 0.05).
Significant (p < 0.01).
The experimental design and RSM results.
| The experiment number | A | B | C | DH (%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 25.71 |
| 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 26.52 |
| 3 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 9.05 |
| 4 | 1 | 0 | −1 | 23.69 |
| 5 | 0 | −1 | −1 | 22.52 |
| 6 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 11.34 |
| 7 | −1 | 1 | 0 | 11.71 |
| 8 | −1 | 0 | −1 | 20.49 |
| 9 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 14.7 |
| 10 | 0 | 1 | −1 | 9.05 |
| 11 | −1 | 0 | 1 | 18.3 |
| 12 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 25.8 |
| 13 | 1 | −1 | 0 | 22.09 |
| 14 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 24.01 |
| 15 | −1 | −1 | 0 | 15.01 |
| 16 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 25.68 |
| 17 | 0 | −1 | 1 | 9.05 |
Fig. 2RSM curve of the interactions between different factors. Interaction effect of inoculum concentration and volume of liquor on the DH (A), interaction effect of inoculum concentration and pH on the DH (B), interaction effect of volume of liquor and pH on the DH (C).
Fig. 3Degree of hydrolysis of zein hydrolysates at different fermentation time.
Solubility and thermal properties of zein and its hydrolysates.
| Time of fermentation (d) | Solubility (%) | Thermal properties | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Maximum (°C) | Area (J/g) | ||
| Zein | 1.84 ± 0.25a | 87.26 ± 9.08a | 135.433 ± 9.09d |
| 2 | 80.45 ± 0.78b | 102.76 ± 0.28c | 89.99 ± 7.82a |
| 4 | 81.74 ± 1.01b | 100.76 ± 0.44c | 96.60 ± 9.05a |
| 6 | 83.14 ± 0.51c | 107.13 ± 0.54d | 92.15 ± 8.68a |
| 8 | 86.18 ± 0.86d | 92.75 ± 1.05b | 90.46 ± 0.49a |
| 10 | 84.47 ± 1.38c | 92.26 ± 1.52b | 97.36 ± 4.87b |
| 12 | 84.21 ± 0.90c | 92.38 ± 0.12b | 107.57 ± 0.84c |
| 14 | 83.96 ± 0.73c | 93.65 ± 1.00b | 108.78 ± 0.56c |
Mean ± SD (n = 3) and different letters in one column are significantly different (p < 0.05).
Fig. 4Thermal properties of zein and its hydrolysates.
Fig. 5Foaming properties and foaming stability (A), and emulsifying activity and emulsifying stability (B) of zein and its hydrolysates.
Fig. 6DPPH radical scavenging activity (A), hydroxyl radical scavenging activity (B), Fe2+-chelating activity (C) and reducing power (D) of zein hydrolysates.