Literature DB >> 29452549

Characterizing Potentially Preventable Cancer- and Chronic Disease-Related Emergency Department Use in the Year After Treatment Initiation: A Regional Study.

Laura Panattoni1, Catherine Fedorenko1, Mikael Anne Greenwood-Hickman1, Karma Kreizenbeck1, Julia R Walker1, Renato Martins1, Keith D Eaton1, John W Rieke1, Ted Conklin1, Bruce Smith1, Gary Lyman1, Scott D Ramsey1.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: As new quality metrics and interventions for potentially preventable emergency department (ED) visits are implemented, we sought to compare methods for evaluating the prevalence and costs of potentially preventable ED visits that were related to cancer and chronic disease among a commercially insured oncology population in the year after treatment initiation.
METHODS: We linked SEER records in western Washington from 2011 to 2016 with claims from two commercial insurers. The study included patients who were diagnosed with a solid tumor and tracked ED utilization for 1 year after the start of chemotherapy or radiation. Cancer symptoms from the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services metric and a patient-reported outcome intervention were labeled potentially preventable (PpCancer). Prevention Quality Indicators of the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality were labeled potentially preventable-chronic disease (PpChronic). We reported the primary diagnosis, all diagnosis field coding (1 to 10), and 2016 adjusted reimbursements.
RESULTS: Of 5,853 eligible patients, 27% had at least one ED visit, which yielded 2,400 total visits. Using primary diagnosis coding, 49.8% of ED visits had a PpCancer diagnosis, whereas 3.2% had a PpChronic diagnosis. Considering all diagnosis fields, 45.0%, 9.4%, and 18.5% included a PpCancer only, a PpChronic only, and both a PpCancer and a PpChronic diagnosis, respectively. The median reimbursement per visit was $735 (interquartile ratio, $194 to $1,549).
CONCLUSION: The prevalence of potentially preventable ED visits was generally high, but varied depending on the diagnosis code fields and the group of codes considered. Future research is needed to understand the complex landscape of potentially preventable ED visits and measures to improve value in cancer care delivery.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29452549     DOI: 10.1200/JOP.2017.028191

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Oncol Pract        ISSN: 1554-7477            Impact factor:   3.840


  28 in total

1.  Characteristics of Emergency Department Visits and Select Predictors of Hospitalization for Adults With Newly Diagnosed Cancer in a Safety-Net Health System.

Authors:  Arthur S Hong; Navid Sadeghi; Valorie Harvey; Simon Craddock Lee; Ethan A Halm
Journal:  J Oncol Pract       Date:  2019-04-09       Impact factor: 3.840

Review 2.  The increasing value of eHealth in the delivery of patient-centred cancer care.

Authors:  Frank J Penedo; Laura B Oswald; Joshua P Kronenfeld; Sofia F Garcia; David Cella; Betina Yanez
Journal:  Lancet Oncol       Date:  2020-05       Impact factor: 41.316

3.  Symptom Assessment Solutions for In-Home Supportive Services and Diverse Older Adults: A Roadmap for Change.

Authors:  Donna H Odierna; Mary T Katen; Mariko A Feuz; Ryan D McMahan; Christine S Ritchie; Shireen McSpadden; Mark Burns; Aiesha M Volow; Rebecca L Sudore
Journal:  J Palliat Med       Date:  2018-05-31       Impact factor: 2.947

4.  Supporting In-Home Caregivers in Symptom Assessment of Frail Older Adults with Serious Illness: A Pilot Study.

Authors:  Sarah Nouri; Christine Ritchie; Pei Chen; Aiesha Volow; Brookelle Li; Ismael Tellez; Rebecca L Sudore
Journal:  J Palliat Med       Date:  2020-05-22       Impact factor: 2.947

5.  From metrics to practice: identifying preventable emergency department visits for patients with cancer.

Authors:  Mohana Roy; Brian Halbert; Scott Devlin; David Chiu; Ryan Graue; Jessica A Zerillo
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2020-11-07       Impact factor: 3.603

6.  Outcomes after emergency department use in patients with cancer receiving chemotherapy in Ontario, Canada: a population-based cohort study.

Authors:  Keerat Grewal; Monika K Krzyzanowska; Shelley McLeod; Bjug Borgundvaag; Clare L Atzema
Journal:  CMAJ Open       Date:  2020-08-12

7.  Clinical Utility and User Perceptions of a Digital System for Electronic Patient-Reported Symptom Monitoring During Routine Cancer Care: Findings From the PRO-TECT Trial.

Authors:  Ethan Basch; Angela M Stover; Deborah Schrag; Arlene Chung; Jennifer Jansen; Sydney Henson; Philip Carr; Brenda Ginos; Allison Deal; Patricia A Spears; Mattias Jonsson; Antonia V Bennett; Gita Mody; Gita Thanarajasingam; Lauren J Rogak; Bryce B Reeve; Claire Snyder; Lisa A Kottschade; Marjory Charlot; Anna Weiss; Deborah Bruner; Amylou C Dueck
Journal:  JCO Clin Cancer Inform       Date:  2020-10

8.  Building a Clinically Relevant Risk Model: Predicting Risk of a Potentially Preventable Acute Care Visit for Patients Starting Antineoplastic Treatment.

Authors:  Bobby Daly; Dmitriy Gorenshteyn; Kevin J Nicholas; Alice Zervoudakis; Stefania Sokolowski; Claire E Perry; Lior Gazit; Abigail Baldwin Medsker; Rori Salvaggio; Lynn Adams; Han Xiao; Yeneat O Chiu; Lauren L Katzen; Margarita Rozenshteyn; Diane L Reidy-Lagunes; Brett A Simon; Wendy Perchick; Isaac Wagner
Journal:  JCO Clin Cancer Inform       Date:  2020-03

9.  Prior Frequent Emergency Department Use as a Predictor of Emergency Department Visits After a New Cancer Diagnosis.

Authors:  Arthur S Hong; Danh Q Nguyen; Simon Craddock Lee; D Mark Courtney; John W Sweetenham; Navid Sadeghi; John V Cox; Hannah Fullington; Ethan A Halm
Journal:  JCO Oncol Pract       Date:  2021-05-26

10.  Out-of-Pocket Costs for Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitors and Patient Outcomes in EGFR- and ALK-Positive Advanced Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer.

Authors:  Bernardo H L Goulart; Joseph M Unger; Shasank Chennupati; Catherine R Fedorenko; Scott D Ramsey
Journal:  JCO Oncol Pract       Date:  2020-12-07
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.