Literature DB >> 29452460

Outcomes after surgical pulmonary embolectomy for acute submassive and massive pulmonary embolism: A single-center experience.

Chetan Pasrija1, Anthony Kronfli2, Michael Rouse2, Maxwell Raithel2, Gregory J Bittle2, Sheelagh Pousatis2, Mehrdad Ghoreishi2, James S Gammie2, Bartley P Griffith2, Pablo G Sanchez3, Zachary N Kon2.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: Ideal treatment strategies for submassive and massive pulmonary embolism remain unclear. Recent reports of surgical pulmonary embolectomy have demonstrated improved outcomes, but surgical technique and postoperative outcomes continue to be refined. The aim of this study is to describe in-hospital survival and right ventricular function after surgical pulmonary embolectomy for submassive and massive pulmonary embolism with excessive predicted mortality (≥5%).
METHODS: All patients undergoing surgical pulmonary embolectomy (2011-2015) were retrospectively reviewed. Patients with pulmonary embolism were stratified as submassive, massive without arrest, and massive with arrest. Submassive was defined as normotensive with right ventricular dysfunction. Massive was defined as prolonged hypotension due to the pulmonary embolism. Preoperative demographics, intraoperative variables, and postoperative outcomes were compared.
RESULTS: A total of 55 patients were identified: 28 as submassive, 18 as massive without arrest, and 9 as massive with arrest. All patients had a right ventricle/left ventricle ratio greater than 1.0. Right ventricular dysfunction decreased from moderate preoperatively to none before discharge (P < .001). In-hospital and 1-year survival were 93% and 91%, respectively, with 100% survival in the submassive group. No patients developed renal failure requiring hemodialysis at discharge or had a postoperative stroke.
CONCLUSIONS: In this single institution experience, surgical pulmonary embolectomy is a safe and effective therapy to treat patients with a submassive or massive pulmonary embolism. Although survival in this study is higher than previously reported for patients treated with medical therapy alone, a prospective trial comparing surgical therapy with medical therapy is necessary to further elucidate the role of surgical pulmonary embolectomy in the treatment of pulmonary embolism.
Copyright © 2017 The American Association for Thoracic Surgery. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  pulmonary embolectomy; pulmonary embolism; submassive and massive pulmonary embolism; surgical pulmonary embolectomy

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 29452460     DOI: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2017.10.139

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg        ISSN: 0022-5223            Impact factor:   5.209


  10 in total

1.  What's new in severe pulmonary embolism?

Authors:  Nadia Aissaoui; Stavros Konstantinides; Guy Meyer
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2018-06-15       Impact factor: 17.440

2.  Acute Massive and Submassive Pulmonary Embolism: Historical Considerations/Surgical Techniques of Pulmonary Embolectomy/Novel Applications in Donor Lungs with Pulmonary Emboli.

Authors:  Cody Russell; Suresh Keshavamurthy
Journal:  Int J Angiol       Date:  2022-09-23

3.  Massive Embolism: Knife versus PCI.

Authors:  Scarlett Tohme; Joshua S Newman; Christopher Gasparis; Frank Manetta
Journal:  Int J Angiol       Date:  2022-08-20

4.  Management of Massive Pulmonary Embolism.

Authors:  Eva Polaková; Josef Veselka
Journal:  Int J Angiol       Date:  2022-09-23

Review 5.  Risk Stratification in Patients with Acute Pulmonary Embolism: Current Evidence and Perspectives.

Authors:  Antonio Leidi; Stijn Bex; Marc Righini; Amandine Berner; Olivier Grosgurin; Christophe Marti
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2022-04-30       Impact factor: 4.964

Review 6.  Acute Management of High-Risk and Intermediate-Risk Pulmonary Embolism in Children: A Review.

Authors:  Catherine Ross; Riten Kumar; Marie-Claude Pelland-Marcotte; Shivani Mehta; Monica E Kleinman; Ravi R Thiagarajan; Muhammad B Ghbeis; Christina J VanderPluym; Kevin G Friedman; Diego Porras; Francis Fynn-Thompson; Samuel Z Goldhaber; Leonardo R Brandão
Journal:  Chest       Date:  2021-09-26       Impact factor: 9.410

7.  Catheter-based interventions versus medical and surgical approaches in acute pulmonary embolism.

Authors:  Rafael S Cires-Drouet; Khanjan Nagarsheth; David J Kaczorowski; Shahab Toursavadkohi; Kristopher Deatrick; Ronson J Madathil; Kevin M Jones; Steven Liskov; Jeffrey Fitch; Michelle Sayad; Chetan Pasrija; Minerva Mayorga-Carlin; Daniel Herr; John D Sorkin; Bartley Griffith; Brajesh K Lal; James S Gammie
Journal:  J Vasc Surg Venous Lymphat Disord       Date:  2021-05-07

Review 8.  Lifting the fog in intermediate-risk (submassive) PE: full dose, low dose, or no thrombolysis?

Authors:  Amyn Bhamani; Joanna Pepke-Zaba; Karen Sheares
Journal:  F1000Res       Date:  2019-03-25

Review 9.  An Update on the Management of Acute High-Risk Pulmonary Embolism.

Authors:  Romain Chopard; Julien Behr; Charles Vidoni; Fiona Ecarnot; Nicolas Meneveau
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2022-08-17       Impact factor: 4.964

10.  Clinical outcomes of acute pulmonary embolectomy as the first-line treatment for massive and submassive pulmonary embolism: a single-centre study in China.

Authors:  Wang QiMin; Chen LiangWan; Chen DaoZhong; Qiu HanFan; Huang ZhongYao; Dai XiaoFu; Huang XueShan; Lin Feng; Chen HuaBin
Journal:  J Cardiothorac Surg       Date:  2020-10-21       Impact factor: 1.637

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.