Kate Fennell1, Melissa Hull2, Martin Jones3, James Dollman4. 1. Sansom Institute for Health Research, University of South Australia kate.fennell@unisa.edu.au. 2. University of South Australia melissa.hull@mymail.unisa.edu.au. 3. Department of Rural Health, University of South Australia, Whyalla Norrie, SA 5608, Australia martin.jones@unisa.edu.au. 4. Sansom Institute for Health Research, University of South Australia, GPO Box 2471, Adelaide, SA 5001, Australia; Alliance for Research in Exercise, Nutrition and Activity, School of Health Sciences, University of South Australia, GPO Box 2471, Adelaide, SA 5001, Australia; and Department of Rural Health, University of South Australia, 111 Nicolson Avenue, Whyalla Norrie, SA 5608, Australia james.dollman@unisa.edu.au.
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: The prevalence of chronic disease, mortality and suicide rates is higher in rural Australia than in urban centres. Understanding rural Australians' barriers to accessing health services requires urgent attention. The purpose of this study was to compare barriers to help-seeking for physical and mental health issues among rural South Australian adults. METHODS: A total of 409 people from three rural and remote regions in South Australia completed a computer-assisted telephone interview. They were presented a physical or mental health scenario and rated the extent to which barriers would prevent them from seeking help for that condition. Responses ranged from 1 ('strongly disagree') to 5 ('strongly agree') and were averaged to form domain scores (higher scores representing stronger barriers to seeking support), in addition to being examined at the item level. RESULTS: Men reported higher barriers for the mental compared with physical health scenario across four domains ('need for control and self-reliance', 'minimising the problem, resignation and normalisation', 'privacy' and 'emotional control'). Women reported higher barriers for the mental compared to physical health scenario in two domains ('need for control and self-reliance' and 'privacy'). Both men and women endorsed many items in the mental health context (eg 'I don't like feeling controlled by other people', 'I wouldn't want to overreact to a problem that wasn't serious', 'Problems like this are part of life; they're just something you have to deal with', 'I'd prefer just to put up with it rather than dwell on my problems', 'Privacy is important to me, and I don't want other people to know about my problems' and 'I don't like to get emotional about things') but in the physical health context, barriers were endorsed only by men (eg 'I wouldn't want to overreact to a problem that wasn't serious',' I'd prefer just to put up with it rather than dwell on my problems', 'Problems like this are part of life; they're just something you have to deal with', 'I like to make my own decisions and not be too influenced by others'). CONCLUSIONS: Both rural men and rural women report more barriers to help seeking for mental health issues than physical health issues across a range of domains. There is a need to educate the current and future rural health and mental health workforce about these barriers and to encourage them to test evidence-based strategies to address them, in particular to facilitate more widespread mental health help-seeking in rural Australia.
INTRODUCTION: The prevalence of chronic disease, mortality and suicide rates is higher in rural Australia than in urban centres. Understanding rural Australians' barriers to accessing health services requires urgent attention. The purpose of this study was to compare barriers to help-seeking for physical and mental health issues among rural South Australian adults. METHODS: A total of 409 people from three rural and remote regions in South Australia completed a computer-assisted telephone interview. They were presented a physical or mental health scenario and rated the extent to which barriers would prevent them from seeking help for that condition. Responses ranged from 1 ('strongly disagree') to 5 ('strongly agree') and were averaged to form domain scores (higher scores representing stronger barriers to seeking support), in addition to being examined at the item level. RESULTS:Men reported higher barriers for the mental compared with physical health scenario across four domains ('need for control and self-reliance', 'minimising the problem, resignation and normalisation', 'privacy' and 'emotional control'). Women reported higher barriers for the mental compared to physical health scenario in two domains ('need for control and self-reliance' and 'privacy'). Both men and women endorsed many items in the mental health context (eg 'I don't like feeling controlled by other people', 'I wouldn't want to overreact to a problem that wasn't serious', 'Problems like this are part of life; they're just something you have to deal with', 'I'd prefer just to put up with it rather than dwell on my problems', 'Privacy is important to me, and I don't want other people to know about my problems' and 'I don't like to get emotional about things') but in the physical health context, barriers were endorsed only by men (eg 'I wouldn't want to overreact to a problem that wasn't serious',' I'd prefer just to put up with it rather than dwell on my problems', 'Problems like this are part of life; they're just something you have to deal with', 'I like to make my own decisions and not be too influenced by others'). CONCLUSIONS: Both rural men and rural women report more barriers to help seeking for mental health issues than physical health issues across a range of domains. There is a need to educate the current and future rural health and mental health workforce about these barriers and to encourage them to test evidence-based strategies to address them, in particular to facilitate more widespread mental health help-seeking in rural Australia.
Entities:
Keywords:
barrier; health; help-seeking; mental health; physical health; Australia
Authors: Vanessa Wan Sze Cheng; Sarah E Piper; Antonia Ottavio; Tracey A Davenport; Ian B Hickie Journal: J Med Internet Res Date: 2021-02-10 Impact factor: 5.428
Authors: Kate M Gunn; Gemma Skaczkowski; James Dollman; Andrew D Vincent; Camille E Short; Susan Brumby; Alison Barrett; Nathan Harrison; Deborah Turnbull Journal: JMIR Hum Factors Date: 2022-01-11
Authors: David Crompton; Jane Shakespeare-Finch; Gerard FitzGerald; Peter Kohleis; Ross Young Journal: Prehosp Disaster Med Date: 2022-10 Impact factor: 2.866
Authors: Melissa J Hull; Kate M Gunn; Ashleigh E Smith; Martin Jones; James Dollman Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2022-09-04 Impact factor: 4.614
Authors: Kate M Gunn; Ian Olver; Xiomara Skrabal Ross; Nathan Harrison; Patricia M Livingston; Carlene Wilson Journal: Cancers (Basel) Date: 2021-03-30 Impact factor: 6.639