| Literature DB >> 29451618 |
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to investigate the frequency of frailty and the association of vitamin D levels and the frailty phenotype among non-geriatric dialysis patients.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2018 PMID: 29451618 PMCID: PMC5773824 DOI: 10.6061/clinics/2018/e116
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Clinics (Sao Paulo) ISSN: 1807-5932 Impact factor: 2.365
Demographic Characteristics of the Patients.
| Patients (n=74) | |
|---|---|
| 50.91±10.14 | |
| 33 (45%) | |
| 41 (55%) | |
| 24.89±5.23 | |
| 64 (86%) | |
| 13 (18%) | |
| 2 (3%) | |
| 14 (19%) |
Descriptive statistics were used.
Clinical Parameters of the Patients.
| Patients (n=74) | |
|---|---|
| 9.9±7.2 | |
| 8.9±7.1 | |
| 5 (7%) | |
| 17 (27%) | |
| 23 (31%) | |
| 3 (4%) | |
| 11 (15%) | |
| 0 (0 %) | |
| 6.3±2.2 | |
| 4.04±0.41 | |
| 7.04±2.18 | |
| 5.2±1.02 | |
| 9.6±0.8 | |
| 5.5±1.54 | |
| 76±51 | |
| 13.93±8.64 | |
| 612.16±519.24 |
Frailty Phenotypes of the Patients.
| Patients (n=74) | |
|---|---|
| 32.66±24.2 | |
| 1.2±0.67 | |
| 793.15±832.95 | |
| 38 (51%) | |
| 28 (38%) | |
| 39 (53%) | |
| 13 (18%) | |
| 21 (28%) |
Correlation Coefficients of the Patients.
| Age | Sex | BMI | Disease duration | Dialysis duration | Frailty score | 25-hydroxy vitamin D | Hb | PTH | Albumin | Iron | Iron binding capacity | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0.059 | 0.174 | -0.224 | -0.217 | -0.244* | 0.147 | 0.159 | -0.063 | -0.287* | -0.048 | 0.156 | |
| 0.617 | 0.138 | 0.058 | 0.067 | 0.038 | 0.215 | 0.176 | 0.602 | 0.013 | 0.691 | 0.192 | ||
| 0.059 | 1 | -0.078 | -0.176 | -0.166 | -0.210 | -0.095 | 0.033 | 0.043 | 0.107 | -0.236* | 0.058 | |
| 0.617 | 0.511 | 0.140 | 0.164 | 0.075 | 0.423 | 0.781 | 0.720 | 0.366 | 0.046 | 0.626 | ||
| 0.174 | -0.078 | 1 | -0.100 | -0.108 | 0.117 | 0.121 | 0.195 | 0.090 | -0.171 | -0.387** | 0.282* | |
| 0.138 | 0.511 | 0.403 | 0.367 | 0.323 | 0.308 | 0.095 | 0.454 | 0.144 | 0.001 | 0.017 | ||
| -0.224 | -0.176 | -0.100 | 1 | 0.999** | 0.084 | 0.072 | -0.359** | 0.256* | 0.442** | 0.101 | 0.066 | |
| 0.058 | 0.140 | 0.403 | 0.000 | 0.488 | 0.548 | 0.002 | 0.034 | 0.000 | 0.406 | 0.588 | ||
| -0.217 | -0.166 | -0.108 | 0.999** | 1 | 0.078 | 0.076 | -0.349** | 0.247* | 0.436** | 0.094 | 0.070 | |
| 0.067 | 0.164 | 0.367 | 0.000 | 0.517 | 0.529 | 0.003 | 0.040 | 0.000 | 0.437 | 0.564 | ||
| -0.210 | 0.117 | 0.084 | 0.078 | 1 | 0.171 | 0.036 | 0.121 | |||||
| 0.075 | 0.323 | 0.488 | 0.517 | 0.154 | 0.763 | 0.313 | ||||||
| 0.147 | -0.095 | 0.121 | 0.072 | 0.076 | -0.122 | 1 | 0.052 | -0.033 | 0.009 | -0.017 | -0.068 | |
| 0.215 | 0.423 | 0.308 | 0.548 | 0.529 | 0.308 | 0.660 | 0.785 | 0.941 | 0.888 | 0.572 | ||
| 0.159 | 0.033 | 0.195 | -0.359** | -0.349** | -0.336** | 0.052 | 1 | -0.100 | -0.338** | -0.346** | 0.086 | |
| 0.176 | 0.781 | 0.095 | 0.002 | 0.003 | 0.004 | 0.660 | 0.409 | 0.003 | 0.003 | 0.471 | ||
| -0.063 | 0.043 | 0.090 | 0.256* | 0.247* | 0.171 | -0.033 | -0.100 | 1 | 0.344** | 0.173 | -0.137 | |
| 0.602 | 0.720 | 0.454 | 0.034 | 0.040 | 0.154 | 0.785 | 0.409 | 0.003 | 0.148 | 0.255 | ||
| -0.287* | 0.107 | -0.171 | 0.442** | 0.436** | 0.263* | 0.009 | -0.338** | 0.344** | 1 | 0.167 | 0.147 | |
| 0.013 | 0.366 | 0.144 | 0.000 | 0.000 | 0.025 | 0.941 | 0.003 | 0.003 | 0.160 | 0.218 | ||
| -0.048 | -0.236* | -0.387** | 0.101 | 0.094 | 0.036 | -0.017 | -0.346** | 0.173 | 0.167 | 1 | -0.370** | |
| 0.156 | 0.058 | 0.282* | 0.066 | 0.070 | 0.121 | -0.068 | 0.086 | -0.137 | 0.147 | -0.370** | 1 | |
| 0.192 | 0.626 | 0.017 | 0.588 | 0.564 | 0.313 | 0.572 | 0.471 | 0.255 | 0.218 | 0.001 |
PTH: Parathyroid hormone, Hb: Hemoglobin The Pearson correlation test was used for statistical analysis. A value of p < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.
Comparison of Clinical and Laboratory Characteristics of the Patients.
| Mean | Std. deviation | 95% confidence interval for mean | Minimum | Maximum | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lower bound | Upper bound | ||||||
| 52.61 | 10.28 | 48.62 | 56.59 | 29 | 64 | ||
| 54.50 | 5.89 | 48.32 | 60.68 | 48 | 61 | ||
| 49.03 | 10.49 | 45.63 | 52.43 | 30 | 65 | ||
| 24.06 | 5.40 | 21.96 | 26.1595 | .00 | 29.69 | ||
| 27.64 | 3.78 | 23.67 | 31.6111 | 22.04 | 30.86 | ||
| 25.22 | 5.19 | 23.53 | 26.9068 | 18.55 | 40.79 | ||
| 8.07 | 2.58 | 7.07 | 9.0796 | 3.69 | 12.32 | ||
| 5.92 | 1.39 | 4.46 | 7.3895 | 3.69 | 7.80 | ||
| 6.49 | 1.68 | 5.95 | 7.0474 | 1.94 | 9.38 | ||
| 17.09 | 11.70 | 12.46 | 21.722 | 7.8 | 68.9 | ||
| 13.45 | 4.67 | 8.54 | 18.351 | 6.5 | 21.1 | ||
| 11.58 | 5.58 | 9.77 | 13.391 | 3.5 | 26.6 | ||
| 554.67 | 499.73 | 352.82 | 756.519 | 7.1 | 2126.0 | ||
| 358.21 | 137.32 | 214.10 | 502.327 | 174.9 | 497.7 | ||
| 689.56 | 557.93 | 508.69 | 870.422 | 81.2 | 2126.0 | ||
| 3.91 | 0.44 | 3.74 | 4.085 | 2.9 | 4.5 | ||
| 4.03 | 0.35 | 3.66 | 4.401 | 3.4 | 4.4 | ||
| 4.14 | 0.38 | 4.02 | 4.274 | 3.4 | 5.3 | ||
| 72.27 | 29.41 | 60.39 | 84.15 | 42 | 138 | ||
| 64.33 | 40.77 | 21.55 | 107.12 | 33 | 141 | ||
| 72.82 | 30.99 | 62.77 | 82.87 | 28 | 152 | ||
ANOVA was used to evaluate comparisons.