Terrance A Sgroi1, John M Zajac2. 1. Hospital for Special Surgery, Sports Rehabilitation and Performance, 525 E 71st St., New York, NY, USA. Sgroit@hss.edu. 2. New York Mets Baseball Club, New York, NY, USA.
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Throwing places high demands on the human body, and specific characteristics are developed over time unique to these athletes. When returning to throw after injury, it is important to follow a criterion-based progression that allows the body to be prepared appropriately for the stresses that throwing will require. There is currently a void in the literature for criteria-based progression that helps these athletes return to the highest level of play. RECENT FINDINGS: As injury rates continue to rise in baseball, there is increased evidence showing contributions of the core and lower extremity to the baseball pitch. There is also additional data showing pitcher specific characteristics such as range of motion and scapular position in this unique population. The rehab professional should take into account every phase of the pitch starting from balance through ball release when designing a comprehensive return-to-throwing program. Returning an athlete back to a throwing sport can be an overwhelming task. The rehabilitation specialist must have a sound understanding of the throwing motion as well as any biomechanical implications on the body, contributions throughout the kinetic chain, range of motion, and strength characteristics specific to the thrower as well as proper tissue loading principles. It is important that these athletes are not progressed too quickly through their programs and that a criteria-based progression is followed. They should have normalized range of motion, strength, and scapular mechanics, followed by a sound plyometric progression. Once this is achieved, they are advanced to an interval throwing program with increasing distance, effort, and volume which should be tracked for workload, making sure they do not throw more than their body is prepared for.
PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Throwing places high demands on the human body, and specific characteristics are developed over time unique to these athletes. When returning to throw after injury, it is important to follow a criterion-based progression that allows the body to be prepared appropriately for the stresses that throwing will require. There is currently a void in the literature for criteria-based progression that helps these athletes return to the highest level of play. RECENT FINDINGS: As injury rates continue to rise in baseball, there is increased evidence showing contributions of the core and lower extremity to the baseball pitch. There is also additional data showing pitcher specific characteristics such as range of motion and scapular position in this unique population. The rehab professional should take into account every phase of the pitch starting from balance through ball release when designing a comprehensive return-to-throwing program. Returning an athlete back to a throwing sport can be an overwhelming task. The rehabilitation specialist must have a sound understanding of the throwing motion as well as any biomechanical implications on the body, contributions throughout the kinetic chain, range of motion, and strength characteristics specific to the thrower as well as proper tissue loading principles. It is important that these athletes are not progressed too quickly through their programs and that a criteria-based progression is followed. They should have normalized range of motion, strength, and scapular mechanics, followed by a sound plyometric progression. Once this is achieved, they are advanced to an interval throwing program with increasing distance, effort, and volume which should be tracked for workload, making sure they do not throw more than their body is prepared for.
Authors: Adam W Anz; Brandon D Bushnell; Leah Passmore Griffin; Thomas J Noonan; Michael R Torry; Richard J Hawkins Journal: Am J Sports Med Date: 2010-04-16 Impact factor: 6.202
Authors: Billy T Hulin; Tim J Gabbett; Peter Blanch; Paul Chapman; David Bailey; John W Orchard Journal: Br J Sports Med Date: 2013-08-20 Impact factor: 13.800
Authors: Robert A Keller; Matthew J Steffes; David Zhuo; Michael J Bey; Vasilios Moutzouros Journal: J Shoulder Elbow Surg Date: 2014-08-31 Impact factor: 3.019
Authors: Glenn S Fleisig; Becky Bolt; Dave Fortenbaugh; Kevin E Wilk; James R Andrews Journal: J Orthop Sports Phys Ther Date: 2011-01-05 Impact factor: 4.751
Authors: Nicholas A Trasolini; Kristen F Nicholson; Joseph Mylott; Garrett S Bullock; Tessa C Hulburt; Brian R Waterman Journal: Arthrosc Sports Med Rehabil Date: 2022-01-28
Authors: Austin G Wynn; Andrew P Collins; Elizabeth Nguyen; Eric Sales; Harrison Youmans; Daryl C Osbahr; Ibrahim Zeini; Michelle Henne Journal: Cureus Date: 2021-11-18