Literature DB >> 29450716

Could IVIM and ADC help in predicting the KRAS status in patients with rectal cancer?

Yanyan Xu1, Qiaoyu Xu1, Hongliang Sun2, Tongxi Liu1, Kaining Shi3, Wu Wang1.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To evaluate the diagnostic potential of DW-MRI relative parameters for differentiation of rectal cancers with different Kirsten rat sarcoma viral oncogene homologue (KRAS) mutation status.
METHODS: Fifty-one patients with rectal cancer underwent diffusion-weighted MR imaging with eight b values. ADCs (including Max-ADC, Min-ADC and Mean-ADC) and IVIM parameters (D, pure diffusion; f, perfusion fraction; D*, pseudodiffusion coefficient) were respectively calculated by mono- and bi-exponential analysis. Patients were stratified into two groups: KRAS wild type and mutant. The DW-MRI-derived parameters between the KRAS wild-type group and KRAS mutant group were compared using the Mann-Whitney U test. Receiver-operating characteristic (ROC) analysis of discrimination between KRAS wild-type and KRAS mutant rectal cancer was performed for the DW-MRI-derived parameters.
RESULTS: Max-ADC, Mean-ADC and D values were significantly lower in the KRAS mutant group than in the KRAS wild-type group, whereas a higher D* value was demonstrated in the KRAS mutant group. According to the ROC curve, Mean-ADC and D* values showed moderate diagnostic significance with the AUC values of 0.756 and 0.710, respectively. The cut-off values for Mean-ADC and D* were 1.43 × 10-3mm2/s and 26.58 × 10-3mm2/s, respectively.
CONCLUSION: Rectal cancers had distinctive diffusion/perfusion characteristics in different KRAS mutation statuses. The DW-MRI-derived parameters, specifically Mean-ADC and D*, show a moderate diagnostic significance for KRAS status. KEY POINTS: • Rectal cancers with different KRAS mutation statuses demonstrated distinctive diffusion/perfusion characteristics. • Max-ADC, Mean-ADC and D values were lower in the KRAS mutant group. • A higher D* value was demonstrated in the KRAS mutant group. • IVIM-DW MRI may potentially help preoperative KRAS mutant status prediction.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Diffusion; Magnetic resonance imaging; Mutation; Perfusion; Rectal cancer

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29450716     DOI: 10.1007/s00330-018-5329-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Radiol        ISSN: 0938-7994            Impact factor:   5.315


  27 in total

1.  Nasopharyngeal carcinoma: comparison of diffusion and perfusion characteristics between different tumour stages using intravoxel incoherent motion MR imaging.

Authors:  Vincent Lai; Xiao Li; Victor Ho Fun Lee; Ka On Lam; Daniel Yee Tak Fong; Bingsheng Huang; Queenie Chan; Pek Lan Khong
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2013-08-29       Impact factor: 5.315

2.  Apparent diffusion coefficient value as a biomarker reflecting morphological and biological features of prostate cancer.

Authors:  Hyeyeol Bae; Soichiro Yoshida; Yoh Matsuoka; Hiroshi Nakajima; Eisaku Ito; Hiroshi Tanaka; Miyako Oya; Takayuki Nakayama; Hideki Takeshita; Toshiki Kijima; Junichiro Ishioka; Noboru Numao; Fumitaka Koga; Kazutaka Saito; Takumi Akashi; Yasuhisa Fujii; Kazunori Kihara
Journal:  Int Urol Nephrol       Date:  2014-03       Impact factor: 2.370

3.  Intravoxel Incoherent Motion-derived Histogram Metrics for Assessment of Response after Combined Chemotherapy and Radiation Therapy in Rectal Cancer: Initial Experience and Comparison between Single-Section and Volumetric Analyses.

Authors:  Stephanie Nougaret; Hebert Alberto Vargas; Yulia Lakhman; Romain Sudre; Richard K G Do; Frederic Bibeau; David Azria; Eric Assenat; Nicolas Molinari; Marie-Ange Pierredon; Philippe Rouanet; Boris Guiu
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2016-02-26       Impact factor: 11.105

4.  Prognostic value of KRAS and BRAF mutations in curatively resected colorectal cancer.

Authors:  Shigenori Kadowaki; Miho Kakuta; Shuhei Takahashi; Akemi Takahashi; Yoshiko Arai; Yoji Nishimura; Toshimasa Yatsuoka; Akira Ooki; Kensei Yamaguchi; Keitaro Matsuo; Kei Muro; Kiwamu Akagi
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2015-01-28       Impact factor: 5.742

5.  Separation of diffusion and perfusion in intravoxel incoherent motion MR imaging.

Authors:  D Le Bihan; E Breton; D Lallemand; M L Aubin; J Vignaud; M Laval-Jeantet
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1988-08       Impact factor: 11.105

6.  Specific TP53 and/or Ki-ras mutations as independent predictors of clinical outcome in sporadic colorectal adenocarcinomas: results of a 5-year Gruppo Oncologico dell'Italia Meridionale (GOIM) prospective study.

Authors:  V Bazan; V Agnese; S Corsale; V Calò; M R Valerio; M A Latteri; S Vieni; N Grassi; G Cicero; G Dardanoni; R M Tomasino; G Colucci; N Gebbia; A Russo
Journal:  Ann Oncol       Date:  2005-05       Impact factor: 32.976

7.  Prognostic role of KRAS and BRAF in stage II and III resected colon cancer: results of the translational study on the PETACC-3, EORTC 40993, SAKK 60-00 trial.

Authors:  Arnaud D Roth; Sabine Tejpar; Mauro Delorenzi; Pu Yan; Roberto Fiocca; Dirk Klingbiel; Daniel Dietrich; Bart Biesmans; György Bodoky; Carlo Barone; Enrique Aranda; Bernard Nordlinger; Laura Cisar; Roberto Labianca; David Cunningham; Eric Van Cutsem; Fred Bosman
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2009-12-14       Impact factor: 44.544

8.  Mutations in APC, Kirsten-ras, and p53--alternative genetic pathways to colorectal cancer.

Authors:  Gillian Smith; Francis A Carey; Julie Beattie; Murray J V Wilkie; Tracy J Lightfoot; Jonathan Coxhead; R Colin Garner; Robert J C Steele; C Roland Wolf
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2002-07-01       Impact factor: 11.205

9.  Rectal cancer: Short-term reproducibility of intravoxel incoherent motion parameters in 3.0T magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  Hongliang Sun; Yanyan Xu; Qiaoyu Xu; Kaining Shi; Wu Wang
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2017-05       Impact factor: 1.889

10.  Apparent Diffusion Coefficient (ADC) value: a potential imaging biomarker that reflects the biological features of rectal cancer.

Authors:  Yiqun Sun; Tong Tong; Sanjun Cai; Rui Bi; Chao Xin; Yajia Gu
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-10-10       Impact factor: 3.240

View more
  14 in total

Review 1.  Diffusion-weighted imaging in rectal cancer: current applications and future perspectives.

Authors:  Niels W Schurink; Doenja M J Lambregts; Regina G H Beets-Tan
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2019-03-05       Impact factor: 3.039

Review 2.  Multiparametric MRI in rectal cancer.

Authors:  Bengi Gürses; Medine Böge; Emre Altınmakas; Emre Balık
Journal:  Diagn Interv Radiol       Date:  2019-05       Impact factor: 2.630

3.  Multi-parameter diffusion and perfusion magnetic resonance imaging and radiomics nomogram for preoperative evaluation of aquaporin-1 expression in rectal cancer.

Authors:  Yidi Chen; Basen Li; Zijian Jiang; Hui Li; Yiwu Dang; Cheng Tang; Yuwei Xia; Huiting Zhang; Bin Song; Liling Long
Journal:  Abdom Radiol (NY)       Date:  2022-02-15

4.  Development and validation of a MRI-based radiomics signature for prediction of KRAS mutation in rectal cancer.

Authors:  Yanfen Cui; Huanhuan Liu; Jialiang Ren; Xiaosong Du; Lei Xin; Dandan Li; Xiaotang Yang; Dengbin Wang
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2020-01-15       Impact factor: 5.315

5.  Association between oncogenic RAS mutation and radiologic-pathologic findings in patients with primary rectal cancer.

Authors:  Sung Jae Jo; Seung Ho Kim
Journal:  Quant Imaging Med Surg       Date:  2019-02

6.  Pretreatment Apparent Diffusion Coefficient Cannot Predict Histopathological Features and Response to Neoadjuvant Radiochemotherapy in Rectal Cancer: A Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Alexey Surov; Maciej Pech; Maciej Powerski; Katja Woidacki; Andreas Wienke
Journal:  Dig Dis       Date:  2021-03-04       Impact factor: 2.404

7.  Characterizing MRI features of rectal cancers with different KRAS status.

Authors:  Yanyan Xu; Qiaoyu Xu; Yanhui Ma; Jianghui Duan; Haibo Zhang; Tongxi Liu; Lu Li; Hongliang Sun; Kaining Shi; Sheng Xie; Wu Wang
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2019-11-14       Impact factor: 4.430

8.  Magnetic Resonance-Based Texture Analysis Differentiating KRAS Mutation Status in Rectal Cancer.

Authors:  Ji Eun Oh; Min Ju Kim; Joohyung Lee; Bo Yun Hur; Bun Kim; Dae Yong Kim; Ji Yeon Baek; Hee Jin Chang; Sung Chan Park; Jae Hwan Oh; Sun Ah Cho; Dae Kyung Sohn
Journal:  Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2019-05-07       Impact factor: 4.679

Review 9.  Emerging applications of radiomics in rectal cancer: State of the art and future perspectives.

Authors:  Min Hou; Ji-Hong Sun
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2021-07-07       Impact factor: 5.742

10.  Could intravoxel incoherent motion diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging be feasible and beneficial to the evaluation of gastrointestinal tumors histopathology and the therapeutic response?

Authors:  Hou-Dong Zuo; Xiao-Ming Zhang
Journal:  World J Radiol       Date:  2018-10-28
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.