Literature DB >> 29450636

Comparing the efficacy of low-dose vs high-dose cyclophosphamide regimen as induction therapy in the treatment of proliferative lupus nephritis: a single center study.

Sonal Mehra1, Jignesh B Usdadiya1, Vikramraj K Jain1, Durga Prasanna Misra1,2, Vir Singh Negi3.   

Abstract

Cyclophosphamide (CYC) has been the backbone immunosuppressive drug to achieve sustained remission in lupus nephritis (LN). The aim was to evaluate the efficacy and compare adverse effects of low and high dose intravenous CYC therapy in Indian patients with proliferative lupus nephritis. An open-label, parallel group, randomized controlled trial involving 75 patients with class III/IV LN was conducted after obtaining informed consent. The low dose group (n = 38) received 6 × 500 mg CYC fortnightly and high dose group (n = 37) received 6 × 750 mg/m2 CYC four-weekly followed by azathioprine. The primary outcome was complete/partial/no response at 52 weeks. The secondary outcomes were renal and non-renal flares and adverse events. Intention-to-treat analyses were performed. At 52 weeks, 27 (73%) in high dose group achieved complete/partial response (CR/PR) vs 19 (50%) in low dose (p = 0.04). CR was higher in the high dose vs low dose [24 (65%) vs 17 (44%)], although not statistically significant. Non-responders (NR) in the high dose group were also significantly lower 10 (27%) vs low dose 19 (50%) (p = 0.04). The change in the SLEDAI (Median, IQR) was also higher in the high dose 16 (7-20) in contrast to the low dose 10 (5.5-14) (p = 0.04). There was significant alopecia and CYC-induced leucopenia in high dose group. Renal relapses were significantly higher in the low dose group vs high dose [9 (24%) vs 1(3%), (p = 0.01)]. At 52 weeks, high dose CYC was more effective in inducing remission with decreased renal relapses in our population. TRIAL REGISTRATION: The study was registered at http://www.clintrials.gov . NCT02645565.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Adverse effect; Cyclophosphamide; Efficacy; Lupus nephritis; Systemic lupus erythematosus

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29450636     DOI: 10.1007/s00296-018-3995-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Rheumatol Int        ISSN: 0172-8172            Impact factor:   2.631


  6 in total

Review 1.  Rheumatology science and practice in India.

Authors:  Durga Prasanna Misra; Aman Sharma; Vikas Agarwal
Journal:  Rheumatol Int       Date:  2018-07-19       Impact factor: 3.580

Review 2.  Immunosuppressive treatment for proliferative lupus nephritis.

Authors:  David J Tunnicliffe; Suetonia C Palmer; Lorna Henderson; Philip Masson; Jonathan C Craig; Allison Tong; Davinder Singh-Grewal; Robert S Flanc; Matthew A Roberts; Angela C Webster; Giovanni Fm Strippoli
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2018-06-29

Review 3.  What Have We Learnt About the Treatment of Juvenile-Onset Systemic Lupus Erythematous Since Development of the SHARE Recommendations 2012?

Authors:  Kathy L Gallagher; Pallavi Patel; Michael W Beresford; Eve Mary Dorothy Smith
Journal:  Front Pediatr       Date:  2022-04-14       Impact factor: 3.569

4.  Remedial Effect of Intravenous Cyclophosphamide in Corticosteroid-Refractory Patients in the Acute Phase of Neuromyelitis Optica Spectrum Disorder-Related Optic Neuritis.

Authors:  Ling Wang; Kaiqun Liu; Xiao Tan; Lin Zhou; Yuxin Zhang; Xiaoning Liu; Yue Fu; Wei Qiu; Hui Yang
Journal:  Front Neurol       Date:  2021-01-15       Impact factor: 4.003

5.  Ovarian dysfunction with moderate-dose intravenous cyclophosphamide (modified NIH regimen) and mycophenolate mofetil in young adults with severe lupus: a prospective cohort study.

Authors:  Shefali Khanna Sharma; Siddharth Jain; Pooja Bahl; Pragna Potturi; Manish Rathi; Shankar Naidu; Naresh Sachdeva; Varun Dhir; Sanjay Jain
Journal:  Arthritis Res Ther       Date:  2020-08-14       Impact factor: 5.156

Review 6.  Management of lupus nephritis: a systematic literature review informing the 2019 update of the joint EULAR and European Renal Association-European Dialysis and Transplant Association (EULAR/ERA-EDTA) recommendations.

Authors:  Myrto Kostopoulou; Antonis Fanouriakis; Kim Cheema; John Boletis; George Bertsias; David Jayne; Dimitrios T Boumpas
Journal:  RMD Open       Date:  2020-07
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.