Literature DB >> 29450453

The Association of Age With Clinical Presentation and Comorbidities of Pyoderma Gangrenosum.

Hovik J Ashchyan1, Daniel C Butler2, Caroline A Nelson3, Megan H Noe3, William G Tsiaras2, Stephen J Lockwood2, William D James3, Robert G Micheletti3, Misha Rosenbach3, Arash Mostaghimi2.   

Abstract

Importance: Pyoderma gangrenosum is an inflammatory neutrophilic dermatosis. Current knowledge of this rare disease is limited owing to a lack of validated diagnostic criteria and large population studies. Objective: To evaluate the association of age with the clinical presentation and comorbidities of pyoderma gangrenosum. Design, Setting, and Participants: This was a multicenter retrospective cohort study performed at tertiary academic referral centers in urban settings. Adults (≥18 years) who were evaluated and diagnosed as having pyoderma gangrenosum at the Brigham and Women's and Massachusetts General Hospitals from 2000 to 2015 and the University of Pennsylvania Health System from 2006 to 2016 were included. Main Outcomes and Measures: Patient demographics, clinical features, medical comorbidities, and treatment.
Results: Of the 356 validated cases of pyoderma gangrenosum included in the study, 267 (75%) were women and 284 (84.8%) were white. The mean (SD) age at presentation was 51.6 (17.7) years. Pathergy was recorded in 100 patients (28.1%). A total of 238 patients (66.9%) had associated medical comorbidities: inflammatory bowel disease in 146 patients (41.0%); inflammatory arthritis in 73 patients (20.5%); solid organ malignant neoplasms in 23 patients (6.5%); hematologic malignant neoplasms in 21 patients (5.9%); and hematologic disorders, specifically monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance, myelodysplastic syndrome, and polycythemia vera in 17 patients (4.8%). When stratified by age, pathergy was more common in patients 65 years or older (36.3% vs 24.3%; P = .02). Inflammatory bowel disease was the only medical comorbidity that was more common in patients younger than 65 years (47.7% vs 26.6%; P < .001), while a number of medical comorbidities were more common in those 65 years or older, including rheumatoid arthritis (13.3% vs 6.2%; P = .03), ankylosing spondylitis (1.8% vs 0%; P = .04), solid organ malignant neoplasms (13.3% vs 3.3%; P < .001), hematologic malignant neoplasms (9.7% vs 4.1%; P = .04), and the aforementioned hematologic disorders (10.6% vs 2.1%; P < .001). Conclusions and Relevance: Although clinical presentation in this large cohort was similar between different age groups, disease associations varied by age. The findings of this study may allow for a more focused, age-specific evaluation of patients with pyoderma gangrenosum.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29450453      PMCID: PMC5876860          DOI: 10.1001/jamadermatol.2017.5978

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  JAMA Dermatol        ISSN: 2168-6068            Impact factor:   10.282


  10 in total

1.  Dysregulation of inflammatory gene expression in lesional and nonlesional skin of patients with pyoderma gangrenosum.

Authors:  A G Ortega-Loayza; W H Nugent; O M Lucero; S L Washington; J R Nunley; S W Walsh
Journal:  Br J Dermatol       Date:  2017-12-05       Impact factor: 9.302

Review 2.  Skin ulcers misdiagnosed as pyoderma gangrenosum.

Authors:  Roger H Weenig; Mark D P Davis; Patrick R Dahl; W P Daniel Su
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2002-10-31       Impact factor: 91.245

3.  Investigation of new co-factors in 49 patients with pyoderma gangrenosum.

Authors:  Philipp Al Ghazal; Andreas Körber; Joachim Klode; Joachim Dissemond
Journal:  J Dtsch Dermatol Ges       Date:  2011-07-15       Impact factor: 5.584

4.  Pyoderma gangrenosum: a retrospective review of patient characteristics, comorbidities and therapy in 103 patients.

Authors:  A M Binus; A A Qureshi; V W Li; L S Winterfield
Journal:  Br J Dermatol       Date:  2011-12       Impact factor: 9.302

Review 5.  Pyoderma gangrenosum. A comparison of typical and atypical forms with an emphasis on time to remission. Case review of 86 patients from 2 institutions.

Authors:  M L Bennett; J M Jackson; J L Jorizzo; A B Fleischer; W L White; J P Callen
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2000-01       Impact factor: 1.889

Review 6.  Pyoderma gangrenosum: clinicopathologic correlation and proposed diagnostic criteria.

Authors:  W P Daniel Su; Mark D P Davis; Roger H Weenig; Frank C Powell; Harold O Perry
Journal:  Int J Dermatol       Date:  2004-11       Impact factor: 2.736

Review 7.  Etiology and management of pyoderma gangrenosum: a comprehensive review.

Authors:  Iris Ahronowitz; Joanna Harp; Kanade Shinkai
Journal:  Am J Clin Dermatol       Date:  2012-06-01       Impact factor: 7.403

Review 8.  Pathophysiology of pyoderma gangrenosum (PG): an updated review.

Authors:  Sara F Braswell; Tassia C Kostopoulos; Alex G Ortega-Loayza
Journal:  J Am Acad Dermatol       Date:  2015-08-05       Impact factor: 11.527

9.  Pyoderma gangrenosum: a review of 86 patients.

Authors:  F C Powell; A L Schroeter; W P Su; H O Perry
Journal:  Q J Med       Date:  1985-05

10.  Associated factors and comorbidities in patients with pyoderma gangrenosum in Germany: a retrospective multicentric analysis in 259 patients.

Authors:  Philipp Al Ghazal; Katharina Herberger; Jörg Schaller; Anke Strölin; Norman-Philipp Hoff; Tobias Goerge; Hannelore Roth; Eberhard Rabe; Sigrid Karrer; Regina Renner; Jan Maschke; Thomas Horn; Julia Hepp; Sabine Eming; Uwe Wollina; Markus Zutt; Isabell Sick; Benno Splieth; Dorothea Dill; Joachim Klode; Joachim Dissemond
Journal:  Orphanet J Rare Dis       Date:  2013-09-08       Impact factor: 4.123

  10 in total
  20 in total

1.  Pyoderma gangrenosum confused with congenital preauricular fistula infection: A case report.

Authors:  Yang Zhao; Rou-Yu Fang; Guo-Dong Feng; Ting-Ting Cui; Zhi-Qiang Gao
Journal:  World J Clin Cases       Date:  2020-05-06       Impact factor: 1.337

2.  Error in Data.

Authors: 
Journal:  JAMA Dermatol       Date:  2018-05-01       Impact factor: 10.282

3.  Rheumatoid arthritis and pyoderma gangrenosum: a population-based case-control study.

Authors:  Khalaf Kridin; Giovanni Damiani; Arnon D Cohen
Journal:  Clin Rheumatol       Date:  2020-07-01       Impact factor: 2.980

4.  The great imitator with no diagnostic test: pyoderma gangrenosum.

Authors:  Teresa Alonso-León; Heidi H Hernández-Ramírez; Veronica Fonte-Avalos; Sonia Toussaint-Caire; María E Vega-Memije; Adriana Lozano-Platonoff
Journal:  Int Wound J       Date:  2020-08-11       Impact factor: 3.315

5.  Inflammatory arthritis-associated pyoderma gangrenosum: a systematic review.

Authors:  Erika Sawka; Allison Zhou; Emile Latour; Marcia Friedman; Alex G Ortega-Loayza
Journal:  Clin Rheumatol       Date:  2021-05-18       Impact factor: 3.650

6.  Improvement of Ulcerations in Treatment-Resistant Chronic Scarring in a Patient with Pyoderma Gangrenosum After Improving Vascular Insufficiency, Gently Removing Necrotic Debris, and Decreasing Wound Fluid.

Authors:  William J Nahm; Jorge A Mota; Sarah Rojas; Brian J Hizon; Chris Gordon
Journal:  Am J Case Rep       Date:  2018-07-19

7.  Paradoxical Skin Reaction to Certolizumab, an Overlap of Pyoderma Gangrenosum and Psoriasis in a Young Woman Treated for Ankylosing Spondylitis: Case Report with Literature Review.

Authors:  Anna Gawdzik; Małgorzata Ponikowska; Alina Jankowska-Konsur; Zdzisław Woźniak; Joanna Maj; Jacek C Szepietowski
Journal:  Dermatol Ther (Heidelb)       Date:  2020-05-23

8.  Pyoderma gangrenosum faciale in a patient with Crohn's disease.

Authors:  Timothy Arleo; Justin Cheeley
Journal:  JAAD Case Rep       Date:  2020-06-21

9.  Two cases of maggot debridement therapy in pyoderma gangrenosum.

Authors:  Ryan S Din; William G Tsiaras; Arash Mostaghimi
Journal:  JAAD Case Rep       Date:  2018-11-10

Review 10.  Recent advances in managing and understanding pyoderma gangrenosum.

Authors:  Josh Fletcher; Raed Alhusayen; Afsaneh Alavi
Journal:  F1000Res       Date:  2019-12-12
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.